The Red Cross is another Colossal Scam – and always was
Wed 10:36 am +00:00, 24 Sep 2025
Source: https://mileswmathis.com/redcross.pdf
by Miles Mathis
First published September 21, 2025
Surprised? You shouldn’t be. What else have we researched and found to be genuine?
So that you don’t have to take my word for it, you can start at NPR, Grunge, The New York Times, and
Slate, who have all written big exposes of the Red Cross in recent years. If you are coming in cold
here, I think they will shock you. Once you have absorbed all that, come back here and I will take you
the next few flights down the rabbit hole.
I got into this one in a strange way, as usual. My usual serendipity. I recently bought a first edition of
Mark Twain’s The Gilded Age, which I got for little more than the price of shipping from Ebay. The
covers were worn off, so I am going to have to completely rebind it, but fortunately I have that ability.
Before doing that, I decided to read it, having the impression it was an expose of the robber barons like
Jay Gould. I quickly found it wasn’t that at all, being instead a work of fiction. Twain actually wrote
only about half of it, the rest being written by his co-author Charles Warner. In fact, Warner wrote
most of the more interesting parts, though his style wasn’t as colorful as Twain’s. We see Twain in his
early years trying to copy or match Dickens’ comic characterizations, but mostly failing. I didn’t get far
in before giving up: it was too tiresome.
Instead I went to Wiki to read a synopsis, deciding it wasn’t really worth my time regardless. I would
rather read straight history of that period, if you can call it that. I find “history” is normally easier to
see through than admitted fiction, though they are both mainly fictional. Anyway, while doing that I
noticed other entries for “Gilded Age” at Wiki, including the recent HBO miniseries of that name by
the Downton Abbey author Julian Fellowes. I had never heard of it and sometimes like such things,
though I didn’t care for Downton Abbey. But period pieces like Pride and Prejudice or Wives and
Daughters fit me to a T. So I gave it a shot. Lots of pretty ladies and amazing dresses, but that’s about
all I can say for it. Again, I can’t recommend it. Like most of these things, it reads as propaganda for
the rich, and these families are presented as far more likable and charismatic than they were or are.
The action centers around railroad tycoon George Russell and his family, nouveau riche New Yorkers
pitted against old-money families like the Livingstons and Astors. You would have detested all these
people on both sides, and should, but Fellowes misses that completely, actually whitewashing the
Russells to the greatest extent possible, doing everything he can to sell them to you. Very strange. . .
Ah, I see why now: he is actually the Baron Julian Kitchener-Fellowes, House of Lords. So he is a
cousin of these people in real life. He is selling himself. He is not really a Kitchener, taking the name
from his wife. But he is something better: a Stuart. His mother was Olwen Stuart-Jones and his
maternal grandfather was CBE, scrubbed at thepeerage to keep you from tracing him back further.
Fellowes’ stepmother is a Noel, of the Earls of Gainsborough, which also links him to the Berkeleys,
Hays, Greys, and Eyres. On his father’s side he is a Forbes and a Shirley.
I found it interesting the Russells are clearly presented as Jewish, since the actors in that family all look
far more Jewish than the other actors—though we can be sure they are ALL Jewish. And yet the
subject never comes up, and Fellowes even implies the mother is Irish, though she looks and acts
entirely Jewish. Fellowes seems to be winking at his cousins while assuming his Gentile audience in
the US won’t catch on to any of this, which most probably won’t.
Anyway, the miniseries is a pleasant though false and boring (and often decidedly stilted and lame)
fantasy, but it did bear some fruit here, since one of the subplots concerns Clara Barton and the initial
funding of the American Red Cross by Lady Russell. Since the entire miniseries is the usual
propaganda-fest, I was led to ask myself if the Red Cross might be part of that. And of course the
answer is yes. Among all the other usual rubbish, Fellowes is trying to resell the Red Cross here.*
I had never looked at the Red Cross before, but I should have known it wasn’t as advertised. Here is
the second sentence at Wiki:
The organization has provided services after many notable disasters, including the sinking of
the RMS Titanic in 1912, World War I, the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918, World War II, Hurricane
Katrina, and the Maui wildfires of 2023. It also provides blood banking services.[7] Every single one of those thing is a huge red flag, as my readers and I have discovered in the past
decade. The Titanic never sank, so there was nothing for the Red Cross to do. The pandemic of 1918
was a similar fake to the pandemic of 2020, so that one should be very easy to understand. It is almost
like you were there. The Maui wildfires were faked and managed using CGI and other tricks. And
even the blood banking is a big clue here, as I showed you recently.
