Is WW3 Really Real or Great Reset Theater?
Sat 11:40 am +00:00, 18 Apr 2026
Source: https://www.unz.com/article/is-ww3-really-real-or-great-reset-theater/
George Orwell’s prescient novel 1984 envisioned a dystopia where 3 global powers, East Asia, Eurasia, and Oceania, engage in endless war and constantly shifting alliances, yet really cooperate under the same one-world government. Are we there? Is WW3 Great Reset theater played out by captured fake governments that ends with 3 mega-corporation dictatorships under ZioCorp singularity? If so, how would you know? If not, how would you know?
The question of a fake multi-polar world deserves analysis, not as a far-fetched theory barely worth debunking, but because of its possibility. If a cabal holds the power to create money out of thin air, and the world runs on capital, couldn’t those apex owners purchase every governmental and corporate entity in the world?
Each segment of the International bankers’ world war (WW1 & WW2) ended old orders and established new ones while leaving the bankers on top. Evolving WW3 appears to contain the same agenda, with an unprecedented techno-dystopian component.
From my observation, WW3 officially began with the US-Zio COVID bio-attack against China and Iran (that came with upward wealth transfer and global control grid benefits), or NATO’s expansion into Ukraine.
Russian vs. Ukraine seamlessly emerged from instantly disappeared COVID. This congruence indicates that both operations originated from the same apex source (or more likely their think tanks and or AI), given the lock-step coordination of every sector of the US Anglo-Zionist Empire and its vassals. With COVID, even those outside the Western bloc fell into line to one degree or another. The few leaders who opted out of the program quickly expired, e.g, the Presidents of Burundi and Tanzania.
Two polar-opposite groups tend to push the “we’re already in 1984″ theory. The first camp consists of legitimate geopolitical analysts who notice similar high-tech surveillance and other control grid mechanisms that cut across all nations. The second camp contains IDF Unit 8200/Deep State trolls who steer people away from supporting the anti-US/Zio Empire bloc of China, Iran, and Russia.
In Orwell’s 1984, world war acted as the catalyst that ushered in one-world-government. Creating a new and more anti-human system requires collapsing old systems. Non-fictionally, this manifested via false flags, engineered mass migrations, the #MeToo/ziofeminist f@gg!tization psyop- no offense to the gay community, COVID, MIC austerity, and energy and food insecurity exacerbated by the recent Strait of Hormuz crisis.
The World Economic Forum informed us that 2030 is the expected completion date.
For the elevated geopolitical analyst, the ability to recognize patterns and predict flows becomes even more critical in the “simulacra and simulation” of Fake AI video and continuous psyops. The digital world ushered us into end-stage illusion or “maya,” to use the Hindu term.
We live in “interesting times,” and in this phase, I take the position that China, Iran, and Russia remain independent nations run by ruling classes capable of making decisions outside the jurisdiction of the global apex owners. Lacking apex-insider data, I freely admit this is conjecture, but offer the following 3-nation analysis to support my thesis.
China:
Many point to China’s harsh COVID lockdown policies as proof of CPC capture by the WEF. However, what if the CPC suspected a US-Zio bioweapon attack from the jump? Would COVID morph into a super-plague? Sometimes over-caution trumps under-caution, with the idea of better-too-far than not-far-enough. In hindsight, going too far created more problems, but how could China have known that at the time?
To China’s credit, it opted for old-school attenuated-virus vaccines rather than ZioCorp mRNA. From my viewpoint, COVID was a low-grade bioweapon best handled through natural immunity coupled with Vitamins D & C, herbs, and similar remedies. If it happens again, I recommend that the CPC explore China’s 5000-year-old traditional medicine cabinet.
If China wants WW3, why invest so much capital and labor into building BRI? Supply chain infrastructure is vulnerable to drone-missile warfare and proxy armies. Look at the precarious position of Gulf State energy fields.
The CPC seems to want to raise the standard of living for the average Chinese citizen. The Great Reset model promotes austerity, gross wealth inequality, and cultural decline.
What about CPC domestic surveillance? China has a long history of outsider invasion, as well as destabilizing dynastic, ideological, and power-grab civil wars. The CIA recently staged a failed color revolution in Hong Kong and continues to promote unrest in China’s Muslim region. With over a billion people, China prizes stability- especially with world war and global economic shockwaves on the horizon.
