Saint Nelson Mandela – Money Power agent
Fri 2:42 pm +00:00, 15 Aug 2025
Source: https://mileswmathis.com/mandela4.pdf
First 8 pages by an Afrikaans South African guy
Worth a look as background
Below is Mathis take on Saint Nelson the British Agent
Miles: I made only small edits to the text above, preferring to let my readers see this paper as I
received it. In places the attitude drifts a little far right for my taste, but the overall conclusions
are mostly correct, so I let everything stand. My guest writer here is on the right track, and that
is what concerns us here. However, his last line is not correct. It is not Mandela’s legacy we
have been left with, as his paper otherwise pretty much proves. Mandela was just a front for the
bankers who wished to loot the country, as he shows. So blaming Mandela for anything is
pointless. Mandela was just an actor chosen for his looks and voice, like Morgan Freeman. If a
film he is in fails, do you blame Freeman? No, you blame the producers, directors, or writers.
Freeman isn’t responsible for the content of a Hollywood film, he is just memorizing lines. Same
thing here.
As for the conspiracy theories surrounding Mandela, you already know what I think of most of
those. These theories are just bad ones to keep you off the good ones. And the good ones are?
Well, let’s start by just looking closely at Mandela. And I mean his face. His head. He is
obviously part white, so why don’t they admit it? As he got older, he also betrayed some Asian
blood. In some pictures he looks part Chinese. His eyes are the giveaway there, because he is
far more squinty than you would expect of an African.
So what, you will say. Well, when we combine that with the fact he was Thembu royalty from
birth and lived at the Great Place in Mqhekezweni, we begin to see the familiar story. Both
parents were supposed to be illiterate, but for some reason not given young Nelson was sent by
his devout Christian mother to a Methodist school at age seven. They get Mandela’s father out of
the story very early as usual, having him die under mysterious and ungiven causes when Nelson
was nine. That prevents us from researching him, likely finding he was an Intelligence asset as
well. They also want us to believe Nelson was no longer in the line of kings because his greatgrandmother was Ixhaba clan, but that may or may not be true. I would say it is probably NOT
true, and that Mandela was always cloaked royalty, with a near ancestor who was non-black—
Jewish with some part Asian. This is why he was chosen for the project. You can be sure that
he didn’t just accidentally find himself in his later positions, and that this was all planned out
long in advance, with a full script.
It helps to also look at someone like Walter Sisulu, as support for what I just said. He was
Deputy President of the ANC and also allegedly spent 25 years at Robben Island prison. He was
related to Mandela through Mandela’s first wife Evelyn Mase. Sisulu was also Thembu nobility,
though not—as far as we know—from the royal line. But they do admit Sisulu was half white,
since his father was Albert Victor Dickinson.
Well, what do you know, another crypto-Jew from Leicester! He is not listed in the peerage, but
he is probably related to the Barons of Painswick, including the son of the first baron, Hon.
Richard Sebastian Willoughby Dickinson, Assistant Chief Secretary of North Rhodesia in the
1920s. Albert’s mother was an Ormerod, also of the peerage, and they were closely related there
to the Mayers, Lathams, Bailey baronets and Parnell barons. Through the Parnells, we link
immediately to the Stuarts, Earls of Bute, explaining what is going on here. Through them we
quickly hit the Pierreponts, Montagus, Campbells, MacKenzies, and everyone else. So Sisulu is
obviously a front for his father. In the same way, we may assume Mandela is a front for the
same folks. But they used Mandela rather than Sisulu for several reasons. One, Mandela was
more likable on a first look. He always had a great smile. Two, if they had used Sisulu as the
top man, he would be too easy to connect to these fellows like Dickinson. They needed to hide a
bit better than that.
Another thing that most people miss is that the Thembu are part of the amaXhosa tribe that just
happens to practice circumcision. Let’s see, who else famously practices circumcision? We are
told it is an ancient practice among these tribal people, but we are told a lot of things. Very little
was documented about the amaXhosa until the Dutch arrived in the mid-1600s, so the
Phoenicians could have very well brought circumcision to these people at any time before that.
