‘GMO’ food isn’t actually ‘genetically modified.’ It’s physically, chemically, and energetically violated.
Fri 10:42 am +00:00, 25 Jul 2025 6
Source: https://x.com/RameseSanders/status/1948069943075049890?t=Rv9GDg9W8EVdFelXvUjGwA&s=09
1/ Most people think ‘genetic engineering’ means precise ‘gene’ editing. But ‘genes’ have never been proven to exist in accordance to the scientific method. So what are they really doing?
2/ They expose seeds to: – Radiation – Metals – Toxic chemicals – EMF’s – And altered environments What’s happening is forced physical, chemical, and energetic manipulation that alters the plant’s features or survival traits — not them ‘modifying genes.’
3/ Then they grow these manipulated seeds in: – Glyphosate-soaked soil – Synthetic fertilizers – Man-made environments And call the result ‘safe and climate-friendly.
4/ ‘GMO’ is just a marketing term. It’s not innovation — it’s lifeless food, toxic soil, and disconnection from nature. They sell it as cool science so you’ll cheer for your own destruction. Eat high quality real whole foods and nourish your body. Stay cognizant!
Related:
The shocking transformation of the UK household diet since 1980
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1qbkL-Iff8
I left the UK i n 1997 and even then I and people I knew were buying organic food. It may be more expensive, but it depends where your priorities lie.
I hate the word organic when referring to our food. In my day, hell, everything was “organic.”
Very true Gordon
I was a director/owner of a small private food company back in the days of the organic pioneers. Of which we were one. We had high ethical standards and would never cheat. The principles were good [zero chemicals or drugs]. But I always suspected the methods of the wider industry. They relied on self certification and supplier “audits” back then, probably still do. The regulators role was minimal. Which “regulator” is above board and can be trusted in any event? Money always talks. It was a very easy system for the unscrupulous to cheat. In an industry where cheating was rife….
For example, I once employed an ex-corporate senior manager who told me all about his previous company’s nefarious methods regarding labels of origin. They were a large Brit based multinational. “Italian” produce that actually came from unregulated China, via Italy, that sort of thing. I’d imagine that “organic” was similar, even more so now given the higher retail price
The only way to be certain is to know the supplier, ideally the producer, intimately. For a consumer that means local. For anything else it’s anybody’s guess
Yes Pete, I only buy food that is locally grown and we’re fortunate in having plenty of choice here. I don’t think anything marked ‘organic’ which comes from abroad is to be trusted.
Quite right, Gordon, my parents wouldn’t have known what the word meant in that context. However, times have changed radically and it’s the only way now to differentiate between what is poison and what is less poisonous.
We know the air and the ground water is polluted but I prefer to eat food that’s not been treated chemically. A fruit grower whom I know laments the fact that he loses a lot of his produce to birds who won’t touch the other trees in the area.