In a post-US-Zio Empire world, would China need strong internal policing? Not if it continues to incorporate win-win game theory into domestic politics.
Tao says that the country with a lot of cops is a criminal nation. The ruling class that exploits the people needs a strong security state, e.g., USA, EU, UK, AUS. If the ruling class acts for the benefit of the people, then the people would tear to pieces anyone who tried to usurp the leadership.
Most street-level crime stems from neoliberal capitalist manufactured poverty. A high-technology Middle Kingdom with Confucian-Tao foundations that creates a post-scarcity environment for its citizens need not worry about muggers and pickpockets.
For the foreseeable future, nations will become more authoritarian. Technological advancements in control grid surveillance play a large role. Regardless of ideology, ruling classes want to stay in power. From a nation-state survival standpoint, as every legitimate-grievance protest gets hijacked by the CIA/Mossad, even benign governments shut them down quickly. Look what happened with the Arab Spring.
This universal move toward authoritarianism represents the ruling classes’ attempt to hold on to Piscean Age paradigms as the chi pushes humanity into the Aquarian Age. Ultimately, they can’t stop it. Either the system evolves, or it pops.
The big difference between China and the West is that most Chinese support their government. The CPC invests in its society, while the Western parasitic ruling class views its subjects as either herd animals who offer minuscule value as labor/resource units or useless disposables when replaced by AI, outsourcing, or automation. The Western serfs’ realization of their predicament generates mass resentment, initiating tighter clampdowns from the top. When high-tech police states become reform & revolution-proof, collapse becomes the only vehicle for change.
“Western” hegemonic narrative suppressed the depth and scope of ancient Chinese spiritual-philosophy. The “Hundred Schools of Thought” not only produced the equivalent of Stoics, Cynics, and Platonists, but much, much more.
Out of the mix, two dominant Chinese philosophies emerged- Confucianism and Tao.
The Confucian sage Mencius found yin-yang balance by incorporating Tao. His theory of sage-emperor governance, derived from ruler-subject empathy, evolved into CPC win-win game theory. The 9 Fields teaches the yin-yang balance of collective welfare and ethical entrepreneurship.
China plans to become the high-technology Middle Kingdom. If China merges its cultural spiritual-philosophy with high-technology, then China’s absorption into an anti-human one-world-government becomes impossible, as Confucian-Tao yin-yang balance is pro-human. If China severs its ancient roots and becomes a purely materialist technocracy, it loses its chi, making it vulnerable to globalist techno-finance takeover, whether through external pressure or internal treason.
Unlike the West, I surmise that a sufficient number of China’s political class retain the integrity, long-term foresight, and Tao cellular memory to keep them from selling their people’s DNA, history, and culture to ZioCorp.
China’s current strategy comes down to keeping as much distance as possible from the US-Zio axe-wielding maniac while the maniac swings himself into collapsed exhaustion. As Sun Tzu said, “Never interfere with an enemy in the process of destroying himself.”
The evolving philosophical question becomes: how far do you let the axe-wielding maniac go? If he continues his rampage, do you engage when he enters your front yard or wait until his axe strikes your front door? If Chinese intelligence determined that COVID was a targeted bioattack, then the front door was breached- with plausible deniability.
Sometimes the wind converges the dual currents of strategy and courage. By what right does the US control and arm Taiwan? That’s like China building a navy base in Baltimore Harbor. If the maniac remains bogged down elsewhere, why not reclaim a potential hostile proximal launch pad and one’s sovereign territory?
Oh Emperor President Xi, under whose watch and legacy is wholeness restored?
Lao Zi described the indescribable by not describing it. During “interesting times,” I flap my little butterfly wings into the Tao interface. What else can I do? I am meaningless and nothingness.
Iran:
Is the Iranian government play-acting its role in the US-Zio war of aggression? I think the martyrdom of Ayatollah Khamenei and other members of Iran’s government answers that question. Contrast Iran’s leadership with the Western political class. It’s like comparing eagles to tapeworms. I find it difficult to believe that IRI leaders sacrificed schoolgirls as part of WEF theater.