John D. Rockefeller and four others donated money to help create a national headquarters near
the White House.[18]
That’s your next red flag. Even the footnote is a clue, being aces and eights. And Rockefeller was
possibly the biggest thief and conman of all time. Even the White House is a red flag, because this
indicates the American Red Cross wasn’t run by Clara Barton. She was just a front, the real players
being in the White House and Pentagon, which was also nearby.
Until the middle of the nineteenth century, there were no organized or well-established army
nursing systems for casualties, nor safe or protected institutions, to accommodate and treat those
who were wounded on the battlefield.
That’s on the International Red Cross page at Wiki. But it make no sense. None of this ever made any
sense, since you would expect governments to provide that as part of preparation for war. And of
course they did. No government ever just forgot about medical treatment for wounded, or failed to hire
doctors or nurses. The whole idea is an absurdity. You are already taxed trillions for defense, and this
should be part of that. There is no reason you should have to give to charities to provide nursing to
wounded soldiers, or to people wounded in natural disasters either. So the whole thing looks like a
scam from the first word. The only question remaining being, how big, how deep, and who runs it?
As to how deep, the answer as usual is “all the way down.” The International Red Cross was started by
Jean-Henri Dunant, who they admit was a scammer. Most sites sell him as a great hero, but if you dig
a bit you find that all falls apart. Wikipedia at first sells him as a Calvinist businessman from Geneva,
but he was actually a just a crypto-Jewish bank clerk with big ideas, fronting for much bigger fish. By
age 24, out of nowhere, he founded the YMCA, so we know he had huge connections. He reminds me
somewhat of Charlie Kirk in that regard. The next year he published his first book, though he had no
degree and no experience writing. At age 27 he started his own company to operate by colonial charter
in Algeria, so he is sounding like some sort of secret agent already. By age 30 he was taking personal
meetings with the Emperor Napoleon III. So he obviously came from wealth to start with, and I
assume his family were bankers in Geneva.
His mother was Antoinette Colladon, the Colladons being crypto-Jews of Geneva from way back
involved in the deepest intrigue—see Nicolas Colladon, a comrade of John Calvin himself. My guest
writers and myself have already thoroughly exposed Calvin as a Jewish agent.
Dunant’s scam hit the wall in 1867, when, at age 38, Geneva charged him with faking bankruptcy and
other crimes and he had to flee the city to avoid trial. He blew town owing millions, as these people
do. He could never return to his home city due to an outstanding arrest warrant, though somehow he
avoided extradition. Miraculously the Red Cross was able to survive his ignominious fall, replacing
him with another Jewish agent and feigning innocence. He was persona non grata in Europe for the
next three decades, until in 1901 Dunant nominated himself for the first Nobel Peace Prize, and I guess
his family either knew Cecil Rhodes or bribed or extorted him somehow, since he won it.
All this is admitted, though you have to dig for it. Most places, including Wiki, are keen to sell Dunant
as a great hero, shoving the sanitized and falsified version of history down your throat.
You will say that just because its founder was a scammer doesn’t prove the Red Cross was a scam from
its foundation. I would say it pretty much does. But I won’t leave it there. I have more for you. In
case you are too lazy to take links, I will give you highlights of those recent articles here. In the Great
Flood of 1927, the Red Cross ran refugee camps in Louisiana where displaced blacks were imprisoned
and forced to work.
After the 2010 Haiti earthquake, the Red Cross took in over $500 million and claimed to provide
homes to 130,000 people. But in the five-year period from 2010 to 2015, it built exactly . . . six houses
in Haiti. SIX.
Do you remember how they raised so much money? They had four ex-Presidents—Carter, Clinton,
Bush, and Obama—as their talking heads, begging you to donate. That’s kind of uncanny, isn’t it,
considering what we just discovered above about the Red Cross having its early national headquarters
next door to the White House and Pentagon.
Do you remember that commercial? I can remember finding that highly suspicious at the time. Why
would those guys be speaking for the Red Cross? Were they paid for that, or did they get a percentage?
As I say, it makes no sense, because the US already spends huge amounts for disaster relief and foreign
aid, and that money comes from federal taxes. So you have already paid for that once. Why are these
ex-Presidents going on TV and begging you to pay for it a second time?
For comparison, the US has given the Ukraine about $200 billion in the past three years. At the same
time we have sent about $40 billion to Israel. So you can’t argue we couldn’t afford to send half a
billion to Haiti. But you shouldn’t be expected to pay for it a second time through charities. You also
shouldn’t be giving to charities in the Ukraine or Israel, for the same reason. Unless you like being
taxed twice for the same thing.
After 911, the Red Cross ran a blood drive in New York City, taking in 475,000 units. They claimed to
have used only 258, flushing the other 474,742 units down the drain. The writer at Grunge takes that at
face value, but we know it is much worse than that, since we may assume those other units were NOT
discarded, instead being sold to the highest bidders or otherwise redirected to rich ghouls. They don’t
call it the RED Cross for nothing.
