Science? Schmience….
Sun 10:31 am +00:00, 18 May 2025Source: https://milesmathis.com/science.pdf
His links at the above link
=========
My Science Site
by Miles Mathis
May 16, 2025
I was just going to put up a link to my science site, to remind you that if you run out of things to read
here on my art/history site, there are about 800 other papers on my science site, going back 25 years,
and not all of them are full of difficult math. There is a link at the top of my homepage, of course, but
most people never visit that—they just bookmark my updates page. So some don’t even know I have a
second site. I do this now because I have posted a lot of papers this year so far over there, and most of
them are short and don’t require much knowledge of science. They are just me dunking on the
mainstream, so the same thing you find on this site but with a science flavor. Mainstream physics is
currently imploding after years of being strafed by me, and even mainstream scientists on Youtube and
other places are starting to admit that, see Sabine Hossenfelder as just one example. She doesn’t
promote me, of course, that isn’t allowed, but she is admitting physics, astronomy, and science
academia are in a freefall, and may not survive in their current forms. So these are very interesting
times, and I didn’t want you to miss out on the fun.
But then I thought, why just leave a raw link when I can flesh it out a bit, perhaps helping you to
understand what is really going on. Most of you know me as the guy who is blowing the cover of
every Intelligence project in history, but some in the know think my science is even more important
and revolutionary, and they are probably right. So if you haven’t spent any time over there or don’t
have any science chops, I will give you a thumbnail sketch of why they think that.
My science site has been quietly superviral for many years now. By “quietly” I mean almost no one
knows it, because I am not promoted by anyone but me. The mainstream has not only refused to cover
any of my big discoveries, they have refused to report on my astonishing success online—which is just
as incredible a story. The only ones who know it are people at Google, the Air Force, NASA, and
places like that, and they aren’t happy about it. They have been trying to put a lid on it since the
beginning, and it got very serious about six years ago, when Google began completing delisting me.
Not just downlisting me, but refusing to list me at all. Other search engines like Bing and Yahoo then
followed. We knew this was true since at first we could compare Google to Bing, and when Bing
began delisting me we could compare to Yandex, which was still listing based on numbers, as they
should. Now Yandex has started delisting me, so I guess you will have to get your information in the
future from toilet stalls.
On my art/history site, you have seen evidence of that as well, since I have posted recent screenshots
proving my papers are going to #1 immediately at Yandex, and sometimes even at Google and Bing.
That happened with my paper on the fake Trump assassination attempt, for example. And there are a
few of my old papers on both sites Google has failed to censor. I have so many papers up some of
them miss the net, I guess.
At that last link you can see that I was ranking above Wikipedia, the Dictionary, and all university sites
on many topics, which was unheard of. I saved some of the screenshots as proof. It had never been
achieved by anyone, but especially not by a one-man self-published site with no institutional
connections. This was of major concern to the mainstream, because up to then their response had been
to ignore me and claim I was a crank with no penetration. But the Google results disproved that with
huge exclamation points. And my numbers could not have been due to ignorant “Flat Earth” readers,
as they claimed, since my most-read papers were on subjects only professional physicists or
astronomers or mathematicians could comprehend. Youtube dopes would not be clicking on papers
with titles like “The Drude-Sommerfeld Model”, “The Perihelion of Mercury”, or “The Fractional
Quantum Hall Effect”. No, this indicated that mainstream scientists from the universities and labs were
secretly mobbing my papers, reading them at home under the covers with a flashlight and then denying
it at work.