While the closure of the Strait of Hormuz plays into the WEF Malthusian agenda, that doesn’t mean Iran was in on the scheme. Iran’s closure of the passageway provides a powerful bargaining chip. If Iran were a WEF operative, why offer Hormuz access to non-belligerents?
During the COVID pandemic, Iran banned ZioCorp mRNA vaccines. I think that says a lot.
Petro Civilization runs on petro-energy, petrochemicals, and petro-dollars. This puts independent petro-producers like Iran in the crosshairs. Under petro-dollar game theory, petro-states become either vassals or enemies.
Petro Civilization destroys Earth’s fragile ecosystems, and its petrodollar creates debt-slave societies. Harmonious ecological and technological evolution requires gradient transition to clean, limitless energy (China’s Artificial Sun, hydrogen, etc.) and an economic system that uses money as a medium of exchange and real-value creation rather than an instrument of usury-based financial predation.
For Iran, Petro Civilization realpolitik hit hard when the CIA and MI6 overthrew democratic socialist President Mosaddegh in 1953, followed by the implantation of a US puppet ruler and police state.
Decades of post-revolution sanctions created much economic suffering for Iran. Mossad and the CIA took advantage of Iran’s strained economy via their failed “democracy anti-hijab revolution.”
Petro-politics aside, why the Talmudic cellular memory antipathy toward Iran? I think the Bible offers the best explanation.
In the Tao interpretation of the biblical story of Esther, organized Jewry (no longer called Hebrews / Israelites by this time) set up an Epstein-style honey trap via the beautiful Esther (probably a Lauren Bacall-looking Jewess skilled in the sexual arts) to infiltrate the Persian monarchy. Haman, an overboard Persian patriot unfamiliar with karmic principle, failed to prevent the takeover, speeding up Persian Empire degeneration.
Prior to precursor-Zionism’s ancient Persian government coup, like the United States, Cyrus the Great made the mistake of bankrolling an apostate-Israel revival. Rather than show gratitude, Jewish supremacists exterminated the locals and stabbed Persia in the back. History rhymed with the JFK assassination, the USS Liberty, 9/11, Epstein blackmail, Palestinian genocide, and Iran war.
Somewhere along the line, international Jewry lost its grip on Persia (Iran). For Zionists, the post-Mosaddegh installation of the Shah of Iran represented a modern Purim miracle, while his ouster became a calamity of biblical proportions.
To be clear, I’m not speaking about non-involved Jews. A Jewish-Persian community continues to live in Iran, and despite Zionist machinations, is afforded protection by the magnanimous Iranian government. As an advanced Shia civilization, Iran understands the spiritual importance of separating non-involved “People of the Book” Jews from satanic Jews. Due to the egregious crimes of organized Jewry, that requires vetting all Jews. “Never make the same mistake twice.”
Jews of Yemen, Iraq, Persia, Palestine, Afghanistan, etc., coexisted peacefully with their Muslim and Christian neighbors for a millennium. Why? Because Islam forbade usury, which prevented organized Jewry from taking over West Asian economies. That trend reversed following Sykes-Picot. When West Asian Jews fled to apostate-Israel post-1948 due to Mossad false flags, they were absorbed into the Zionist hive mind and became TBR (Talmudic Beyond Repair).
If Iran is a real nation-state, which I believe it is, then the Iranian people are holy warriors who took on the US Anglo-Zionist Empire and its international banker owners.
Russia:
Of all 3 countries, Russia remains the most Zionist influenced, due in large part to the ethnic makeup of the post-Soviet oligarchy, the two million Russian dual-national Israeli passport holders, and a large Chabad Lubavitch presence.
The big question is- where is President Putin’s head at? I can only offer conjecture, as I don’t live in his head.
President Putin works within the political environment he inherited / took over. Given the position of today’s Russia compared to 1990s Russia, I think he did a good job. If Mr. Putin sold out his country to Rothschild Zionists, Russia would likely be on the same downward socio-economic trajectory as the US.
While Mr. Putin went hardcore on the lockdowns and mandatory vaccines, Sputnik was not ZioCorp mRNA. One could attribute his push for vaccines over natural immunity to the technocratic mindset that views laboratory solutions as always superior to natural ones. When COVID hit, Mr. Putin was still pushing hard for Russian-Western integration, making him more likely to adopt WEF health protocols. Post Ukraine conflict, he may see things differently.