Which is just to say that we should consider the possibility that the royal house of the Thembu
may have been connected to the Phoenician Navy for many centuries. Besides which, the
“Dutch” and the Phoenician Navy are not two entities, but mainly one entity. Our guest author is
mainly acquainted with Afrikaners of the mid-levels, but we know the highest level was
composed of what he calls “the usual suspects”. So among the Dutch, the Jews weren’t a
separate sub-class, they were just the top of the Dutch (and British) pyramid. All of Africa, like
the rest of the world, was conquered for their benefit and enrichment, and they are the ones that
owned all the mines, land, and other resources. They still do. In fact, after the revolution, they
owned even more. As for the Guptas, mentioned in his conclusion, they are also only part
Indian. They are simply the Phoenician Navy’s Indian branch.
So, did they replace Mandela at some point? I doubt it. The mole on the side of his nose and the
pattern of his brow wrinkles indicates to me it is the same actor all along. He was just fatter
when he was young. And voices change over time. I will show that Mandela probably spent
about three decades in England, and the colder climate there wasn’t suited to his southern
constitution. It may have affected his voice. But even if they did replace him, it doesn’t much
matter. He was just an actor all along, so if there was a switch, he was no faker after the switch
than before. The important thing—the thing they are trying desperately to keep your eyes off of
with Mandela Effects and body doubles and different voices—is that Mandela was always just a
puppet of these Jewish billionaires behind him. They required a black frontman for this long
con, and they needed someone slick and plausible. They also needed him to be a bit of a rebel,
to make him appeal to the black population, so they manufactured a list of murders and a long
jail term. But you can be sure he was never in jail. Actors don’t agree to spend time in jail.
They give us the clue themselves: he was prisoner #46664, which they still advertise prominently
on t-shirts and coffeemugs. It is so in-your-face it passes belief.
One of the best bits of information my guest writer gives us is that Mandela’s first job in the
legal profession was working as a clerk for Lazar Sidelsky’s big Jewish firm. But that needs
expansion, since it is important to note that Mandela became a Communist at that time.
Meaning, he became a Jewish agent. I have shown that Communism is a fake front and always
has been, back to the 1840s. It has always been composed only of Jewish agents and a few
dupes, and no one else. So my readers should see all this as the biggest red flag possible. It
proves beyond any doubt that Mandela was being groomed as the premier front for these rich
Jews. More proof is that it is Sisulu who got Mandela the job with Sidelsky.
Was Mandela pressured to do this in some way, or did he do it completely of his own volition?
We may never know, but we do have a quote: “I simply found myself doing so, and could not do
otherwise.” To me that indicates considerable pressure, which is not hard to believe. Most of us
feel the same pressure, though some of us find a way to do otherwise.
If we follow the story at Wikipedia, we find he next found himself at university, where he “was
increasingly influenced by Sisulu”. We already hit that. It means he was increasingly influenced
by Sisulu’s father Dickinson of the British peerage. This was basically a Third Boer War, but
fought covertly this time, using all the tricks of the Phoenician Navy. It was one family of
Phoenicians squabbling across more than a century with another family, for a major piece of the
worldwide pie.
Remember this was just a continuation of the long battle for supremacy of the Dutch East India
Company and the British East India Company. They had battled earlier for America. New York
used to be called New Amsterdam, you know. A lot of the battles in the early history and prehistory of the US, up to 1812, were actually between BEIC and DEIC, though they don’t tell you
that. So keep that in mind as we proceed. Also keep in mind that the Boer Wars never really
ended. They just became covert and were waged by proxy.
Next, we are told Mandela married Evelyn Mase, but there is a big problem there, since the main
photo is a really poor fake:
Look how Mandela is outlined to your left. That would only happen if he was backlit, so he was
probably outside there. They then pasted him into this photo with Mase indoors. Also notice the
people in the background, who are larger than the forward figures despite being much further
away. Impossible, due to a little thing called the law of perspective.
Plus, that is tagged as the Mandelas at Sisulu’s wedding. If the Mandelas married, we should
have pictures of them from their own wedding. So why are we looking at someone else’s
wedding pictures?
Finally, remind yourself that Mase was a close relation of Sisulu, meaning that Sisulu (read
Dickinson) not only set Mandela up with his job at Sidelsky, but set Mandela up with a wife.
Most straight guys can find their own wives, and want to. But not Mandela. Look at him in that
photo. Yes, it is fake, but even so they have pasted him standing well to the side of Mase, not
even touching her. I would say it is another clue.
We are seeing the usual misdirection on this question, which indicates the usual conclusion:
Mandela was a gay Jewish actor. Remember, they admit Mandela and his buddy Justice fled to
Johannesburg to avoid arranged marriages. Mandela and Justice had been hanging out all along,
going to school together and so on. As Thembu royalty, Nelson and Justice should have been
able to have as many wives as they wanted, but they apparently didn’t want even one. They
preferred to be actors.
