Beyond Reason – Sir Kwier Stalin and the rent boys

 Sun 9:37 am +00:00, 21 Jun 2026  

posted by pete fairhurst 2

 

Source: https://roguemale.org/2026/06/21/beyond-reason/

What was the reason behind the arson attacks on Starmer’s properties? Don’t concern yourself with that question, argues the Prosecutor.

It appears to many an interested observer that we are in a time that is lacking reason. This point is easily illustrated by the daily round of crazy narratives that are pumped out by the state’s propaganda machinery.

For the purposes of this essay and the accompanying Roguecast, I am going to illustrate the point by a brief examination of but two of the various intrigues and incongruous events that Sir Kier Starmer is attached to, if not embroiled in.

The increasingly rotund Prime Minister is a very strange character, or LARPer and it appears that he is currently acting our the final scenes in his role as Prime Minister of the “United Kingdom” (the state-corporate entity, that is).

The first current issue to which he is directly and unreasonably (i.e ‘without reason’) attached is the recently completed trial of 3 young Ukrainian men, which resulted in two of them being found guilty o fire-bombing three of Starmer’s former properties in April 2025.

When I state ‘reason’, I simply mean the ability to think logically, to apply what some may call good sense and rational thought. Critical thinking by another term.

The recent judicial pantomime/cover-up deliberately avoided an explanation of the facts of the arson attacks and this had the effect of a typical state whitewashing of the awkward subject matter and its connection to Sir Kweir Stalin (sic).

The three men who were arrested on suspicion were reportedly ‘male models’ or likely ‘rent boys’ with profiles on a homosexual hook-up site known as Grindr. How sweet.

They were arrested and placed on remand at Belmarsh prison where they were detained for a year. In and of itself, that is unusual for typically their trial would have been a lot sooner, even in these strange days of delayed justice and judicial maladministration.

The Old Bailey trial, such as it was marked by a most unusual aspect in that Prosecutor Duncan Atkinson KC (King’s Counsel) stated to the jury,

“It is no part of your considerations to decide who ‘El Money’ is and what reason he might have had to co-ordinate the actions of these defendants against these properties and this car associated with the prime minister.”

“El Money” is the pseudonym by which the instigator of the attacks went, according to the defendants who claimed that he paid them for carrying out the arson. Thus, at no point has the reason for the attacks been examined, nor has there been an explanation as to who El Money, with his Russian accent may be. Not that that has stopped the BBC from falsely claiming it is a Russian plot.

Russia was behind arson attacks targeting PM, BBC reveals

The lack of reason is the hole in the middle of this judicial doughnut that sits there like a deafening silence. The entire operation has caused some discombobulation in the minds of the reporters and, seemingly, in that of the defending barrister also,

It is a bizarre episode over which the narrative hangs like a string vest, full of holes. The defendants claimed that the shadowy (maybe non-existent would be more accurate a term) figure of El Money paid them a few thousand quid to carry out the attacks but no explanation as to why.

Further, what was the significance of the attacks being carried out by three allegedly homosexual ‘models’?

Why were the infamous tabloid ‘newshounds’ not digging into it the bones of a story so extraordinary and scandalous that, on the face of it, it had the potential to bring down the government just as the Profumo Affair had done so in the 1960s?

Speculation naturally arose across the ‘alternative media’ – was Sir Kweir Starmer involved in a homosexual arrangement with the three young men? Had he failed to pay them for services rendered?

Was the failure to pay the reason behind the attacks? Is his marriage a lavender one?

What about his inexplicable relationship with the openly ‘gay’ Mohammedan, Lord ‘Back’ Ali?

What of the Ukrainian connection? Why did he appear to so overly tactile towards the puppet president of the Ukraine, the Jewish Zelensky, who at one meeting appeared to be wearing his trousers back to front?

What about the strange episode of the cocaine on the Ukrainian train?

Is Starmer a closet homosexual who is being easily bribed and manipulated by those who control him under the threat of exposure of some perverted or vile act?

What about his close connection to the homosexual Peter Mandelson, another member of the ‘Gay Mafia’?

The fact that there are so many unanswered questions is, I’d posit, beyond strange.

It should also be noted that Starmer is a demonstrable liar: one bizarre example is that of him lying in his public assertion that he is from a Jewish family:

“I don’t know how many people know this but my, my, um, my parents’ family are Jewish and we’ve got extended family in Israel.”

Quite how and why he should make such an assertion is, like all of it, beyond reason.

It is this lack of reason that looms over him like a craggy mist that is never dispelled.

Remember, I am focusing only two matters that are without reason and which point, therefore, to him being a most unreasonable man. Does this clear and apparent lack of reason means that he is a madman?

Some would argue that he must be a madman to wish to impose a Draconian social media age restriction on social media and a subsequent digital identity requirement over the adult population as he attempting right now with the latest legislation that he is attempting to crow-bar in:

“GB News posted a clip of journalist Christopher Hope questioning UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer on whether new powers for a social media ban on under-16s could be misused by future governments to restrict access based on political views rather than child safety.

Starmer announced on June 15, 2026, plans to ban children under 16 from major platforms including TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, X, and others, with legislation expected before Christmas 2026 and enforcement by spring 2027 via age verification requirements.

The exchange highlights ongoing debates over online child protection versus free speech risks, with the policy framed by Starmer as preventing adult online contact with minors amid concerns about addiction, bullying, and harm.” (Grok summary)

It is also worth noting that although Elon Musk has denounced the measures, he himself is joined at the hip with Palantir, the company that is most likely to benefit from it. The following screenshot illustrates the point perfectly: what is going on is a gentle tip-toe towards full-on digital I.D and currency, with the Deep State contractors, Palantir and X all over it like a dose of herpes.

Note too how the legislation purports to grant special immunities to the political class, who along with the aforementioned and all the white collar criminals stand as the greatest threat to the well-being of everyone.

The reason behind that may well lie in the fact that, proportionately speaking, a large number of Parliamentarians have many skeletons in their closets as well as a plethora of perverted predilections that they do not want exposed and subjected to examination.

Covering all this up during an ever-unfolding Apocalypse is an impossible task for, no matter what lengths they go to cover up their wrongdoings, the truth always comes out. In these times, it is coming out more rapidly than ever.

The strange trial of Starmer’s Rent Boys was a judicial nonsense. In the simplest of terms, the establishment always protects its own and a Knight of the Realm fits exactly into that class of protected personages.

In return for certain protections, the same knight has to follow his instructions, no matter how outlandish, ridiculous or unreasonable they are.

Are they out of their minds?

When I see a Labour minister, a veritable harpie, banging on about banning VPNs, a Prime Minister falsely stating that the measures are to protect children (something that no parliamentarian ever gives a toss about) and a judge claiming that a trial should not go into the reasons why three young foreign gay boys attacked the properties of said PM, then I can only conclude that, on the face of it, they are all out of their minds.

Reason has given way to gross materialism, to the filthy accumulation of Shekels and a Satanic lust for control over others in each and every one of them.

And that, dear reader, is the absolute and unreasonable state of things. And yet it is also necessary during the times of Apocalypse. Wrong uns trying to hide stuff is nothing less than a foolish exercise, doomed to failure.

Let the hilarity continue!