Is the famous Andrew/Virginia Guiffre photo a fake?
Sun 3:06 pm +00:00, 11 May 2025 6I am no expert but reading Miles W Mathis explanations about shading and colour in photographs, you have to say that the whiteness of Virginia in the ‘picture’ compared to the relative darkness of Andrew’s face suggests that this is not a single photograph taken in one go.
The flash in the picture reflected in the window suggests that either Andrew or Virginia was substituted into the picture.
My guess is that a picture of Andrew holding someone else was possibly merged into one of Virginia also holding someone else, who was removed and replaced by Andrew.
The hand that is around VIrginia appears to have darker skin than Andrew’s other hand.
Ghislaine is heavily tanned, but is a lot further away from the camera flash than Virginia. The two could possibly be in the same photo with shadow effect looking correct (Virginia and Ghislaine), but why is the one face so white and the other so very dark? Is it a triple fake?
Then the room.
The banister suggests we are on a landing. The curtain to the right should have a partner curtain to the left, but it doesn’t.
Instead there is a white wall behind Andrew where the partner curtain should be. Unless the room has a very unusual layout.
Virginia’s right side hair looks unnatural against the white of the wall, and also has an unnaturally straight line against Andrew’s upper body.
The line cut between the two merged pictures appears to follow an arc down the edge of Virgina’s right side hair which is much wider than the left side,.
Below Virgina’s arcing hair the picture merge appears to follow Andrew’s bodyline down to his hand. The two cuts meet at an exact point where her hair ends.
Andrew’s right hand against Virginia’s trousers seems very dark given how extremely bright her upper body and face are.
The more you look at the picture, the less real it appears.
So why was the fake, if it is a fake, put out?
It’s possible Andrew was photographed with someone else and that picture had to be suppressed.
The fact that he’s with a mature nice looking woman doesn’t seem totally unreasonable given the fact that he could have chosen someone much younger to partner with.
Maybe VIrginia did partner with Andrew, but the picture seems to be a window dressing of some kind.
As for the body language stuff, it sounds like so much tosh after a two minutes of the video. I clicked off.
What do you make of it?
Here is a short video I came across a few days ago, loose lips comes to mind, I’m not too sure he knows he is being filmed. It’s John Bryan, an American businessman who had friendly ties with Sarah Ferguson and was reportedly a crisis advisor to Andrew. The video appears to have links to Project Veritas and seems to remove any doubt about Andrews activities with the little ones.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8pS9os7bH0&ab_channel=O%E2%80%99KeefeMediaGroup
good video, Kneepad. maybe I’m looking at a poor reproduction of the picture. the one in the video is better.
Thanks Tap, there’s only 4 people who know if that picture is real, the photographer and the 3 people who are pictured, they all know if they where there or not, What is not in doubt is what these people do to children and one things for sure, it’s far more evil than the good people of this world can even begin to comprehend. In the video of John Bryan, he says he was p/ssed that Andrew lied to him and then stated it was not cool what he was doing to the children, Shouldn’t that be the other way around, at least! The abuse of children, by the ‘elite’ is far more widespread and evil than we realise and it needs to be made more widely aware to the general populous.
The Bryan recording seems odd. He knows recording is everywhere now. He’s looking to distance too. They all want Andrew to carry the can to protect the big fish. He’s doing as asked, and no doubt paid.
On reading through the YT comments of the article video, the general consensus of those making the point, say Virginia seems perfectly happy to be there and that’s so true, she does. But, I would just like to make the point, I would imagine, that in these scenarios, the victims are often drugged or given alcohol to put them in a relaxed mood and make them more compliant, maybe she is not in total control of her emotions, if this is the case. Whether this picture is real or not, the behaviour that is being implied certainly did and does go on, in the top echelons of society and someone needs to put a stop to it.
The Roman system of government which we have up to his very day is based on permitted child abuse for privileged levels like priests, judges, politicians, civil servants, teachers, army officers and so on. That’s why it is always covered up and never stops. Andrew is the fall guy for many others who hide in the shadows. The set up Guiffre picture is clearly taken or ‘created’ for a purpose. He is not that bright and is of little significance to the hierarchy of power. Think of he Hunter Biden laptop revelations. As pictures go, I am sure they have worse as regards age of the partners he enjoyed – such pictures appear online – panda eyes, pizzagate, Hampstead whistleblower kids and many others. The age of Virginia doesn’t look all that bad compared to the reality of child abuse. They need a fall guy but not the awful reality of the Virgin Islands etc to come out. There are very powerful interests behind the handling of child abuse PR.