Why did Russia not take down the bridges over the Dniepro?
Tue 10:24 pm +00:00, 9 Jun 2026 2Stanislav asks the obvious question. He can’t see why the bridges were left standing all this time.
Russians don’t want a deal. They want capitulation by Kiev and by NATO. Russians are angry.
Pregozin recruited from the prisons, gave them no training, mostly thieves. He suffered 18,000 casualties going faster than the Russian military. He threw people away. He embezzled funds. The Ukrainians similarly don’t care about casualties.
Russia has 350,000 soldiers in the Ukrainian theatre with troops rotating out so a million can get experience of battle. Russia needs to go West of the Dniepr, as Ukraine is full of Nazis. It will be a hotbed of western terrorists if left intact which will continue to attack Russia. Help Hungary to grab back their lands and Slovaks.
BREAKING NEWS
Explosions in Banddar Abbas.
It’s a very good question
Rurik says that it’s because the whole war is a theatre for the masses. And that the Russians are controlled by the “Intelligence” blob just like everywhere else is. And that Russians are the junior partners. And the Yanks/Brits call all the shots
Makow say’s similar, it’s a theatre production, that its all about Chabad, that Trump, Netanyahoo and Putin and Xi are all Freemasons
And Trump, Net and Put are all members of Chabad too. They certainly all use Masonic handshakes and there is plenty of photographic evidence that they all bow the knee to the usual suspects too. Chabad Lubavitch is head office isn’t it?
Certainly something is amiss in the standard narrative. Meanwhile the meat grinder grinds away and continues to kill more and more Slavs. It’s Satanic and nauseating
Maybe it’s a combination of both, Freemasons and Intelligence. Certainly that must include Talmudic Zionism. Putin was a KGB agent wasn’t he? An “ex” agent according to the narrative. Ex? Is that ever true of such characters?
Greg Hallet’s book asserts that, at the very top level then, WW2 was a war between factions within Freemasonry. British/German v French. And that all sides were comprehensively infiltrated with Intelligence agents. So Intelligence was above the public facing politician too. And nothing about that war should be accepted on it’s face
Certainly his stories about the British Monarchy are very revealing. Particularly Edward VIII and his concubine Wallis. What a pair of wrong ‘uns they were. If the British public had been told half of this story then the monarchy would have fallen. Pretty well all the Monarchies fell in 20th C but the British [really German] Monarchy somehow survived
The book is co-authored by “Spymaster”, so needs to be taken with a large pinch of salt. It’s a fascinating read regardless and lots of it rings very true