LA fires – Logical analysis – Fires were probably set by approved arsonists
Sun 9:04 am +00:00, 12 Jan 2025Source: https://mileswmathis.com/palisades.pdf
by Miles Mathis
January 10, 2025
First of all, I am in California but nowhere near Los Angeles, so everything here is just speculation. Of
course it would be speculation even if I were living in Palisades, like Henry Winkler or someone. I
don’t think anyone knows for sure what happened here, except those who are responsible for it. I
waited a few days to collect data and get a lay of the land, unlike some who seemed to arrive with their
conspiracy theories in the first hour—which is also suspicious, of course. Like the mainstream patter,
the alternative site/conspiracy site patter looks scripted, as you would expect. Both are trying to cover
the truth.
That’s right, my usual warning here applies: don’t trust either the mainstream account or the
alternative/conspiracy account. They are always planted to keep you off the scent.
I will take you in the same way I got in. I saw the first reports Tuesday evening, then followed it over
the next few hours. Before I went to sleep I checked overnight wind predictions from Weather
Underground, since the mainstream was saying wind would remain high overnight. That would be
extremely rare, since wind normally dies down at night. Weather is not completely predictable, of
course, but they are very accurate just a few hours out, and the professionals were confirming to me
winds would drop down to about 5mph overnight. That would last at least 14 hours, so I assumed
hotshot teams would fly in from all over the state and knock this thing down overnight. There are no
other fires in the state, since northern California has gotten a lot of rain in the past two months. Where
I am we have gotten a thorough soaking since November. So all the planes and helicopters across the
entire state should have been free to assist. Besides, this was Pacific Palisades, home of the rich, so
you would expect the response to be at maximum. No expense would be spared.
But of course we all know that isn’t what happened. When I woke up about noon, I checked both
Calfire and Wunderground first thing. Wunderground confirmed the winds overnight had been very
calm all across the LA area, and wouldn’t be as strong on Wednesday as they had been on Tuesday.
Tuesday peaked about 25mph, and Wednesday was supposed to peak at about 15mph. Brisk, but not
too strong to fight fires very successfully. But when I went to Calfire, I was in for a shock: zero
containment. Not only that, but the mainstream and alternative reports were both full of downright lies,
trying to push 100mph winds on me, high overnight winds, and no fall-off on Wednesday. So I knew
immediately the usual mischief was afoot, mischief that had to be something like we saw in Lahaina.
Not only that, but Calfire was now ablaze with many other fires, including one other large one and
about thirty smaller ones across LA that had popped up overnight while wind was down. Most of those
smaller ones were quickly tamped down, but this indicated to me that we had a team of arsonists
working LA, paid off by someone. Since the media was full of lies on winds and other things, I
quickly reached the conclusion that whoever was paying the arsonists was also paying the media to lie.
So this event must be scripted from the top, as usual. This was quickly confirmed by other stories, such
as fire hydrants in Palisades being dry, reports of too few firefighters, and teams being ordered out due
to conditions that were too dangerous. 5mph overnight winds were too dangerous for professional
teams? Really?
And conditions were too dangerous for professional hotshot teams, but not too
dangerous for Governor Newsom?
What about all we hear about not trying to outrun a fire, since they travel faster than a car? Despite
strong winds, that fire is barely moving, and Newsom is obviously in no fear of it. You will say he is
in the street, and so is safe because fires can’t burn pavement. Except that the fire in Palisades jumped
hundreds of wide streets like that with no problem, despite no towering pines in the area to help it.
Let’s pause on that thing about the dry hydrants. That is a huge clue here because there is no way that
was just an oversight. It is such extravagant incompetence it can’t be incompetence. One of the largest
cities in the world, known to be constantly in danger of burning, but they forgot to be sure the fire
hydrants had water? No way that is true. This was a planned fail, ordered from on high. We have seen
it a million times with events in the past, where they try to sell us the idea everything went wrong
simultaneously by accident. They left the lifejackets onshore, the lifeboats wouldn’t lower, the radio
went dead and all the backup batteries failed. The police cars wouldn’t start and the inflatable raft had
a hole. The security cameras all went dark simultaneously. The FBI had everyone under surveillance
but suddenly the computers went down and all contact was lost. All documentation was lost in a fire
and the tapes have been misplaced in the archives. The guy who knew that hit his head and lost all
memory.
So it doesn’t take much collation of data and genius to see that these fires were set on purpose and
ordered to let burn. Even more, if they burned as we are told, they must have been assisted on the
ground.
Which means all the chatter about incompetence, DEI, lady firefighters, lady mayors, chickens coming
home to roost and so on is just misdirection. It may be true as far as it goes, but it doesn’t explain what
happened here. With targeted fires set on purpose and a stand down order, you don’t need all these
other causes to explain it.
But why would anyone target Pacific Palisades? If some Nero is going to burn down LA on purpose to
gentrify it, due to Smart cities, the upcoming Olympics, or any other reason, you would think he would
target low-income areas, to drive those undesirables out. He wouldn’t target Pacific Palisades and
Malibu. And yet he did.
It makes perfect sense, though, if you think about it. A trillionaire isn’t going to want East LA, is he?
It would take way too much effort to clean it up and then you still have East LA. No, what you want if
you have infinite amounts of money is the most prime of prime real estate in the area, which is
Palisades and Malibu. That is why the rich are there to start with: mountains behind you and ocean in
front, with a constant cool breeze and low traffic. But buying out all those already-rich people there
would be inconvenient. It could be done, but it would cost way too much. Better to burn them out.
I have told you many times before of this war between the very rich and the super rich, and how it has
gotten much worse in the past 50 years. Why? Because the super rich have already stolen almost
everything they can from the middle class. We are tapped out. The only target they have left for
pillage is the very rich. So you have the billionaires and trillionaires now eating the hundred
millionaires. It was bound to happen.
We know it happens with companies, it is called monopolization. Over the long term, all money tends
to flow up and congregate in fewer hands. But it also happens with families and individuals, and it
happens with increasing speed as the middle class dies.
It will be interesting to see if some of these Hollywood millionaires figure out this is what just
happened, and if they have the guts to admit it. My guess is that even those who figure it out won’t say
anything, because they got where they are by sucking up to big money. If they hope to continue to be
taken care of as part of the families, they will have to keep their mouths shut and move on. They will
buy a slightly smaller huge house in some other slightly less rich neighborhood and live out their quiet
lives there.
4 more pages at the link above