The catastrophe for the mainstream went into overdrive in 2020, when I made a big prediction about
Solar Cycle 25, which was just starting at that time. The mainstream also tries to dismiss me by
claiming I don’t make any predictions and don’t reference mainstream experiments, which was always a
lie—but the lie got much bigger in 2020. I have never done anything else except go through
mainstream papers and theories with a fine-tooth comb, correcting them, rewriting them, and showing
my readers exactly what it must mean. Same thing I do on my history site. But in 2020 I was able to
do what no one had ever done: predict a Solar Cycle by first explaining the mechanism and then
showing how that mechanism physically created the data. That paper is pretty dense and you may not
be able to follow it. Lots of graphs. But the long and short of it was that I showed the cycle was
caused by an electromagnetic feedback loop between the Galactic Core, the Sun and the four big
planets. So all I had to do is track the big planets, looking at alignments. When the planets were most
in line to the Sun/Core, we would have a maximum. I then simply predicted sharp spikes in the
sunspot data on planetary alignments. There have been six of those so far in this cycle, and they all hit
right on schedule, which was like shooting the mainstream in the heart six times. After the first one
hit, mainstream scientists at NOAA and NASA and places like that were so panicked they called Air
Force for help, which took over sunspot counting for the first time ever. It was soon clear why Air
Force was there: they began faking all the data, sitting on sunspots numbers to make it look like I
wasn’t right. Sunspots can be very small or very large, so their favorite trick was to mis-weigh the big
ones, counting them as about half as large as they should have been. I have proved that in a series of
papers. Even with that trick, they still failed to keep numbers down enough, and Cycle 25 was MUCH
larger than they predicted. But pretty much exactly what I predicted. Even better, their trick of
suppressing big spots didn’t get rid of the spikes on planetary alignments, I guess because Air Force
didn’t get the memo to hit those days extra hard. They only got the general memo to suppress by about
75% across the board, but didn’t realize there were specific spikes to suppress. So those spikes
remained in the data, proving I was right.
But I have done things much larger than that, starting with diagramming the atomic nucleus. There
were a few attempts to do that back in the 1940s, but but they soon gave up. Their data was very
limited, and more importantly they were terrible at visualization. Physicists in the 20th century were
generally very limited math geeks, especially the ones in theory, and they were the least artistic
scientists in history. This is because of the influence of Bohr and Heisenberg, mainly, who taught
physicists to avoid diagrams and illustrations. They hated them. And they hated them because they
couldn’t read them. Their brains didn’t work like that and they honestly couldn’t fathom diagrams.
Mach admitted he was confused by the real world and feared walking into distant mountains. No
really, I am not making that up. And Bohr wasn’t much better. These guys were just short of legally
blind.
So when I came along in about 2000, the standing nuclear diagram was just a bag of marbles. If you
consulted nuclear theory, you were told all the protons and neutrons inhabited the same spot. Yes, they
dodged into the quantum blur thing there as well, just like with their orbiting electrons. Everything was
a probability and you shouldn’t even try to visual anything. It couldn’t be done, they told us. Nature
didn’t make sense and you were a fool to expect it to.
But I never bought it. Everyone with any sense always knew that couldn’t be right. And I had a leg up
in the problem beyond being an artist, because I knew going in that the nucleus was channeling the
charge field through it. No one else before me knew that, so they couldn’t build the nucleus as a charge
engine. So once again I had a mechanical hook no one else had. I knew why the nucleus was built like
it was even before I built it, you see. I knew the architecture had to channel charge.
And what is this charge I am always talking about? It is the old +/- on the proton and electron, that the
mainstream already knew about, so I didn’t make it up. I just made it a real field of real photons. The
mainstream had known about charge since the time of Ben Franklin, but no one had ever thought to
make it a real field of real particles. It was just treated as a propensity or something. As with
diagramming the nucleus, they had given up trying to explain charge long long ago. In the 1990s it was
defined as a message between particles. No, seriously. A message. Through Facebook, I guess.
Historically, it was Maxwell’s old D-field, and as such was just more math. It was a ghostly field that
lay under the EM field, but since Maxwell never figured out exactly what it was, and since his students
were way dumber than he was, they just buried it. Basically no one talked it about for 150 years until I
dug it up and re-animated it, showing it was the primary real field in the universe, the greater part in a
unified field theory, and 95% of all current energy.
In most of the problems I solve, it is overlooked as ambient heat. It is real photons peaking in the
infrared, so it is mostly out-of-sight and invisible. It remains even in a vacuum, since a vacuum is an
ion vacuum. You can’t create a charge vacuum, since whatever you make your walls out of will still be
emitting charge. Plus, everything is porous to charge. And on the Earth, everything is in the Earth’s
heavy charge field. Physicists always forget that, which is why they can’t ever explain anything, from
entanglement to the double-slit experiment to dark matter. All their theories are missing 95% of the
total field.