Now let’s look at Clara Barton. You may have thought she came out of nowhere, becoming a volunteer
nurse just because she was so altruistic. Nope. Like Einstein, she actually came out of the Patent
Office, where she was a clerk. She worked in Washington, DC, so she didn’t come out of nowhere.
Suddenly, in 1861, at the start of the Civil War, at age 39, she decided to become a pretend nurse,
though she had no training or prior experience in nursing. We are told she and other lady volunteers
were opposed by the War Department and field surgeons, but that isn’t really believable. Far more
likely is that this was a program of the War Department, with Barton chosen as their public face.
Again, none of this makes much sense, since the War Department should have been hiring trained
nurses, or training them. Bringing in these rich ladies from the Ladies Aid Society and the Patent
Office looks very suspicious. Which reminds us of another of the main functions of the Red Cross
from the beginning, both here and in Europe. Dunant allegedly got his start at the famous Battle of
Solferino, where 40,000 French and Italian soldiers were allegedly left dead or wounded. There were
allegedly 270,000 soldiers in the battle, though I have proved all these battles were vastly inflated—
supposing they happened at all. See my paper on Napoleon for more on that. Well, the Red Cross was
there to confirm those fake numbers, you see; and the same thing happened in the American Civil War,
where Clara Barton was there to confirm the casualty numbers and all the other propaganda as well.
Very convenient for the War Department, you see.
After the Battle of Solferino, Dunant didn’t just confirm the numbers in the newspaper, he wrote an
entire book, In Memory of Solferino, which was heavily promoted in Europe. We are told he published
it with his own money, but that is assuredly a lie. The book is entirely unsubstantiated, being based on
nothing but “eyewitness” accounts of obvious agents like Dunant, so it is worthless as history. But it
wasn’t worthless to the War Departments of Europe, who used it to promote volunteer relief
organizations, volunteer nurses, and huge charity efforts, effectively doubling their coffers without
raising taxes. You don’t have to pay volunteers. A brilliant con, you have to admit. And as usual, the
people fell for it.
They tell you Barton was a volunteer, but she actually had a large salary, just like the current staff.
They aren’t working for free, so they aren’t volunteers.
Clara Barton’s brother David was high up in the Union Navy, being a captain and quartermaster. So
she had contacts right to the top. The Bartons were also Hammonds from Essex County, MA (Salem),
as well as Platts, Treadwells, and Learneds (linking them not only to Learned Hand, but to Michael
Learned, the mother on the Waltons). Through Elijah Moore, she came from the Rices of Suffolk, and
they were originally Rhys from Wales, linking us the Howards and Tudors. This means Clara Barton is
a descendant of FitzAlans and Plantagenets, and related to many Kings of England. Just what we
expected coming in. She is also peerage on her mother’s side, being a Chadwicke, a Heywood, a
Crosby, and a Buckley.
David Barton married Julia Porter, who was descended from Moses Tyler, one of the accusers in
Salem. We already know that was one of the biggest fakes in American history. These Tylers come
from Lady Margaret Tyler of Shropshire, daughter of Sir William Braine. And they link us to the
Blounts, Lyttons, Dudleys, Nevilles and Windsors. Which means . . . David married a cousin of the
peerage, just as we would expect.
In the early years, Clara Barton’s handler was Brigadier General Henry Wilson, who would become
Vice President under Grant. His real name was (allegedly) Jeremiah Colbath, so why would the VP
need to exist under a fake name? He wasn’t adopted. We are never told, though I would assume it is
because he was a crypto-Jew. The encyclopedias tell the usual sob story about Colbath being the son
of a day laborer, and himself being an indentured servant as a young man. Later he was a shoemaker.
Not a chance, since his father was named Winthrop Colbath, Jr. Not the name of a day laborer. His
grandmother was of the wealthy Leightons of New Hampshire, also linking us the Ayers we have seen
many times. Which confirms my first guess, since all these families were Jews or crypto-Jews, the
Ayers now famously so from my research. She was also related to Clements and Whitneys. This also
links us to the Cromwells of Essex County, who are scrubbed but who of course come from the famous
Cromwells. So Colbath is probably also a fake name, being a fudge of Colburn or Colebrooke or
something.
During the American Civil War, Wilson was Chairman of the Committee on Military Affairs and the
Militia, and later the Committee on Military Affairs. In that capacity, he oversaw action on over
15,000 War and Navy Department nominations that Abraham Lincoln submitted during the course
of the war, and worked closely with him on legislation affecting the Army and Navy.[51]
That’s straight from the Wikipedia page on Wilson, so we have caught them in another contradiction.
