Christopher Columbus is not Who you Thought and neither is anything else
Thu 11:58 am +00:00, 15 Aug 2024by Miles Mathis
First published August 14, 2024
Our first clue here is that portrait of him at about age 40 by Alejo Fernandez. Not what you were
expecting, I bet. It was done in 1531, so not from life, but Fernandez consulted people who had known
him. Columbus had died just 25 years earlier. Two things jump out at us here, that being the nose and
the hair. We see a long Jewish nose with a “Roman” hump, but as a portrait painter I can tell you that
was probably toned down a bit by the artist, especially since we are looking at him profile. By the
1530s Columbus was already being sold as Gentile, for the usual reasons. They had already given him
a less obvious name, changing it from Colon to Columbus, and faked a birthplace for him in Genoa.
We will look more closely at that in a moment.
But let’s return to the nose.
The long Jewish nose and face are confirmed by that one, painted later from an earlier 16th c.
engraving. I don’t know why they didn’t just show us the engraving at Wikipedia, so I looked for it.
My assumption was the engraving looked even more Jewish, else why hide it. But it is unavailable on
the internet. As is the painting the engraving was made from. Engravings are not usually made on
their own. They are made as copies of oil or tempera paintings. So we are already at a third step here.
Which means this famous one by Sebastiano del Piombo that they always lead with is pure propaganda:
They admit it doesn’t match contemporary accounts of him and the words were added later, so it may
be a complete fake. If the words on the top were added later, then the signature was as well, since they
match. Which means we have no proof this is by Piombo. We also have no other indication it is
Columbus, and they admit it is only “said to be Columbus”. There is no record of Columbus sitting for
Piombo, and there should be since Piombo was very famous, being a friend of Michelangelo and
Keeper of the Papal Seal. That is what del Piombo means: “of the lead”, since the Papal seal was lead.
Furthermore, Piombo worked in Venice, not Spain or Portugal, and they admit many of his attributions
are disputed. But because he was so famous, he was a lightning rod for these fakes. Sort of like a
southern Rembrandt. Everyone wanted to discover or own a Piombo, so they just created many out of
thin air. This portrait of Columbus was faked for another reason: they need to convince the world
Columbus was a Gentile, and this fellow has a less Jewish face.
As a professional portrait painter, I think it is also possible that head was added later, being painted
over a different one. The head is way too small for the body, isn’t it? The hands are bigger than the
head.
Now, about that hair in the first one. They admit Columbus was graying by age 30, so that hair is
meant to be gray/blond. Columbus was known to have been a blue-eyed blond. Is that how you have
pictured it all these years? A blue-eyed blond with a long face and very big nose? I doubt it. When we
think of guys from Genoa (or Spain/Portugal), we don’t think of blue-eyed blonds. You will say that
proves he wasn’t Jewish, but not so fast. Yes, it indicates he wasn’t lower-class Jewish, because those
people don’t have the wherewithal to marry tall beautiful blonde women. But Jewish nobles have been
marrying tall blondes and redheads for centuries, for obvious reasons: because they could. Many
Spanish/Portuguese lines are famous for it, including the current Royal line in Spain.
That’s Princess Leonor from a few years ago, showing off her Swedish blood. Her hair is now
darkening and she is getting pudgy, so she may have peaked at 14, but who knows? My point being
that these royal European lines are the most likely to have these submerged genes for blue-blond,
indicating Columbus was most likely from them.
But even without all that, you should have known Columbus was Jewish. All the navigators were
Jewish, since this is the Phoenician Navy we are talking about: they have owned worldwide shipping
for at least 6,000 years. They try to sell Columbus as from a poor nothing family, but that is just the
usual sob story these people always tell. They are inveterate liars and this is one of their favorite lies.