So you can think of charge as a powerful photon gas that drives and animates all things. Like the
Force, if you will, but completely real, made up of real particles with real masses, real radii and real
spins. It determines the architecture of everything, starting with the nucleus. The nucleus is built for
one thing and one thing only: to channel charge. At each atomic number, you will find a specific
architecture that channels charge the most efficiently at that size. The nucleus has to be built this way
because if it is built wrong, the charge field will quickly tear it apart, from inside and out. Any
imbalance will be fatal. It is like building a house in a high wind or powerful wind tunnel, but in this
case you let the wind move both around the house and through it.
You start by building the rooms of the house. In the atomic nucleus, these rooms are mostly the same:
Helium nuclei. That is just two protons and two neutrons in a bulletproof configuration, allowing
charge to move right through the structure—in at the poles and out the equator. You then build up all
nuclei from those rooms, taking great care to place adjacent rooms in the right configuration, to allow
charge to channel through while pushing the rooms together at the same time. Yes, if you fit the rooms
together in the right way, the charge acts like a glue, keeping the house super-tight. It isn’t an actual
glue, it just presses things together, again like a very strong wind.
What else have I done that no one had before? Well, I solved the mystery of superposition. The
mainstream has known that a particle may have two states at the same time, one state “superimposed”
on the other. Meaning, one right on top of the other somehow. But how? That they couldn’t say.
Again, they just dealt with it mathematically, but didn’t try to explain it physically, because they
couldn’t. They often resorted to just calling the states red/blue or something, since they couldn’t
distinguish them with real mechanics. This ended up infecting everything, including most famously
quark theory, where they promoted this mechanical ignorance as a sexy novelty, calling quarks
top/bottom, charmed, or strange. People then got Nobel prizes for that mess and it was cemented into
place permanently. Like everything else, you weren’t allowed to question it.
Their superposition math usually worked, since they had fit it to experiments over many years, but in
some experiments it stopped working. Things started happening that didn’t make any sense. Detectors
were detecting things they shouldn’t have. To explain these “weird” findings, they used even more
slippery math, summing over all possible states to again find probabilities. To go with that slippery
math, they added equally slippery interpretations, by which a particle was going through two slits at the
same time, or maybe even taking all possible paths, with all possible spins. The real result was then
“decohering” out of the vacuum by some magic, the magic usually requiring you to look at it. Before
you looked at it, it was just a blur, but with an observer it entered the universe and took one form
instead of all the others.
No really. That was really the state of physics in the 20th century, and still is. Murray Gell-Mann,
probably the third most famous physicist since 1920, after Hawking and Feynman, thought even Mars
was a probability, and said so in his 1994 book The Quark and the Jaguar. It didn’t really exist until
someone looked at it in a telescope. You may think these guys were just taking a piss, and maybe they
were, but if so they have never admitted it. That is still mainstream physics.
So how did I solve it? Very simply, as usual, starting with drawing a picture, which allowed me to see
that the two superimposed states weren’t just math, they were real spins. But they weren’t two similar
spins, just pasted on top of one another; they were spins in different planes and of different sizes. The
inner spin was an axial spin, like a basketball player spinning a basketball. But the outer spin was endover-end, like a car crashing in a spectacular Hollywood scene. This was done to get the second spin
outside the influence of the inner spin. The outer spin has a radius twice that of the inner, so they don’t
interfere with one another. This puts the outer spin in another plane, and that plane is at a right angle to
the first spin.
This explains the weird experiments, because it explains why some detectors were detecting the inner
spin while others were detecting the outer spin. The detector is in one plane or another, but not both, so
you have to track which spin it will be detecting. Sometimes it won’t detect anything, when you think
it would, and that is because it is in the wrong plane.
You can see how that is a bit tricky, and why they would have missed it for a century without the right
illustration. It becomes pretty obvious with a good illustration, but as I have said, these guys weren’t
artists. They weren’t visual at all. They were the nerds who thought a lime green polyester shirt went
with orange slacks, so how are they going to see stacked spins?
