NHS Told to Differentiate Between Patients in Hospital “For Covid” and Those in Hospital “With Covid” – and Not Before Time

After almost 15 months of various forms of lockdown, hospitals have finally been told to change the way they collect data on patients who test positive for Covid. They have been instructed to differentiate between those who are actually sick with Covid symptoms and those who test positive but are actually ill with something else. The Independent has the story.

NHS England has instructed hospitals to make the change to the daily flow of data sent by NHS trusts and told the Independent that the move was being done to help analyse the effect of the vaccine programme and whether it was successfully reducing Covid sickness…

One NHS source said the new data would be “more realistic” as not all patients were sick with the virus, adding: “But it will make figures look better as there have always been some, for example stroke [patients], who also had Covid as an incidental finding.”

In a letter to hospital bosses on June 7th, shared with the Independent, NHS England’s Covid Incident Director, Professor Keith Willett, said that from now on NHS England wanted “a breakdown of the current stock of Covid patients into those who are in hospital with acute Covid symptoms (and for whom Covid is the primary reason for being in hospital); and those who are primarily in hospital for a reason other than Covid (but for whom the hospital is having to manage and treat the Covid symptoms alongside their primary condition)”.

He added: “In lay terms, this could be considered as a binary split between those in hospital ‘for Covid’ and those in hospital ‘with Covid’. We are asking for this binary split for those patients newly admitted to hospital and those newly diagnosed with Covid while in hospital.”…

NHS England data on hospital admissions is published daily at a regional level and several days later on the Government’s dashboard. An internal daily dashboard of Covid data tracks infections across hospitals but is not made public.

Professor Ian Douglas from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine said: “I think there are good arguments for presenting these data separately – people in hospital ‘with’ vs ‘for’ Covid, as it does partly address the burden to health services due to the virus. Not completely though, because people in hospital with Covid will presumably also need to be treated differently to avoid further spread, which places some extra burden on the hospitals.

“I’ve got no idea what the split is like at the moment, and importantly we won’t know retrospectively what the trend is. Following on from that, there are only a few days before any announcement about June 21st, which may not give us long enough to be sure about what direction the ‘for Covid’ numbers are going.”

This change resembles the recent shift in the definition of a “case” by the CDC in America, where an infection in a vaccinated person is now only a “case” when the person is hospitalised or dies, whereas with the unvaccinated any positive PCR test still counts as a “case”, no matter how mild or asymptomatic.

Now, I’m all in favour of a more restrictive and conventional definition of case that gives a more realistic picture of the impact of the disease. But one can’t help suspect it’s more about politics than science when the kind of change many of us have been calling for since the start only comes once it helps to create the impression that the vaccines are working.

The Independent report is worth reading in full.



2 Responses to “NHS Told to Differentiate Between Patients in Hospital “For Covid” and Those in Hospital “With Covid” – and Not Before Time”

  1. pete fairhurst says:

    Well if they had done this at the very start then, all this covid nonsense would have been over straight away. People would have realised that the threat to them is not much different to a normal flu season. So there was absolutely no chance of that happening and it is almost too late now, the evil narrative is established…..

    I think that the “cases” BS is the beating heart of the scam. A “case” is identified by the, entirely inappropriate, PCR “test” which the inventor, Mullis, stated is NOT a diagnostic test. He conveniently “died” just before all this kicked off, what a surprise…

    What sort of “pandemic” is it when most people who contract the lurgy are “asymptomatic” and recover fully? At least 99.8% of them recover, that is now well established. The virus is primarily a mind virus and a “case” is just BS plain and simple. Interesting that the article in Lockdown Sceptics doesn’t day all that, tells me a bit about them….

  2. ihunt says:

    Car Crash After Getting The Jab ( Boston.)

    To Save Your Health- Wreck It..

    Dr Charles Hoffe -DANGERS OF CHILD COVID Gene Mod JAB Part 1
    Dr Charles Hoffe -DANGERS OF CHILD COVID Gene Mod JAB Part 2

    Liberal Gets It At Last.. NO to VAXX

    Share This -Its about CHILDREN NOW……

    Another BBCer DEAD -The Devil Eats his Own.
    Dr. Mikovits: Covid “vaccine” spike protein injections could kill 50 million Americans.

    Suffering from VAX-CLOT? New blood-clotting disorder is sweeping the globe.

    ‘We made a big mistake’ — COVID vaccine spike protein travels from injection site, can cause organ damage.

    Social Distancing Stops The Vaccine From Spreading!

    No Jab No Phone!! Threat!

    Vaksinnated banned from air travel in Russia and Spain due to blood clots
    Thu 4:37 pm +00:00, 10 Jun 2021 2
    posted by Tapestry
    Just been sent this, thought it was quite interesting, as it ties in with banning the plebs from air travel.
    Blood Clots and Travel: What You Should Know
    We are starting to come full circle. Now airlines in Spain and Russia are warning people who have been vaccinated should not travel. Indeed, COVID-19 vaccinated people can be excluded from air travel! That was the headline of a Russian online news portal. There are a number of news articles coming out a warning that vaccinated people may not be allowed to travel because of the danger of blood clots in the mile-high atmosphere. In Spain, the same thing is appearing. This has raised concerns that are the objective of this vaccine to prevent travel?
    Kind regards,

    ⁣Dr Tess Lawrie demands Dr June Raine the Chief Exec of MHRA halts the Covid Vaccine programme immediately due to severe Adverse Reactions and Deaths.


    More on the J&J shot vibrating brain.