With find another clue—perhaps the biggest—with his wife, the Portuguese noblewoman Filipa Moniz
Perestrelo. He married her in 1479, when he was 28 and before he was famous. So how did he manage
that, exactly? From Wiki:
Discussing the question of how Christopher Columbus, the son of a Genoese wool weaver, could
marry the daughter of a Portuguese Knight of Santiago, a member of the household of
Prince John, Lord of Reguengos de Monsaraz (Master of Santiago,) and of Prince Henry the
Navigator’s household, Samuel Eliot Morison[4] wrote that this is “no great mystery.” Filipa was
“already about 25 years old,” her mother was a widow “with slender means,” and “her mother was
glad enough to have no more convent bills to pay, and a son-in-law […] who asked for no dowry.
And they wonder why we don’t trust historians? That is the worst sort of pettifogging. And gee, who
was Samuel Morison? Only a rear admiral in the US Navy, so . . . Phoenician Navy himself. He was a
close relative of T. S. Eliot. Morison came out of the Phoenix SK Club at Harvard. Man, is this easy
or what?
But it was worse than pettifogging, since all that stuff about her mother being of slender means with
convent bills is just bold-face lying. Filipa Perestrelo had her own comendary, which means she owned
feudal lands that paid her rent. Filipa wasn’t a nun paying bills, she owned the convent. Do you think
Morison wasn’t aware of that? They admit it in previous sentences at Wikipedia, but then try to bluff
you with this poverty stuff a few paragraphs later, figuring you don’t know what a comendary is and
won’t even click on the provided link to find out.
So this is just more indication Columbus wasn’t the son of a Genoese wool weaver. But there is a clue
even in the lie, since weaving points right at the Jews as well. It indicates Columbus’ family may have
been involved in textiles, but as owners of big companies and vast lands, not as weavers.
But it gets better. Filipa’s father wasn’t just a Knight of Santiago, he was also. . . Phoenician Navy. All
you have to do is click his link at Wiki, where they admit he was a shipowner, navigator and explorer
himself, having discovered Porto Santo Island. He became its Lord and Governor. Filipa’s grandfather
was Micer Filippo Pallastrelli, a Lombard knight and nobleman of King John I of Portugal. Several
more clues there, since the Lombard knights were crypto-Jews, and the same can be said of John, who
was an Aviz. They come from Henry II of England as well as from the Dukes of Burgundy, making
them Capetians as well as Plantagenets, Dunkelds, and Komnenes. They also come from Rollo the
Viking, making them Phoenicians and Komnenes once again. Through Alfonso of Castile they take us
directly back to Isaac II Angelos, Byzantine Emperor of the House of . . . Komnene.
Filipa’s grandmother was Caterina Visconti, of that Italian noble house. Filipa’s great-grandfather
Pallastrelli was a nobleman of the House of the Infante Joao, son of King John I. So they are admitting
that Columbus was not just marrying the daughter of a knight, he was marrying into the royal house.
And to do that, Columbus must have been of royalty or other very high nobility himself. Otherwise the
marriage would have been forbidden. It indicates Columbus was Portuguese himself, not Italian. It
doesn’t take much digging to find some historians admitting that, though the mainstream dismisses
them, telling us “this theory has been dismissed by most scholars”. You mean the mainstream scholars
who will be paid off to say anything? But the evidence Columbus was Jewish/Portuguese stacks to the
Moon, while the evidence he wasn’t all looks manufactured and false. Such as? Well, the biggest clue
here is that when he returned from his first famous voyage, he didn’t first report to his alleged sponsors,
the King and Queen of Spain. No, he reported first to the King of Portugal. Also curious is that
Columbus spoke and wrote Hebrew, and celebrated the Jewish holidays on his voyages. He used the
Jewish calendar. Why would a Gentile from Genoa do that?
If you still don’t believe me, you may want to read this page at MyJewishLearning.com. They admit
his birthname, Cristobal Colon, was Jewish, and that his mother was a Fonterossa, also Jewish. His
grandfather in that line was Jacob and his great-grandfather was Abraham. They then give you this
quote:
I am not the frst admiral of my family, let them give me whatever name they please; for when
all is done, David, that most prudent king, was frst a shepherd and afterward chosen King of
Jerusalem, and I am a servant of that same Lord who raised him to such a dignity.