What next? How about unification. This was the big project of Einstein and for a long time it was the
biggest unsolved problem of physics. Still would be if I hadn’t solved it, but they gave up on it a long
time ago. Einstein made no real progress on it, and those that came after just mucked it more and
more, until they finally decided to pretend it didn’t matter. By 1990 they had given up on unification
and began replacing it with containment. That is what gauge theories are: they no longer even claim to
unify, they just claim to put gravity and EM in the same big operators and call it a day. They put
gravity and EM in the same room and claim they have achieved a marriage. Though they can’t say how
copulation would ever occur. These new gauge solutions don’t allow them to answer any real
mechanical questions, since they contain no mechanics. It just gives them another opportunity to dump
an endless ugly math on you, like String Theory.
How did I solve that one? Well, I turned the problem inside out, showing that they didn’t even need to
unify gravity and EM (electromagnetism) since they were already unified without anyone knowing it.
You see, they weren’t really trying to unify gravity and EM, they were trying to unify Newton’s gravity
equations with Maxwell’s EM equations. Seems like the same thing, but it isn’t because as it turns out,
Newton’s gravity equations were already unified. Same for Maxwell’s equations. Newton had fit his
equation to an experimental result, and that result was due to a compound field, that field being unified.
But because Newton predated the EM field, he had no way of knowing that. Later in the 19th century,
when EM arose, no one realized that EM had been hiding in Newton’s equations all along, hidden by
the constant G. So I started out years ago unwinding G, showing what it really was. Until I came
along, G was just an unassigned constant. No one had any idea what it was. It made the equation
work, that is all. It filled a hole in the equation. But I realized that constant had to be representing
something. More than that, I recognized it must be representing a second field in the equation. A
whole other thing the mainstream had missed for centuries. With some more work, I was able to match
it in size to the EM field. I showed it fit the known size of the EM field, based on known values like
the Ampere, the Joule, the Coulomb, and so on.
So instead of unifying Newton’s equations and Maxwell’s equations, which were already unified, what
was necessary was pulling apart the old equations and showing what they really stood for. Once all the
variable and constants were re-assigned to real parameters, we could put them back together, achieving
re-unification that way. We then didn’t have just one unified field equation, we had many. Not only
were Newton’s and Maxwell’s equations unified, Gauss’ equations were unified as well, and so was the
Lagrangian.
Which brings us to that. Unlocking the Lagrangian is another of the biggest things I have done. I
really don’t expect you to get through that one, but I think I can give you the gist. They sell the
Lagrangian as advanced math, but it is actually pretty simple. It is just an energy equation, like
Newton’s equations and Maxwell’s equations. Until I came along, it was thought to be an equation that
summed kinetic energy and potential energy. Kinetic energy is just the energy an object or particle has
due to motion, and potential energy is energy due to position. Think of a rock on a high mountain: it
has potential energy due to that position, because if it comes loose, it will fall, creating a lot of energy
release in its crash. Anyway, in the 18th century the mainstream came up with a total energy equation
for an object or system that they called the Lagrangian. It had come out of Newton’s pretty simple oneterm gravity equation, but had a second term that also came out of the Principia. Newton quickly
realized his equation had limited application, especially in celestial mechanics, so he began tweaking it
to match data. He got about 75-80% in and then gave up, but others took up the problem after he died,
making a bit more progress on it. What they ultimately came up with was the Lagrangian, a two-part
equation where the second part looked like Newton’s equation and the first part resembled a kinetic
energy equation. So they just assumed that is what it was. That assumption didn’t make much sense,
because you can’t subtract potential energy from kinetic energy in a total energy equation. Or, you can,
but you should just get zero. That was according to Newton himself. However, Newton had misassigned one of his corrections, and the guys that came after him were much dumber than he was, so
they just kept making the same mistake for 300 years, never questioning the logic of it.
But after discovering that Newton’s first equation was already unified, I knew that the Lagrangian must
be unified as well, since it came right out of his equation. Therefore I knew the Lagrangian’s two terms
must be misinterpreted. It was the potential energy term that was standing for Newton’s equation, and
the kinetic energy term wasn’t kinetic energy at all. It just had a form that mimicked the kinetic energy
equation. It was actually a correcting term, making the Lagrangian scalable in a unified field.
