The evidence shows more CO2 would lead to a greener more bountiful planet with higher crop yields.
Mon 12:53 pm +00:00, 18 Aug 2025 9The evidence shows more CO2 would lead to a greener more bountiful planet with higher crop yields. Can you see now why CO2 has been vilified ? and your taxes are being squandered on false ‘Green technologies’ which will make us all poorer, colder and prone to food shortages. 97% of scientists agree with those paying for their ‘research’ which is why the opinions of retired ( impartial) scientists should be more trusted.
They have Co2 injection systems in many plant nurseries to increase plant growth. In return the plants produce the Oxygen which we need to live. You know how it goes though 5 out of 6 scientists claim Russian roulette is safe.
CO2 is simply the gas of life.
100%
The problem is the conversion from solid (coal) or liquid (oil) or gaseous fuel (Methane) to their burned forms, as the atoms take up thousands of times more space in the atmosphere. The expanded atmosphere rotates through space grinding away against the plasma (there is no such thing as space) and creating very high temperatures in the ionosphere (thousands of degrees higher than it was). This is the cause of the warming, not any greenhouse effect. We could power the earth in many other ways without expanding the earth’s atmospheres, but the governments prefer us to be headed towards catastrophe. They kill billions with medical interventions, wars and climatic methods. It can’t all be in error.
Sounds like Rogers unproven, certainly largely unknown, theory. They can easily dismiss him as a crank
Whatever, if the warming continues then massive amounts of methane frozen in the Artic and elsewhere will escape into the atmosphere. Implying a future catastrophe. Question is, when? Obviously nobody knows. Certainly nobody will stop it
Because modern civilisation depends on coal, gas and oil, no way round that at present. Solar or wind powered container ships or trains will never happen, nor will they ever replace gas and oil for power generation without civilisation collapse
Nuclear? Not with present technology
Hydrogen, water, free energy etc etc? Won’t ever happen while the Money Power makes so much out of gas and oil. And also uses it as a key control tool. It’s too useful to them. All such sources have been supressed ruthlessly in the past and hard to see why that would change
The new AI world will use even more power won’t it? Talk of needing new power stations to power all the AI servers
Can we believe that it’s really warming Pete, and that weather changes aren’t created by geoengineering?
Yes, it’s a case of cause and effect. Mess with nature and nature will mess with you. I personally believe we at past the point of no return and things will only get worse.
Rev 16:8 -9
“Mess with nature and nature will mess with you”
Makes total sense to me
I’ve no idea Ian. Both are possible I imagine
Possibly local geoengineering, I’d imagine they don’t do that where nobody lives. But I don’t know for sure
Maybe globally something else, perhaps as Tap describes. Rogers theory sounds possible to me. Again I don’t know for sure