They admit Columbus was surrounded by prominent Jews, including the astronomers/navigators in the
Spanish court Josef Vicenho and Martin Behaim. Also Abraham Zacuto of the University of
Salamanca, who assisted Columbus. Even more important was Luis de Santangel (originally Chinillo),
the driving force behind the entire enterprise. As controller-general and chancellor of Aragon,
Santangel provided the funding for the trip, a large part of it from his personal fortune.
That’s Santangel, and no it isn’t shortened. He was way under 5 feet tall.
Wiki admits:
After his expeditions, Columbus was granted the island of Jamaica, which became a place of refuge
for many Sephardi Jews after their expulsion from Spain and Portugal.
Santangel’s heir Antonio de la Cadena Maluenda became the treasurer of New Spain in 1525,
continuing the Jewish financial dominance of the New World.
Other Jewish sponsors of Columbus’ voyage were Gabriel Sanchez, Aragon’s treasurer, and Don Isaac
Abarbanel, treasurer of Portugal. At Wiki they pretend not to know where the name Abarbanel came
from, but it is obviously a variant of Bourbon. Remember, the Jews aren’t too particular about their
vowels, it is all about the consonants. Drop vowels and it is the same name, isn’t it, with a bonus at the
end: El, the high god of the Phoenicians.
Columbus just happened to leave on August 2, the date of the Jewish expulsion. Many (most? all?) of
those on Columbus’ ships were Jewish, including his bursar and his surgeon. We are told his trip was
funded in part by expelling all the Jews from Spain and stealing their property, but you can be sure that
isn’t true. As we are seeing, all the most prominent people of Spain were Jewish, including the royals,
so they could hardly expel all the Jews.
You will say, “Are you telling me the Inquisition wasn’t pointed at the Jews of Spain?” That’s what I
am telling you. Some Jews who weren’t following the party line may have been swept up, but in
general we know going in this couldn’t have been aimed at Jews since the country was run by them.
Same as now, same as it ever was. From the early years the Inquisition wasn’t mainly about
Jewishness, it was about Christian heresy, and it was run by the Dominicans, an especially nasty group
of cloaked government agents. Remember, the Dominicans were founded by a Spanish guy name
Dominic de Guzman, and as with many Popes, we have no idea where this guy came from. No
genealogy. But as usual it is very obvious, since Guzman is a Jewish name. They were nobles from
the beginning, later being Dukes of Medina, the first being Alonso Perez de Guzman, who they pretend
was a Muslim from Morocco. You have to laugh. A later Duchess of Medina admitted the historians
had cleaned up their history, making it more palatable to Christians, but even her admission is spun.
She wasn’t admitting to be a Muslim, she was admitting to be a Jew. These Guzman later ruled Toledo,
a famous Jewish/Phoenician stronghold.
The wealthiest man in Spain at the time of Columbus was a Guzman, the 2nd Duke.
In the 1500s a Guzman was Commander-in-Chief of the entire Spanish Armada, and by that time they
had married into many other top Jewish lines, including Sotomayor, Zuniga, Mendoza, Ponce de Leon,
Braganza, and Aragon. That last means they had married into the royal family, something no Muslim
could do.
Wikipedia, after misdirecting for many sentences on the genealogy of St. Dominic the Guzman, finally
admits that Pero Tafur conceded he was from this famous de Guzman family of billionaires. Tafur
should have known, since he was a de Guzman himself. So you should find it very curious that the
Dominicans were founded by billionaire Jews. Or not so curious, since that is what we have always
found.
The Dominicans were founded “to spread the gospel and to oppose heresy.” Strangely non-Christian,
isn’t it? What about turning the other cheek? The Dominicans’ role in the Inquisition, and their
founding by billionaire Jews, tells us that it was never about battling heresy, it was always about using
the church for pillage. If someone has something you want, just charge them with heresy, throw them
in jail, and take it. Wealth accumulation 101. We can be sure this happened in the 1400s to fund
Columbus, but again, it wasn’t aimed at Jews. We can be sure the Jews were the most spared, if
anything. It was aimed at anyone making money but not bowing deeply enough to the governors and
treasurers. Anyone not prostrate before the mobsters was targeted.