Meaning, this correcting term sort of pulled the EM field out of G in the other term, and expressed it a
second time as a function of motion, instead of as a function of mass. This correction allowed you to
get the right answer in any size field, instead of just in a human-sized field. Without knowing it,
Newton had scaled his equation to the field as we see it, at our size. So it works pretty well at this
scale. But with things very big or very small, his first equation doesn’t have enough information, so the
equation doesn’t know how close you are to the level of the photon—where everything is actually
happening. A unified field equation is actually a variable equation, since the solution varies depending
how large your object is. If you are an electron, just a little larger than a photon, you get a different
answer than if you are a star. But since the Lagrangian includes a motion in the field as well as a mass,
it knows how EM is affecting you as well as gravity. That’s why there is a v in that term. It isn’t
standing for a kinetic energy, it is standing for a resultant motion in the unified field, correcting and
extending the other term.
That was a bit difficult, I realize, but compared to mainstream physics, it is a walk in the park. You can
boil it down to this: the Lagrangian (and therefore the Hamiltonian, which you may have heard of) is
not a kinetic/potential energy equation. It is a gravity/EM unified field equation.
What other sexy things have I got for you? Well, I also famously solved the Bode Series. What is
that? It is the very old mystery of why the planets are spaced like they are. Why is the gap between
Jupiter and Saturn what it is, instead of some other value? And so on. A guy named Bode wrote down
all the gaps a long time ago and then tried to fit the series to a simple equation. The equation didn’t
really work: it was very rough, missing badly on most planets, but it came very close on Uranus, to less
than 1%, so the mainstream decided to enshrine it as genius and forbid anyone from ever working on it
again. No really. All the big journals have long had written rules in place forbidding any papers on
Bode, Relativity, and many other topics.
The thing is, that makes some sense, because without my charge field Bode and many other problems
were insoluble. These journals had been getting thousands of really stupid papers on Bode for decades
and they were understandably sick of it. Same with Relativity. Physicists can go round and round for
centuries and never get anything done, as we now know. But that wasn’t just true regarding Bode and
Relativity, it was true in all other subfields. The papers these journals were publishing were just as
stupid as the Bode and Relativity ones they weren’t, so we aren’t sure what the rules were based on.
Promotion of the usual suspects, I guess.
The tragedy in this was that when I came along with the right answers, the journals had already shut
down on these questions. They were aggressively contemptuous of anyone who claimed a solution, so
they treated me like dirt, assuming I was yet another crank. Yes, cranks definitely do exist, and by the
1990s they had ruined it for everyone. Or, I should say, they had done their part. Actually, I have
discovered since then that the cranks were only a small part of this problem. Mainstream physics had
ossified for far larger reasons, leading with the hubris of those at the top of the field and their control
by military intelligence, so I think my welcome would have been the same if cranks didn’t exist at all.
For instance, I am not aware that the mainstream journals had been inundated with Solar Cycle
solutions for decades, but the field nonetheless did everything they could to bury me. Of course by
then I was public enemy #1, based on two decades of embarrassing them on dozens of other big
questions, so there’s that. But my point is, they started this war, not me. If they had graciously and
fairly considered my theories from the beginning, I would have graciously avoided making so many
waves, eventually sloshing them all out of the pool.
Anyway, once I realized the Solar System wasn’t just gravity, I had a way to hit this that no one had
ever had before me. That’s because I didn’t just have a theory of unification, I actually had working
unified field equations. I had corrected Newton and now had a way to apply real equations to the
planets. It was my chance to do real multi-body solutions on real objects with very simple math. I
knew that if I could do that, I would prove my unified math really worked. And guess what, it DID
work! Using just highschool algebra I was able to match the known numbers in just a few pages of
math, out to five decimal points.
How did I do that? I did it because—unlike everyone before me—I wasn’t using gravitational
perturbations. I was letting the planets move one another via charge and EM. Same thing I later did
with the Solar Cycle predictions. So I was doing what no one had ever done before, and using math no
one had ever applied to the planets. Though it sounds revolutionary, and was, it wasn’t hard to do,
since these charge perturbations were straight functions of planetary masses and densities, as well as
distances. No second-order perturbations or remaining inequalities were necessary. Which means that
at the same time I also destroyed chaos theory. By solving in this simple way, I proved all the old
chaos was in bad equations, not in the real universe.
