Quango – quasi independent government body – doesn’t sound like a successful idea does it.
Thu 9:50 am +00:00, 18 Jan 2024 3Quango abolition
Recent governments have allowed too many so called independent bodies to continue, to increase their fees, charges and budgets and often do a poor job. When they let us down Ministers get the blame, as the Environment Agency has on sewage discharges, the Rail regulators and public sector bodies have on train services, the North Sea Transition Authority has on energy self sufficiency and cost, The Post Office has on treatment of its sub postmasters, HS2 has over building a railway to time and budget, the Highways Agency has over keeping the main roads open and free flowing and the Border controllers have over illegal migration to name a few. The public want controlled migration, good roads, affordable railways, well run Post Offices , more of our own oil and gas for our needs and clean water. They do not want Ministers who say it was not us, and responsible bodies who suddenly claim it was nothing to do with them. Ministers tell me with these bodies they are warned off intervening and told they have independent powers. In practice they are creatures of the state. Ministers need to get them reporting to them in an agreed and sensible way. Ministers should act as the non executive chairman or the responsible shareholder, They can delegate their authority but they need to know the up to date position, supervise the annual report and the budgets, and ask good questions if there are complaints. They need to be ready to praise or blame, reward or fire the top management related to their conduct and performance. In some cases we would be better off without these bodies. Take the work back into the department and supervise it directly. |
What really matters Tap is, who controls and issues the money which at the moment is that foreign power known as the city of London. Nothing will change until we take back control of our money. We don’t even have money now as it is mainly debt notes!
Yes it’s a key point newensign. The money deception is so simple and yet most folk don’t have a clue, which always dismays me
I freely admit that it took me until my 60’s before I understood all this. I didn’t have a clue until then. Bill Still’s classic video “The Money Masters” [it’s still on JewTube] opened the door for my research. Once I started looking then, the scales soon fell from my eyes. I told anyone who would listen at the time, but most wouldn’t, their eyes glazed over, which always puzzled me
In a sane world then, the origins of our money would surely be on the school curriculum for every teenager. It’s well capable of being understood by that age. Instead there is absolute silence. And a vast army of finance “experts” is always available, to talk lots of jargon. Jargon that is incredibly simple at root, but clouds understanding in practice. It’s the same for most subjects too, Accounting, Banking, Physics, Lawyers etc etc etc
But I was still ignorant in my halcyon business days in my 40’s and 50’s! Even though when I first became a company director in my twenties then, I was exposed to old school lawyers, accountants and bankers. I had literally zero knowledge of their principles and their ways but it didn’t take me long to realise that they were full of jargon shite, common sense
I sacked our accountants and lawyers as a result and replaced them with more clued up guys. But I still didn’t twig the banking deception! That took me another 30+ years. And it was thanks to sites like the Tap. Who peddle “disinformation” in the current rancid jargon. You’ve got to laugh or you would cry….
Good point.