Some cite Mr. Putin’s “Wailing Wall photo-op” as proof of his subservience to Rothschild Zionism. As previously stated, Mr. Putin initially wanted to integrate into the Western bloc. Becoming a “Western-approved” leader required a Wailing Wall pic as a sign of deference to international Jewry- at least until Oct. 7th.
So what is President Putin’s connection to international Jewish finance?
The story I received from a Russian source, which I can’t prove, but seems plausible, is that Mr. Putin was in Boris Yeltsin’s circle during the Wall Street-led privatization of Russian industries and assets. After taking their cut, the Jewish capitalists handed over the remaining loot to Jewish communist party insiders, as the Wall Street raiders felt more comfortable dealing with fellow Jews.
The problem for the neophyte Russian-Jewish oligarchs was that the Soviet financial system collapsed, making it difficult to deposit hundreds of billions of dollars in illegally obtained assets with sketchy sales receipts into secure Western banks. As a KGB lawyer, Mr. Putin set up a trust to legally hold the shady assets, allowing many Jewish insiders to deposit their illicit holdings into it. When things stabilized, and the Jews showed up to withdraw their loot, Mr. Putin told them to f*ck off.
That is one story of how Mr. Putin became one of Russia’s richest men. To solidify his position, he made realpolitik alliances with most of the remaining Russian-Jewish oligarchs, while assassinating or imprisoning problematic ones. To President Putin’s credit, he reduced the number of dual-national oligarchs from the near 100% 1990s.
What about President Putin abandoning his Syrian ally? Like Kenny Rogers sang, “you got to know when to walk away and know when to run.” US-NATO incursion into Ukraine presented an existential threat to Russia, and I think Mr. Putin wanted to focus on that. He also likely considered Syria a lost cause.
As for Ukraine?
Given the hostile proliferation of NATO weapon systems and biolabs on Russia’s doorstep, I think President Putin had to take military action. What would America do if an army with a long nation-wrecking track record amassed along the US border?
Some criticize President Putin for not going full “shock and awe” blitzkrieg, the argument being that a half-measured approach increased Russian casualties and dragged out the war.
Despite Mr. Putin’s Machiavellian traits, I think he follows some kind of code that seeks to minimize civilian casualties (particularly women and children), even if it puts his fighters at greater risk. The 1930s Holodomor preceded World War II conflagration. The Ukrainians are “people of the earth.” Mr. Putin strikes me as a man who understands karmic principle.
One must also consider the possibility that Russia’s prosecution of the war reflects its maximum military capability. Russia is not just fighting the formidable Ukrainian army, but also the US and NATO.
While a decaying empire, the US holds the petro-dollar printing press and the world’s largest/ bloated military, which allows it to prosecute wars “indefinitely,” i.e., until economic collapse.
Like WWI’s tanks, airplanes, and trench warfare, AI, along with drone-missile coordination, presented a new era of tactics and technology that came with a learning curve. Russia lags behind the US in satellite numbers, an instrumental component of drone-missile warfare, and is now playing catch-up with its recent flurry of launches.
The Russian-Ukrainian slow war of attrition shows that EU technocrats lied about Russia blitzkrieging its way to the French Riviera. The real motive behind the EU’s war against Russia is to transition Europe from a Euro-culture social safety net society into a dead-culture MIC-austerity police state. Like the US-Zio Empire, the EU is totally captured by the international bankers, and all in with the Great Reset.
What about President Putin’s war against Ukraine’s “Nazis?”
While Operation Barbarossa hit Russia hard, Hitler’s Germany no longer exists. Zelenskyy said he wanted to turn Ukraine into “Big Israel,” not “Big Germany.” The only “nazis” left in power are “zio-nazis.” Banderite neonazis exist because of Zionists and the US/NATO goon squad. Zelenskyy’s government is a Zionist money laundering and ethnic cleansing operation.
Rather than wage a denazification war, I think President Putin needs to enforce de-zionification, which entails purging Russia’s dual-national oligarchs from power and “re-nationalizing” their assets as well as deactivating the passports of the remaining 2 million dual-nationals who, via Zionist hive-mind exposure, are likely TBR (Talmudic Beyond Repair). Jettisoning the dual-passport holders from top down eliminates much of the problem. Handle the rest of it by “re-nationalizing” the global Jew mafia-infested Russian Central Bank.