What else? I proved that Descartes’ explanation of the rainbow was completely wrong, by proving the
rainbow was just an image of the Solar Corona cast on a sheet of rain by rear projection. By studying
photos of the Sun and rainbow closely, I realized the width of the corona was exactly the same as
Alexander’s band—the width between the primary rainbow and the secondary one. Given that, there
was no way Descartes’ solution of light rattling around in a raindrop was correct. The light wasn’t
coming from the front and then being routed back by multiple reflections inside a raindrop. It was
coming from the back, by being reflected from distant bright spots in the clouds. It was then being
refracted in the sheet of moisture, explaining many things Descartes was never able to explain, starting
with the secondary bow. We no longer need the longwinded misdirection there, since the secondary
bow is just the outer edge of the corona. The charge field was necessary to this solution as well, since
it explained why the moisture in the atmosphere was acting like a prism: charge was moving up in the
atmosphere, as always, creating a pre-existing field that sorted wavelengths low to high. As a sidelight,
I was able to re-animate Goethe’s old theory of edges, showing how it worked in the charge field.
Another huge thing I have done is unify all the quantum particles, showing why they are the sizes they
are. Pauli famously complained about the quantum zoo, saying it seemed to have no rhyme, reason, or
end, but I proved he was wrong. I started by unifying the proton and electron, showing both were
fundamental levels in a simple quantum spin equation. We start with what I found in the superposition
paper: a particle has layers of spins, each spin double the radius of the one beneath it, and in a different
plane. So we just need a simple equation of doubling, to represent energy increases due to these radius
increases. That equation spits out the numbers 9, 65, 1025, and 16,385, representing the first through
fourth spins. If we take the first spin as the electron and the fourth as the proton, we can divide, getting
16,385/9=1,821. That just happens to be the known gap between the two fundamental particles. The
muon then hits the third level. Continuing from there, we can find the energies of all the known
mesons, as well as all the particles above the proton mass, including the so-called W, Z, and Higgs.
I will stop there, since I don’t want to tire you out, but I have solved literally hundreds of big problems
in physics, many of them just as earth-shattering as those. I have basically rewritten large parts of
physics since the time of Euclid and Archimedes, as well as physical chemistry, the textbook of which
now needs to be completely pulped. Not only have I diagrammed the nucleus, I have jettisoned all
electron orbital theory, proving that electrons don’t orbit the nucleus and don’t cause any of the bonds.
They are just along for the ride. The current orbital distances are distances of capture, but electrons
move on down to the nucleus and circle in the polar eddies of protons. All bonds are charge field
bonds, which makes far more sense than absurd electron bonds, caused we are told by atoms sharing
electrons. How did that lame theory ever get off the ground and survive for a century, you have to
wonder? Instead, we find real charge linkages between elements, as poles align and real photons move
in lines from one atom to the other. The entire universe is held together by the charge field, and
electrons are just buoys in the field—recycling the charge field in their own small ways, but being
minor players in almost all instances.
I am telling you all this because you need to know it, and you are unlikely to get it anywhere else. You
need to know it not only because you need to know that you are living in a very exciting time, when
physics is being totally rewritten from its foundations. Things are happening now that have never
happened before, and that have never gotten close to happening before, proving that there is something
new under the sun. But on a more personal level, you need to know it because as a reader of mine, you
need to know who I am. The levels of defamation against me have been huge and continue to grow,
but they are strictly upside-down to the truth. I wish someone else other than me could be doing this.
Just as it isn’t up to a man to bury himself (as Thoreau put it), it shouldn’t be up to a man to tell you
who he is, but that is where we find ourselves. Only the fakes are promoted, while all real people are
ignored or crushed. That is what it is to be in the belly of the whale, and we are all in the belly of the
whale, I assure you. But like Pinocchio, I have lit a fire in that belly, and we will see if Monstro can
keep me down.