Sort of ruins your piety, doesn’t it? Once you know the truth, all the beauty of that evaporates like
spilled grape kool-aid on a burning hot sidewalk.
But back to Columbus. To see the current state of the lie, you may consult Wikipedia, as usual. They
have a page on “Origin Theories of Columbus”, which is slanted to vertical in favor of the Genoese
story, but which is otherwise all spin. I encourage you to read it closely, since it has zero real evidence
in favor of that theory. Most of the “evidence” is a list of previous historians or other people who said
he was, as if that is evidence. In a court all of that would be dismissed as hearsay. They are just
repeating what someone told them, which isn’t evidence.
Wiki leads the page with only two documents, neither of which will convince anyone. The first is a
probably forged note allegedly in Columbus’ hand, in a deed of primogeniture which first was produced
by his heirs in 1578 in court during a squabble over money. The second is a note to his bank that says,
Bien que el coerpo ande aca el coracon esta ali de continuo. Though my body is here, my heart is
constantly there.
So they are leading with that? That is an example of their best evidence? Genoa isn’t even mentioned
by name, so “here” or “there” could be anywhere. And just because your heart is there doesn’t mean
you were born there. I might say my heart is in Bruges, but I wasn’t born there.
The next section of proof is his son Ferdinand’s book. But they admit everyone knew Ferdinand was a
big liar, not to be trusted on any issue, so again it is hard to understand why they include this section. It
undercuts their own argument, but it is all they have.
If Columbus really was from Genoa, it shouldn’t be hard to find documentary proof of that, especially
considering his prominence. We have seen he had to have been aristocracy to marry Filipa, and any
aristocracy in Genoa would have extensive documentation. It is simply beyond belief that we would
have to rely on a short note to a bank, late in his life. This page at Wikipedia is so weak it
unintentionally acts as proof Columbus was NOT from Genoa.
Amusingly, that page does give us more proof of the Jewish theory, since it admits Columbus used the
bet-hei letters (b’ezrat hashem) on all but one of the letters to his son, as well as an anagram for the
Kaddish. They also admit that Simon Wiesenthal and Robert Graves both believed Columbus was
Jewish. You will say that is more hearsay, but it isn’t since Wiesenthal and Graves both did a lot of
research, they didn’t just parrot the party line. Repeating the party line is easy and requires no research
or courage, but bucking the party, especially if you are Jewish, is very difficult. I am no fan of
Wiesenthal, as you may know, but you have to ask why he would blow the mainstream cover here. It
would be like blowing the Ann Frank story, so it doesn’t fit his profile or assignment.
Another thing is almost lost on that page, since they point out something else: when Columbus wasn’t
writing in Hebrew, he was writing in Spanish. At first that didn’t sink in, because they didn’t put it in
the way it begs to be put: he never wrote in Italian. Why would an Italian never write in Italian? He
didn’t speak Italian, either.
As for Columbus being Portuguese, Wiki admits:
Proponents of the Portuguese hypothesis also point to a court document which stated that Columbus’s
nationality was “Portuguese”[nb 29] and in another, Columbus uses the words “my homeland” in relation to
Portugal. [94][95]
Strangely, Wiki footnotes the second document but otherwise has nothing to say about its authenticity.
The court document is not even footnoted, since nb 29 doesn’t mean anything. It has nothing to do with
the 29th footnote. So why should we dismiss these documents while accepting the sad Genoese
documentation? No answer to that. Crickets. Then Wiki tells us about the DNA study, saying it began
in 2021. Another lie, since as you are about to see it began 20 years ago.
Six and half years ago, Forbes published an article admitting Columbus’ early life looks made up, and
suggesting he was Portuguese rather than Genoese. That is true, but unfortunately this looks like more
misdirection, since they are selling Branco’s theory that Columbus is really a guy named Pedro Ataide,
who changed his name to avoid persecution. This is an obvious attempt to muddy the waters and
surround the right answer with noise. They were doing DNA tests on bones at that time to prove that
theory, but almost seven years later we are given no update. Indicating to me it was all another bluff.