How can Russia clean out the Zionists from Ukraine’s car if it can’t remove the Zionists from its own?
I in no way advocate for across-the-board Jewish persecution, as many Russian Jews make positive contributions to the country. I think Mr. Putin loves “good” Jews. So do I, although I never claimed to be “good.” I live in the Tao. I just am.
Wars end when the nations of the world come together and arrest the world’s 3000 richest Jew bankers along with their associates, and then seize their assets under existing racketeering laws. Rothschild family wealth is estimated as high as 500 trillion. Or create new collective-agreement money symbols that bypass the Synagogue of Satan’s money-symbol illusion system. You’d even save the Jews. For some reason, no one seems able to play a new money game. Perhaps after the collapse of the TBR Oceania Empire and its MIC.
The problem with BRICS, besides its Goldman Sachs given acronym, is that the Jewish financial mafia runs the central banks of most members. That’s like swallowing a tapeworm to kill a tapeworm. BRICS, while a great concept, suffers from the same infiltration as crypto currencies.
From a military strategy perspective, I think Mr. Putin needs to start playing quid pro quo. For example, if the Zelenskyy regime sends drones to assassinate President Putin, respond in kind.
While WW3 is a cognitive and physical war, it’s also a spiritual war. To win, Russia needs a spiritual battery. The Russian Orthodox Church seems like the logical choice. Obviously, Russia’s Muslims utilize Islam.
I think too much time has elapsed for most ethno-Russians to plug pre-Christian Rus religion into Cosmic Intelligence, although that might work for some. Regardless of symbol, archetype, or myth, I always recommend incorporating Tao. As a universal application, Tao is compatible with both ancient and Kardashev Level II Civilization. May the Tao be with you.
When the war finally ends, I think the likely outcome is that Russia annexes the eastern section of Ukraine and cedes western Ukraine to BlackRock.
I try to stay out of Russian car politics. Apologies to the Russian national reader for straying outside my lane. I view Russia as a high-civilization and want to see the long-suffering Russian people enjoy peace and prosperity.
Remember the brief Soviet-US joint space program? Imagine if the US rejected endless war and partnered not only with Russia, but also China and Iran (and the EU, Japan, etc.) to create global post-scarcity living via peaceful technology. We’d probably be at Kardashev Level I by now.
That’s not to put down low-technology societies. Is the bugged-out Big Pharma “stabilized” high-tech man who stares into a toxic screen all day superior to the rainforest shaman who knows the secret miracle healing plants? Like money worship, technology worship leads to negative outcomes. Use them as tools, not gods. Techno-finance dystopia represents the worst of both worlds.
I respect Mr. Putin’s intellect and his talent as a statesman. He helped Russia transition from post-communism to capitalism. As usury-capitalism enters its end-stage, I hope President Putin rejects WEF neo-feudal technocracy and opts for the next phase of positive national evolution.
Circling back to the question of whether WW3 is Great Reset theater- I think it is for some, while for others, represents an attack on their civilization.
WW3 could also be an eschatological collective psyche implant.
Or a dying petro-dollar empire caught in a Thucydides Trap.
Or a revelator’s tuned-in hallucinogenic prophecy.
Or the Greater apostate-Israel Project gone wild.
Or Western kakistocratic degenerative insanity.
Or Peak Evil.
Or the final phase of the international bankers’ business model.
Or Fermi Paradox techno-filter.
Or Talmud vs. Tao.
Or the turbulent transition from the Piscean Age (authoritarianism & controlled scarcity) to the Aquarian Age (freedom & abundance).
Or all of the above.
If one-world-ZioCorp currently exists and holds the power to create such an elaborate WW3 simulation, then you have nothing to lose by supporting the China-Iran-Russia bloc. It’s already a done deal.
Conversely, if high-tech “Kingdom of Hell on Earth” remains a work in progress, then you have everything to lose by not supporting the China-Iran-Russia bloc.
If one gets co-opted, support the two. If two get co-opted, support the one. If three get co-opted, we’re f*cked. At least until a meteor hits.
Even if an evil one-world government runs everything, by resisting the anti-human US-Zio Empire, you oppose part of the beast. How can that be wrong?