I have to think there must have been rumours of this in Africa, because when Mandela later
married Graca, it looks the directors told them to ham it up: there are hardly any pictures of them
not holding hands or hugging. It goes too far in the other direction, and they did everything but
film them in bed, like John and Yoko.
Anyway, let’s return to the story at Wikipedia. It was at this time that Mandela became a top
officer of the ANC youth league. Which leads us to insert this question no one ever asks. When
Malan took power in 1948, his National Party was allegedly as far right as it was possible to be,
openly hostile to any black rights. So why did they put up with the ANC and its calls for direct
action against Apartheid? ANC allegedly got more militant in this period. If what we are told is
true, Malan should have shut that down with maximum force. But he didn’t. Why not? I am
telling you why: the ANC was always controlled opposition. It appears to have been infiltrated
by the British later, but even before they took over, the Dutch had manned ANC with these oreo
cookies like Mandela and Sisulu, who were agents of the ruling class. This is the way it is
always done and we have seen it a million times. We saw it in my papers on the Black Panthers
and Nation of Islam*, which were and still are headed by puppets of the billionaire Jews.
Also interesting is that after being kicked out of the University of Fort Hare, Mandela later failed
his final year at Witwatersrand three times, leaving without a degree in 1949 at age 31. I find it
surprising this is admitted, and I put it down to it being 1949. If this had been 1989, they would
simply have faked all his degrees. See Barack Obama.
You will tell me Malan did use the general strike of 1950 to pass more fascist legislation and put
more police on the street—which was of course its purpose—but the question is why didn’t
Malan forcibly shut down the ANC and deport its leadership? Now you know.
In 1952 they planted Mandela at the Basner law firm, although he still didn’t have a degree.
Basner was another Communist Jew, of course. Hyman Meir Basner was from Russia, had
gotten his law degree at UCLA, and was a Communist Party member, telling us he was a ranking
spook. He founded the African Democratic Party in 1943 and was also involved with India.
Basner died in England, telling us which side to put him on. Also note the name Meir, which
links us to. . . Golda Meir. This is why the Israelis appear in these stories, sometimes cloaked,
but always working for the Brits.
If you still aren’t following me, read closely this quote from Wiki:
At a Durban rally on 22 June, Mandela addressed an assembled crowd of 10,000,
initiating the campaign protests, for which he was arrested and briefy interned in
Marshall Square prison.[81] These events established Mandela as one of the bestknown black political fgures in South Africa.
So the police let that go on and only arrested him after he addressed the crowd? That was nice of
them. And he was briefly interned. Briefly. Let me guess? Eight days? Ask yourself why they
didn’t deport him, banish him, or beat him senseless? I’ll tell you why: they wanted to establish
him as one of the best-known political figures in the country. Better him—who they were in
control of—than a real revolutionary. The best way to squelch a real revolution is to create a
fake one.
Finally, in 1952 Mandela was arrested and stood trial under the Suppression of Communism Act,
but again skated. He was given a suspended sentence. Mandela was banned from attending
ANC meetings, but then we are told Kunene read Mandela’s speech at a meeting in September of
1953. What? How does that makes any sense? Why didn’t the government shut down the
ANC?
Next we are told Mandela became an attorney. How does that work? He failed coursework at
Witwatersrand three times, and he was studying law there. How can you fail out of law school
and still become a lawyer? Are we supposed to believe that in South Africa in the 1950s there
were no requirements for taking the law exam?
They admit Mandela wasn’t close to his wife Evelyn, spending no time with her, but it doesn’t
matter because she was busy with her own spook life as a Jehovah’s Witness. Like Prince, she
used her notoriety to spread disinformation as widely as possible.
Now we are up to 1955, and Mandela is allegedly pushing for an armed uprising. Right. In
support of that, a Freedom Charter was drawn up by Lionel Bernstein. What? These collegeeducated blacks from royal families can’t write their own manifestoes? As usual, the
scriptwriters of history don’t bother to tell a believable story. Lionel Bernstein was Jewish of
course, orphaned at eight years old of course—so they don’t have to tell us who his parents were.
We are told they were emigres from Europe, but no names or places are given. However, there
is an Oscar Lionel Bernstein of the right age to be his father listed at Geni, from Los Angeles.