Why? To get your name off the name Colon, which is Jewish. Also to get your name off his mother
Fonterossa. If Columbus was really Ataide, he would have a different mother, so they could bury that
clue.
The Irish Times finally published an update on the DNA tests in January of 2023, admitting it had taken
two decades already and promising results by the end of the year. But here it is more than a year and a
half later, and no results. My guess is they confirmed the Jewish hypothesis and have been working on
some big lie to spin that. The usual. All these scientists and writers pretend the big question is what
city or state he was from, but that is almost beside the point. What matters is not the place, but the
bloodlines. I have already shown you he is from royal Jewish lines, so I have no interest in this DNA
question. So far they have only used DNA to muddy all these questions, so I won’t trust anything they
tell us at this point. For one example, Henry Gates at Faces of America on PBS did Meryl Streep’s
DNA and told her she wasn’t Jewish at all. She looked at him like he was crazy. She believed she was
Jewish before the test and still does. Everyone with eyes knows she is Jewish, but this is what they do.
They stand in front of the Sun and tell you it is night, then get mad when you don’t believe them.
But why lie about Streep or Columbus? Because they need you to believe that someone besides highly
promoted Jews has been famous in the history of the world. You might get just a little suspicious if
you found out every famous person in history was Jewish/Phoenician.
If we return to MyJewishLearning, we find this:
In New Spain, as many as 2,000 conversos settled in Mexico City, Guadalajara, Vera Cruz, Puebla, and
Guatemala City. In New Castile, approximately the same number of New Christians resided in Lima, Poto
Tucuman, and Cordoba. By the 1630s, hardly a town in the Spanish Empire did not shelter at least a scattering
of conversos, some of whom migrated as far as New Mexico and Florida.
Their vocations were no less diverse than in Europe. Among the conversos there were numerous artisans —
shoemakers, spice-makers, tailors. Others were ranchers. Several New Christians were priests. One was a
bishop. There were converso military officers. The mayor of Tecali was New Christian. Yet, as in Europe, most
Sephardim gravitated toward commerce. Several became managers of silver mines. Others were gem and food
dealers. They played their traditionally decisive role in the import-export market, including the slave trade.
Altogether, New Christians were as prominent in the Americas as in Spain, Portugal or the Netherlands.
“New Christians” and “Conversos” are JEWS. Notice they also admit these crypto-Jews were Catholic
priests and bishops. Why would they want to become Catholic priests? We know they had only
pretended to convert to avoid persecution. So why pretend to be priests? To infiltrate the Church and
blow it from the inside, of course. Also to use the Church to create schism, and perhaps most
importantly (as we saw with St. Dominic) to use the Church to steal wealth.
But let’s back up and look even more closely at Columbus’ wife Filipa. There is so much more we
missed the first time. Filipa was Jewish in her mother’s line as well, since Moniz is Jewish, too. See
Ernest Moniz, Portuguese, the fake nuclear physicist who was Obama’s Secretary of Energy.
That photo makes me laugh, because it proves again that a picture is worth a thousand words. Imagine
him in period garb instead of that suit: he looks like he tunneled in from the 16th century, doesn’t he,
even having the right Phoenician haircut. I say he is a fake physicist, since, despite being a bigwig in
the field, he knows far less about the nucleus than I do. What real physics did he ever do? His Wiki
page conspicuously forgets to tell us that. As you would expect of a Jewish scientist, he has always
been much more interested in making money than in studying the nucleus. Another clue is the Cyprus
Institute, yes, named after the Phoenician island, that he founded in 2005. This is strange because the
Cyprus Institute has nothing to do with Nuclear Physics. If you read their long Wiki page, you won’t
be any wiser about what they actually do or why they were founded, other than to further buy out and
dominate all research and education by the banks. In 2017 he became CEO of the Nuclear Threat
Initiative, which proves my point again. This guy isn’t interested in unlocking the actual physics of the
nucleus, he is interested in using fake physics to create fear and through that funding.