We were told on Barton’s page that the government did not support her, but then they admitted that
Wilson—Chairman of the Committee on Military Affairs—was her most supportive patron. Proving
my point that Barton was a government front, pulled out the Patent Office in DC due to her wealthy
family and connections, and because she was a woman. They needed a woman to run this charity
scam.
Wilson was a major spook, since after the war he was an early member of MOLLUS. Wiki sells him as
an especially conscientious Senator, but he was not too conscientious to get involved in the Credit
Mobilier scandal. As VP he pulled strings in the Senate and skated. This is also amusing:
In July 1861, Wilson was present for the Civil War’s first major battle at Bull Run
Creek in Manassas, Virginia, an event which many senators, representatives, newspaper reporters,
and Washington society elite traveled from the city to observe in anticipation of a quick Union
victory.[54] Riding out in a carriage in the early morning, Wilson brought a picnic hamper of
sandwiches to feed Union troops.[54] However, the battle turned into a Confederate rout, forcing
Union troops to make a panicky retreat.[54] Caught up in the chaos, Wilson was almost captured by
the Confederates, while his carriage was crushed,[54] and he had to make an embarrassing return
to Washington on foot.[54] The result of this battle had a sobering effect on many in the North,
causing widespread realization that Union victory would not be won without a prolonged struggle.
[54]
Tends to confirm that large parts of the war were little more than theater, doesn’t it? Senators riding
out to watch Bull Run as a picnic and almost getting captured? Something doesn’t add up there, does
it?
Wilson’s wife was Harriet Howe, generally scrubbed, but Wikitree admits she was of the wealthy
Howes of Framingham, who were also Gouldings and Garfields, linking us forward to President James
Garfield. The Gouldings are of course Jewish. As are the Garfields and Howes.
So Barton and Wilson were cousins as well. The usual in DC. Both Wilson and Barton were from
counties just west of Boston.
After the First Battle of Bull Run, Barton placed an ad in a Massachusetts newspaper for supplies;
the response was a profound influx of supplies.[15] She worked to distribute stores, clean field
hospitals, apply dressings, and serve food to wounded soldiers in close proximity to several
battles, including Cedar Mountain, Second Bull Run, Antietam, and Fredericksburg.[16] Again, does that sound like a good way to run a major war? Place ads in the newspaper for supplies?
And why would Clara Barton be doing that, when her own brother was quartermaster? A quartermaster
does what? BUYS SUPPLIES FOR THE ARMY. But I guess the government didn’t want to buy
supplies, so the quartermaster had his sister put an ad in Craigslist for free supplies:
WANTED: ONE MILLION GRATIS MILITARY UNIFORMS, BLUE. ONE MILLION RIFLES. ONE
MILLION CANTEENS. ONE BILLION ROUNDS OF AMMUNITION. ONE BILLION BANDAGES. ONE
BILLION ASPIRIN. ONE MILLION PRE-PRINTED GRAVESTONES.
*He also resells Edison, the Impressionists (led by Degas), all the Phoenician darlings. But the main thing on
sale here is the old idea that any of these wealthy families were nouveau riche. Yes, the fortunes would rise and
fall as the Phoenicians competed with one another, but none of them were new money, being from a different
class. The very wealthy are of one class and always have been. We see that here, where you are supposed to
think the Russells were interlopers—being Irish Jews or something, guffaw—while of course the Russells have
been top peers all along, both in the US and in Britain. They aren’t any more nouveau or any more Jewish than
the Livingstons—sold to you as old money just because they signed the Declaration of Independence, I guess.
Remember, the Livingstons were originally Levinsons, the sons of Levi. In the miniseries you also see the Fish
sold to you as old money, closely allied to the Astors. But the Fish and Astors were also Phoenicians, and they
hardly try to hide it, since the actors who play them are obviously Jewish. They don’t even hire blondes to try to
hide it, as they did with Miss Brooke. Which brings us to that. Brooke is played by Louisa Jacobsen, full name
Louisa Jacobsen Gummer, the daughter of Meryl Streep. Jacobsen and Gummer are Jewish names (think Judy
Garland, real name Frances Gumm/Gummer) and Louisa is Jewish. She is wearing a blonde wig, of course. So
Fellowes is winking at you again, knowing you won’t get it. Brooke is a van Rhijn, and the van Rhijns are
Dutch Jews. They are old money only because they came over to New York early, back when it was still New
Amsterdam. So ALL the characters are Jewish and all the actors who play them are, too. When the period
movies are historical, the actors are chosen to play their ancestors, as I have shown you. For instance, Mel
Gibson played William Wallace in Braveheart, and Mel is a Wallace. William Wallace is his 16g-uncle or
something. Even when the story is fiction this is often true. Brad Pitt played Benjamin Button and Brad is a
Button in real life.