He is probably related to Leonard Bernstein. There are also Bernsteins in the peerage, the
Barons of Craigweil. They are connected to Nicolas Serota, current head of the Tate Modern in
London, through Angela Beveridge. They are also related to the Berkeleys, Earls of Berkeley;
the Drummonds, Earls of Melfort; the MacKenzies, Earls of Seaforth; the Stuarts, Dukes of
Lennox; the Campbells, Dukes of Argyll; the Gordons, Earls of Huntly; the Hamiltons, Earls of
Arran; the Douglases, Earls of Morton; and the Keiths, Earls Marischal. Does that list look
familiar? We just saw three of those prominent families linked to Albert Dickinson above, and
thereby to Sisulu and Mandela.
Like Mandela, Bernstein had a bye with the courts. He was charged with sedition in 1946 and
convicted, but received a suspended sentence. Really? A suspended sentence for sedition? In
1956 he was arrested for treason in the famous Treason Trial. The trial lasted four years, after
which everyone was acquitted and released. That’s convenient. In 1963 he was arrested again,
this time with Mandela, and became part of the famous Rivonia Trial. He was the only one
found not guilty and released. Bernstein then went to London, and later Oxford, where he lived
for decades, telling us who he really was and what side he was on. Notice that he did not retire
to Amsterdam or Eindhoven.
After the Treason Trial, Mandela allegedly worked as a chauffeur, traveling around the country
incognito. Right. I guess he traveled in whiteface? As you are already seeing, the story at this
point goes completely off the rails, and the desperate scriptwriters are forced to borrow from
Orczy’s novel, calling Mandela the Black Pimpernel. Really pathetic. They also claim he was
inspired by Castro’s uprising in Cuba, Che Guevara, etc. The problem there is I have already
exposed those guys as fakes and Jewish fronts as well. They admit Mandela went to England in
1962 to meet with anti-Apartheid activists, but we now know who he was really meeting: various
earls and dukes. There he was prepped on the next phase of the play:
When he got back they immediately arrested him for inciting strikes. The court proceedings are
the usual farce, since although Mandela was allegedly a lawyer, he acted more like Anders
Breivik or Charles Manson, wearing a hairy animal hide (kaross) in court, refusing to call
witnesses, and grandstanding loudly and obnoxiously on political topics outside the matter at
hand. Despite being known to be the head of a militant group, he was sentenced to only five
years. We are told they moved him from Johannesburg to a Pretoria jail so that Winnie could
visit him. What? Is that the way it usually works? They move black prisoners for the benefit of
their wives?
Apparently that fake trial didn’t really impress anyone, so they decided to up the ante. They
started another trial—the Rivonia Trial—the very next year, accusing Mandela of plotting to
overthrow the government. Most of that evidence was taken from the Liliesleaf Farm of Arthur
Goldreich, who just happened to be an elite Israeli soldier of the Palmach, which is sort of like
the Green Berets or Seals. At age 33 he was sent to South Africa, where his cover was being an
artist. Oivay caramba. When not painting (haha), he was busy having secret ANC meetings on
his farm, and also apparently storing lots of incriminating documents and tapes in easy-to-find
boxes, for the convenience of the police. Goldreich was also arrested, but he escaped from jail
on August 11, Chai, disguised as a priest. Can you believe they expect us to believe this shit?
Anyway, since according to mainstream history, Mandela was plotting the overthrow of the
government, the evidence piled to the Moon. So why wasn’t he hanged? We aren’t told. He
wasn’t given a life sentence because South Africa was too shy to give the death penalty. We
know from many other (also fake) stories that South Africa liked to kill blacks for major crimes,
as a warning. Same story we got in the US in those decades and before. In fact, they admit the
penalty for high treason at the time was death. We are supposed to believe that defense attorney
Hanson convinced judge de Wet in private chambers to “commute” the sentence to life. This
means someone doesn’t know the meaning of the word “commute”. The presiding judge cannot
commute a sentence, by definition, since the judge is the one doing the original sentencing. The
judge has to follow the law, and if the law says the penalty for high treason is death, he has to
apply that law. It then takes a second party to commute the sentence, and that party is not a
judicial party, but an executive party, like the President or Governor. No president, governor, or
other official or group commuted Mandela’s sentence, so it is not clear how he was sentenced to
life.