NTI’s self-described mission is “to transform global security by driving systemic solutions to
nuclear and biological threats imperiling humanity.”[1]
How? By spending more and more taxdollars every year on global security, of course.
Also see Portuguese quack and Nobel Prize winner Antonio Moniz, who invented the lobotomy. There
has long been a movement to have his prize revoked, but the Nobel Committee won’t hear of it. They
love murder and mayhem, being founded on it. Moniz was also a Resende Abreu, proving once again
he was Jewish from these same Komnene lines. Both Moniz and Resende come from the first king of
Portugal, Afonso I, who was both Burgundian and Asturian. According to the family itself, the
Asturians came from the Visigothic rulers of Toledo, always a Jewish stronghold. They have been sold
to you as barbarians, but they weren’t. The Goths were Phoenician cousins from the north during the
Roman Empire, meaning, they were the Vikings again. The purple people by another name.
Most importantly, see Vasco Gil Moniz, who in the time of Columbus was a Vedor (viceroy) of the son
of John I of Portugal. Vasco was married to Leonor, daughter of Phoebus of Lusignan. Phoebus just
happened to be the Marshal of Armenia and Lord of Sidon, both of which you will remember as
Phoenician states. Sidon had been a chief port of Phoenicia for millennia, back to the time of Solomon
and before. So again, the clues are leaping up and biting us in the ass. This tells us how important
Vasco Moniz was, since his wife’s sister Charlotte was Queen of Cyprus, and while Moniz was
marrying Leonor, Charlotte was marrying the Infante John of Portugal, son of the King of Portugal.
That of course made him the brother-in-law of the King, once John took the throne. Proving again that
Columbus’ wife was that close to the throne.
The next thing to do was to figure out the relationship of this Vasco Gil Moniz to Columbus’ motherin-law Isabel Moniz. Isn’t hard to do, since Geni tells us Vasco is her father. They list him as Vasco
Martins Moniz, but it is the same guy since they admit he was the Vedor to the Infante. I have saved
that page in case they memoryhole it after this paper comes out. Which means. . . Columbus’ wife’s
grandfather was brother-in-law to the King, they being married to sisters. Which means Columbus
was also an in-law of the King of Portugal.
That was amazingly well scrubbed at Wikipedia, though you would think it would be the first thing
they would tell you. I had to trip over it at Geni.
Another clue to all this is Columbus’ ships:
They have changed the names of them. They weren’t the Nina, the Pinta, and the Santa Maria, as you
are taught. The Santa Maria was really named the Gallega, which means the Galician. From Galicia.
That’s the part of Spain in the NW corner right above Portugal. Not coincidentally, Galicia had the
strongest Phoenician history in Spain. The Galician language is more Portuguese than Spanish, and
also has some Celtic roots, linking it to Ireland. Which is why we saw the Viking links many times
above. While more Southern ports in Spain were Southern Phoenician ports, the ports of Galicia were
mixed, being also Northern Phoenician or Viking ports, linking them more closely to the Komnenes.
Which means the sails on those replica ships are also misdirection. We don’t know what the sails of
Columbus looked like, but since those sails are cross fleury, indicating the Bourbons, we know they
can’t be right. In naming his ship the Gallega, Columbus was expressly linking it to the north, so we
would expect the sails to indicate that somehow. We would be more likely to see the lions of the house
of Plantagenet, which were really the lions of Judah, which were really the lions of El:
Taking us back to 4000BC. See here, where they pretend they don’t know where the lions and eagles
of all the royal houses of Europe come from. But I have proved the eagle is a phoenix. Herodotus
admitted the phoenix looked just like an eagle. And the knife handle above shows you where the lions
come from. They have to come from somewhere with access to lions, right, and lions never existed in
Europe. Pointing us at Egypt, of course. Egypt birthed Phoenicia and the Phoenicians conquered the
world, bringing their phoenices and lions with them on their banners and shields.
