Why Isn’t The UN Stopping Israel?
Thu 3:27 pm +00:00, 10 Jul 2025 3Palestine and the UN have been inextricably linked since the organization was founded. Its departments have been criticizing Israel’s actions for over a year. UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese even wrote two reports documenting the genocide in Gaza – yet, despite that, the United Nations has still been unable to hold Israel accountable.
Albanese explains how Israel is conducting a settler colonial genocide, how international law works, and encourages countries in the Global South to come together and work to liberate Palestinians like they did during apartheid South Africa.
See also:
Q. Can anyone out there stand up and honestly tell me this treatment of the Palestinian people is right?
A. Yes! Only a Zionist.
Because Israel and the UN were always part of the same Zionist project. Both were Zionist objectives post WW2 and both were created at that time as part of the ongoing globalists project
UN undermined national sovereignty. They had two stabs at it, first the League of Nations which failed because the American pols were not fully under control at that time. They had gained fuller control post WW2 by the time the UN was formed. The UN building is built on Rockefeller land, and the Rockefellers are US proxies for the Rothschilds…
Israel undermined, often exploded, Middle East national sovereignty. And is still doing all the same things that it has always done, even now. In fact it’s even more in your face this century. Israel is a Rothschild project too of course. Balfour’s famous declaration was written to a Rothschild after all. This signified their complete control over Brit politics..
Because Britain had literally ZERO national interest in facilitating the Zionist project. Nonetheless Britain took on the Palestinian “Mandate” [a legal fudge] for the best part of 20 years, and funded the whole caboosh. By acting as the proxy for the Zionists and eventually arming them to the teeth to enable them to seize the land of Palestine with their genocidal Nakba. Then the Brits left, job done. The local Semitic Palestinians knew their bible and Torah too, so they knew what was coming and fled in their hundreds of thousands becoming refugees in neighbouring countries. Conveniently undermining their national sovereignty at the same time…
Douglas Reed is very clear about all this in his very informative book “Controversy of Zion”. He explains the whole history of Talmudic Zionism, right back to 500 BC or earlier. In essence, the Talmud was a means of subverting, in fact inverting, the Torah, which is basically the New Testament and has the same 10 commandments. The Talmud gives them permission to ignore them all, and they do
Thank you Pete for taking the time to write this informative explanation, it really does go a long way in explaining the situation. I do wish that the world would wake up to the reality and do something about it.
I do have your recommended book The Controversy of Zion and have read a few pages, but heck, I never seem to have enough time to read it because my life is just one thing after another all day, every day.
Thanks again.
It’s a pleasure Gordon, particularly for someone like you whose heart is so very much in the right place. So I’m very glad to be of service
I’d wish the same as you too but I’m not expecting that anytime soon. The propaganda is off the charts and their objectives have been so completely achieved that now we can’t criticise the tribe in public. Reed predicted that outcome if I recall. And he wrote the book in 1953!
The book is a very intense and long read, I had to read it three times to absorb it all. I learned more and more each time I read it too. The biblical quotes blew my mind
My main criticisms would be:
First, that he was a journalist, not a historian, so it lacks disciplined reference notes
Second that he barely touches upon the money power which is obviously integral to the modern part of the story
He had direct experience that there is a power so pervasive that it cannot be denied, he gives numerous examples from 20thC. And he wrote the book with the deliberate intention of it being his postscript, and published after his death. Probably because he knew, he gives many examples in the book, that to publish when alive would very likely have been catastrophic for him personally
As for being too busy then, you’ve got your priorities right! Living in the natural, real, world and in the moment as much as possible is the way to go in this crazy, false, media driven, mad world
Best wishes
Pete