Also, why was Mandela allowed to give a three-hour speech (“I am prepared to die”) at the
beginning of the trial? That isn’t normal court proceeding. In a real trial, someone in the stand
must respond to questioning. They don’t get to blab without end. Do you think the State
arrested these people so that they could make three-hour speeches in court which could be
immediately printed in the newspapers and quoted on TV? This is all the evidence you need that
the trial was manufactured.
But why would they end the Mandela project like that in 1963, putting their actor on ice for 27
years? Probably because their cover was blown. These British/Jewish peers got caught by their
Dutch cousins and were forced to back off for a few years and regroup. The script they wrote
from London in 1962 blew up in their faces. My guess is that once their cover was blown, the
British spooks whisked Mandela out of South Africa, and he was really in England after 1963,
perhaps camped out in the countryside, maybe near Oxford? This means that although the
Afrikaners thought Mandela was their own asset in those previous years, controlling the
opposition, he was actually a British asset for most of that time. But I don’t think the Afrikaners
understood that until sometime after 1962-3.
Because we have to remember that things really got nasty after that. These covert projects of the
50s and early 60s had failed, so the various factions of the Phoenician Navy had to resort to
semi-open warfare. Also, the American faction got more heavily involved at that time, backing
up their British cousins. That is what the whole Cuban thing was about. Remember, in the
1970s this skirmish spread to neighboring countries, including Angola, where Cuba sent in
18,000 troops to prop up the MPLA. Cuba sent even more troops in the 80s. Didn’t that ever
seem strange to you? Cuba? Cuba was fighting South Africa in Angola? How does that make
any sense. For those few who ever asked that question, the answer given by the fake mainstream
historians was of course that the Soviets were behind it. But that is the usual cover story. Who
had a giant base on Cuba at the time? Not the Soviets. The US ran Guantanamo Base then and
still runs it. So of course it was the US funneling troops into Angola, not Cuba or the Soviets. I
will be told that the US and UK were allies of South Africa during those decades, but that was all
a feint. The CIA wanted South Africa to think the US was its ally, but the US and UK have
always wanted the Dutch out of South Africa. Even now that is the plan, and that is why the
country is being allowed to crumble—something my guest writer couldn’t understand. It is being
made inhospitable to whites on purpose, to drive the rich Dutch out for good. Once the last of
them have packed up and vacated, the country can be re-purposed for its rich English/American
owners. I would assume the Indians like the Guptas are just being used for this purpose as well.
They are interim hooligans, allowed to prosper temporarily as part of Operation Chaos, so that
they can take the blame. But once the Dutch are driven out, the Indians will be given the boot as
well.
If I am right, then de Klerk—despite appearing to be Dutch—must have been a British asset.
You will say his family had been running South Africa for years, but these things happen. So we
look first to his mother, where we find my guess confirmed: she was a Coetzer, so it possible the
de Klerk lines were attacked through her. Coetzer is a more obviously Jewish name than de
Klerk, and comes from different lines than the de Klerks were used to. Coetzer comes from
Germany and Austria. Always follow the ladies, as I have told you before. My guess is
confirmed by the amount of misdirection around this question. At Wiki, de Klerk is sold as
mainly French Huguenot, though he “notes” he is also of Dutch descent. Absurd, as usual, since
he is Jewish on both sides, the only question being what lines. He wouldn’t be running a country
if he weren’t mainly Jewish. Although the de Klerks had previously been of mainly Dutch lines,
Coetzer introduced a different line.
I would assume his wife Marike was involved in this switch as well, and that too is confirmed by
major misdirection on his Wiki page, where she is neither listed in the sidebar nor given a last
name in the text. Very strange. A search on her takes us to more mystery, since she was
supposedly murdered in 2001. See this report from the Guardian, which again conspicuously
fails to tell us her birth name. Strange, since she was long divorced and was therefore no longer
Mrs. de Klerk. The article is obvious agitprop in many other ways as well, since—instead of
reporting facts as a newspaper should—it instead is crammed with emotionalism and spin.