Next we look at Columbus’ strange signature, which we are told is an unsolved mystery. Except that
Cecil Roth, a Jew, solved it easily. This British historian pointed out that the anagram was very similar
to pyramidal letters with dots that appeared on Jewish gravestones in Spain, being a cryptic substitute
for Kaddish, the prayer recited by Jewish mourners. It allowed and encouraged his sons to say their
prayers covertly. The Jews love being covert, as you know.
Strangely, that article at CNN mentions Wiesenthal, but spells his name wrong. And here we discover
what Wiesenthal was up to in admitting Columbus was Jewish. It is all about the spin. Wiesenthal
tells you that truth but then assures you Columbus was going to the New World to find a home for the
Jews being expelled from Spain by its rulers. Except that we know he wasn’t. He was going to find
new lands for the Phoenicians to subjugate and pillage, as was proved by the outcome. It was about
conquest, rapine, gold and other minerals, and mainly. . . money. His Jewish backers expected a return
on their investments. So Wiesenthal’s assignment really was a cohort of his work on the Holocaust,
salting in the old “Jews as victims” mantra that goes back to Babylon. But these Jews leaving on
August 2, 1492, weren’t leaving because they were expelled, they were leaving as conquistadors large
and small, hoping to profit hugely in new lands, as the Phoenicians always had. It would be like
claiming the Phoenicians were being expelled from Tyre every time one of their ships left port.
Which means the expulsion of the Jews coincides with Columbus’ voyage not because Columbus was
ferrying them to freedom, but because the expulsion of the Jews was made up later and attached to
Columbus’ voyage on purpose. The earlier massacre of 1391 was also faked. This deserves a paper of
its own, but I can only gloss it here. If you don’t believe me, I encourage you to read the Wikipedia
page on that and get back to me. OK, you are back. Did that make any sense at all, or did it seem to be
dreamed up by some kids on acid? Whoever wrote that garbage not only doesn’t know how to write, he
doesn’t know how to quit contradicting himself every other sentence. The rulers of Spain are
constantly guarding the Jews and warning no one to abuse them, since they are such good taxpayers—
which makes sense—but no one listens to them. The bishops just keep ignoring the Kings and Queens
and murdering thousands of innocent people, with no repercussions. Is that the way the Kings of Spain
ever acted in any other stories that don’t concern Jews? Did they ever pass laws and then just sit
around placidly as prominent people broke them? No, of course not. Even the Wiki police admit the
page is a mess:
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk
page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia’s quality standards. The specific problem is: tone,
style, essay-like tones. (December 2018)
This article needs additional citations for verification. (December 2018)
That was six years ago. Has the page improved since then? Nope, it is still a complete disaster, and the
specific problem isn’t tone or style. It is that the whole thing reads as a piecemeal fantasy, written by a
moron. Do you know why this page is a disaster? Because the story has always been a complete
disaster, and no additional citations are available since this never happened. But, unlike the Holocaust,
no one cares because it is so long ago. So they don’t even bother to hire a top liar to come in and clean
this mess up, to make it look somewhat believable. They figure no one is going to read this, and if they
do they will just accept it and move on, not asking any questions. And that appears to be the case.
Before claiming Queen Isabel allowed or ordered this expulsion, all the mainstream histories admit she
had previously been a great protector of the Jews, confessing herself in print many times that she was
their protector. Of course she was, since she was Jewish/Phoenician:
Note the extremely long face and nose and the heavy-lidded eyes. The artist has corrected her nose a
bit in the first one, trying to tone it down, but in the second one we see a bit more of the truth, with the
turned-down, droopy septum John Lennon nose. Those of you just getting here may think that is a
strange comparison, but it isn’t. Remember, Lennon titled one of his books A Spaniard in the Works.
All these people really are related. Plus, we just saw the Portuguese royal house of that time descending
in direct line from the Plantagenets of England. Wikipedia gives you all the lines in black in white. So
I am not making up any of this to suit myself.
