What future does the US want? Bankrupt empire, or prosperous, peaceful nation?
Mon 9:40 am +00:00, 25 May 2026The US hypothetically seeking a constructive role among nations rather than seeking dominance over them is for a nation that wants to be stable. The current US strategy is driven by a desire to be supreme. Historically, when a great power chooses supremacy over stability, the transition to a new international order usually happens through a major crisis – like a world war – rather than a “grand bargain.”
If the US can’t move towards a multipolar world by choice, it will happen by compulsion. China, Russia and Iran and a hundred other countries are ready to move on. The rest will find themselves playing catch up.
Countries like Iran, Russia and China have had enough of playing America’s games of threat. America wants to be all powerful in the world, at least the Satanic Cult does that currently controls the USA. The Pentagon and the US Armed Forces should ensure they are not used to no purpose other than killing children to satisfy the demons that are the actual controllers of the Satanic Cult..
| |
| Russia and China Lock In New Power Bloc The summit between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping produced more than forty agreements spanning energy, finance, aviation, artificial intelligence and industrial cooperation, signaling that the Moscow–Beijing partnership has moved beyond symbolic diplomacy into something far more structural. Unlike recent US-China meetings heavy on ceremony but light on deliverables, the Russia-China talks appeared almost routine – less theatre, more paperwork. Behind the scenes, the real headline was energy. The long-discussed Power of Siberia 2 pipeline, designed to redirect Russian gas once intended for Europe toward China, is reportedly nearing final approval. Moscow and Beijing are also deepening cooperation in nuclear energy and rare earth minerals, while discussion has already begun around the possibility of a future “Power of Siberia 3.” Europe spent years imagining itself as the indispensable market for Russian energy. That illusion is now evaporating pipeline by pipeline. A major shift came shortly before the summit, when China effectively declared that companies purchasing Russian oil and gas would no longer be left exposed to US sanctions pressure. Beijing signaled it would protect refiners and firms targeted by Washington, clearing one of the last obstacles slowing deeper energy integration with Russia. The message was blunt: commercial ties with Moscow are now considered strategically important enough to justify direct confrontation with American financial pressure. That decision is expected to accelerate oil and gas flows between the two countries while also expanding financial coordination inside BRICS. Officials accompanying Putin reportedly included Central Bank chief Elvira Nabiullina, highlighting the growing importance of payment systems and sanctions-resistant financial infrastructure. What is emerging is not just a partnership, but the architecture of a parallel economic system designed to function outside Western leverage. The aviation sector offered another glimpse into the direction of travel. Russia and China are reviving joint civilian aircraft projects that stalled after the 2014 Ukraine crisis and the later wave of Western sanctions. Chinese calculations appear to have changed dramatically. If access to Western markets is increasingly restricted anyway, Beijing sees fewer reasons to avoid Russian technology partnerships. Joint development of wide-body aircraft and heavy helicopters is back on the table, with Russia contributing advanced engine technology and China focusing on manufacturing and avionics. At the same time, Beijing showed little enthusiasm for American hopes of massive Boeing purchases during Donald Trump’s recent China visit. Instead of buying more Western aircraft, China is doubling down on building its own. Europe, meanwhile, watches from the sidelines as industrial opportunities it once expected to dominate quietly migrate eastward. The political language surrounding the summit was equally significant. Moscow and Beijing presented themselves as “civilizational states” operating in a multipolar world where no single bloc has the authority to define legitimacy or hierarchy. For Russia, this marks a notable ideological break from its long-standing identification with Europe. The Kremlin now openly frames itself as separate from the European political family rather than merely estranged from it. As drone attacks linked to the Ukraine conflict continue and some Eastern European voices openly call for deeper NATO involvement, Moscow appears increasingly convinced that escalation is being encouraged deliberately in hopes of pulling Washington back into direct confrontation. Yet at the same moment, Russia’s leadership seems more confident that it can weather prolonged isolation from Europe because the strategic fallback plan is no longer theoretical. It is already under construction – stretching from Siberian gas fields to Chinese factories, financial systems and transport corridors. | |
| |
|













316