Unspinning it leads me to believe her death was faked for some reason, and given what I am
showing you, we should assume it was faked to get her off the page. They didn’t want you
asking the questions I am asking. Which makes me ask them even louder. What was her maiden
name? Geni tells us it was Willemse, and if we continue back we find Heyns, Eksteen, Smal,
Human, Rademayer, Muller, Adams, and Kemp. This last confirms my guess, since the Kemps
were from Suffolk. This probably links us to the Kemps of the peerage, who were baronets
related to the Bacon baronets, and through them to the Berkeleys, Wodehouses, Hamiltons,
Egertons, and Phipps. We saw the Berkeleys and Hamiltons above, didn’t we? The Kemps were
Barons Rochdale in the 20th century, and they were directors of Barclays Bank. The 1st Viscount
Kemp was governor of the BBC in the 1950s. Marike was also descended from a John Adams,
which may link us to President Adams.** The names Rademayer and Muller are German. On
the paternal side, Marike’s grandmother is given as a Weyers, but my guess is that is a fudge of
Meyers. She is immediately scrubbed, giving more weight to that guess. Her great-grandmother
is also scrubbed. The paternal lines are almost empty. So best guess is the de Klerks were
infiltrated through F. W. de Klerk’s mother and wife, explaining why he is the one that released
Mandela from jail—i.e. brought him back from England.
In support of that, we can check Marike’s father, W. A. Willemse, who has his own Wiki page,
though it is in Afrikaans. He was from a family of bankers and worked in a bank for a while.
After obtaining an MA in psychology from the University of Pretoria, he continued his studies in
Leipzig, Bonn, and Berlin, and came home with two doctorates. He specialized in criminology
and prisons. That is enough red flags already, but we find more. His second wife after Heyns
was Flora Strachan, who was close friends with the famous poet Elisabeth Eybers. Her mother
was English, being a le Roux. They are related to the Nugent baronets and the Bailey barons—
who link us to the Russells and Lathams. We saw the Lathams above. Willemse was allegedly
killed in a freak car accident at age 40, run over by one of his own students. But I would assume
his death was faked and that he went deeper into Intel. He looks like a spook from the first word.
Marike’s brothers are scrubbed, so they may have also been in British Intelligence. That would
explain many things, including the bad script of her death, which reads like it is right out of MI6.
Remember, she was allegedly choked to death on her knees, but also had a knife sticking out of
her back. The only thing they forgot was the cobra chewing on her ankle.
On the way out, let’s take a quick look at Winnie Mandela. Her parents were named Columbus
and Gertrude—not African names, obviously. It is admitted she is at least one-quarter white, and
we may assume the white is mostly Jewish. She graduated from the Hofmeyr School, and
Hofmeyr is of course Jewish. I assume Winnie was chosen as a new beard for Mandela, since by
1958 Evelyn was sick of that job. The job was easier for Winnie, since after 1962 Mandela was
always in jail—meaning, he was in England. But of course Winnie didn’t have to go with him.
She was free to run her own projects. It looks to me like she became an agent of the Dutch rather
than the British, and that is understandable given that otherwise her position in South Africa
during the 70s and 80s would have become untenable. But picking that side cost her dearly after
1990, when the rulers flipped. The Brits of course had no use for her, so she was dumped as the
wife/beard. And no longer having the protection of the government, she was open for a series of
neverending attacks, in court and everywhere else. She may have been a nasty character, and as
an agent no doubt she was, but to me the various events looks manufactured, including all the
murders by her bodyguards. As the country began transitioning from Dutch to English rule, no
doubt she needed bodyguards. But for the rest, it all looks like the usual blackwashing. That is
confirmed by the court proceedings, where she was actually tried for the Seipei case in 1991, and
ended up with only a fine. If she had actually done any of the things she was accused of, the new
government would have crucified her. As it is, all they had were stories.
Even as late as 2003 the new government had the chance to throw the book at her, on the charges
of theft. But once again all her convictions were overturned or suspended. You will say it is
because she still had powerful friends, but if she had had powerful friends in government, they
would have buried the claims to start with. They would have never made it to the papers or the
courts. This indicates the government only wanted to ruin her reputation. They had no desire to
actually send her to jail, since that would have been to create a martyr.
As just one example of the stupidity of these stories, we are told this:
During the 1990s, she associated with Israeli organised crime fgures operating in South
Africa, who were involved in extorting the local Jewish community, and other criminal
activity.
That’s completely upside down to all sense, as usual. As an agent, Winnie would have been
involved in lots of covert projects over the decades, but not in an Israeli extortion from the local
Jewish community! Maybe in extorting from everyone else to benefit the local Jewish
community, but not otherwise.
I suspect this semi-rehabilitation of Winnie will piss off more people even than my outing of
Mandela as an agent, but I just tell it like I see it. I am not here to pick sides, I am here to flip all
the lies over, no matter what they may be.