So why did she change her mind, allowing their burning at the stake and expulsion? No good answer
to that is ever forthcoming, and she never explained it herself, or even mentioned it. The only answer
we get is the sort of convoluted jawing we find at Wikipedia, where the writer seems to make up
reasons from nothing, while contradicting himself every other sentence.
If you keep studying these pages, you find your belief in all this history completely evaporating. For
one thing, you find Tomas de Torquemada, the most feared Inquisitor and of course a Dominican, was
a Jew himself. We saw that coming, didn’t we?
Have you seen that? I bet you haven’t. They hide it at Wikipedia, for obvious reasons. I hadn’t ever
seen it until just now. COULD IT BE MORE EFFING OBVIOUS! Are you screaming at the
computer screen right now. I am.
Anyway, Tomas’ uncle was Juan de Torquemada, who they admit was a big defender of the Jews. Of
course he was:
Because he was a Jew. The Jewish Hernando de Pulgar, who was the royal historian and personal
chronicler of Queen Isabella, admitted the Torquemadas were Jewish. Of course the mainstream
“historians” now dismiss that as unfounded, though they don’t deny he said it in print, because it
destroys the entire fake history of that time. Tomas Torquemada was the Grand Inquisitor during the
Expulsion, proving it was staged or completely faked on paper. It is nothing but another Jewish
fabrication, told to create sympathy and to flip the entire reality of the time.
Which reminds us: as they did with Martin Luther, the Pythons also warned us of this:
Notice what color gloves the two other Inquisitors are wearing: purple. Terry Jones’ Inquisitor has a big
red mustache. The whole thing is a farce, as was the history we are sold.
But I draw your attention to something else: the Pythons have the inquisitors in red, I guess to indicate
they are cardinals. But Torquemada is wearing black above. He was a friar and prior, but not a
cardinal.
You probably think Torquemada burned or jailed hundreds of thousands of Jews. Nope. Pulgar tells
us there were only 2,000 executions in the 30-year reign of Isabella, so about 65 a year. Torquemada
died in 1498, six years before Isabella, and wasn’t Grand Inquisitor until 1483, so he presided over less
than 1000 over 15 years. Given that there were about 500,000 Jews in Spain before the Expulsion, and
that the executions of those years weren’t just Jews, the Inquisition of bad boy Torquemada affected
less than .1% of all Jews. Maybe 20 or 30 a year. And that is assuming it happened, which it didn’t.
20 or 30 deaths a year in a country of six million is negligible, especially considering the fact that this
was the time of the Black Death, when millions were dying across Europe. The Jewish historians didn’t
pick this century for their fake Jewish pogrom for no reason, since many Jews were dying of disease
and some of them could be swept over into the murdered-by-evil-anti-Semites category.
As far as the Expulsion story goes, we already know the same lie was told about those coming to the
New World from England a century later, since they too were sold as poor Puritans fleeing religious
bigotry. But they weren’t. They were Phoenicians, most of them connected to the English or Dutch
East or West India companies, seeking further riches and conquest.
Which leaves us with just one more big thing to hit. The name Colon. Have you figured it out yet? If
not, ask yourself why the mainstream sites like Wiki give you his name in Latin, English, Italian,
Spanish, and Genoese, but not in Portuguese. In that case he would be Cristovao Pomba, since Colon
means dove and the Portuguese for dove is Pomba. That doesn’t take us anywhere on the Jewish
question, and indicates Colon isn’t right, either. So let’s use Occam’s Razor and ask what the simplest
solution here would be. That would be a change of one letter, right? I suggest . . . Christopher Cohon.
That explains everything, because as a Cohen/Comnene he could marry anyone, no matter how noble
or royal they were. Being from the top priestly class of the Phoenicians, he would secretly outrank
everyone, even kings and queens.
Yep, as in physics, the right answer is always deceptively simple. In a previous paper I showed you
that Genghis Khan was actually. . . George Kohen. Same thing here, where we find Christopher
Columbus the fake Genoan was actually Chris Cohen. History finally starts to make sense. The grand
illusion has been pierced.
Source: https://mileswmathis.com/colon.pdf
