Dump’s Commonwealth Move and the Technocratic Threat: A Eurocentric Nightmare Unfolding?

Download this post…

On my latest broadcast, I sat down with Patrick Wood of Technocracy.news to unpack two jaw-dropping developments that should have every American on high alert: President Trump’s stunning decision to make the U.S. an associate member of the Commonwealth—headed by King Charles III—and the sinister influence of technocrat Curtis Yarvin on the MAGA inner circle. These aren’t isolated events; they’re threads in a tapestry that could lead to a Eurocentric world government, a technocratic dystopia, and the end of America as we know it. Let’s dive in.

Trump’s Commonwealth Gambit: A Step Toward Eurocentric Control?

The headline hit like a ton of bricks: “Trump Stunningly Agrees U.S. Will Become Associate Member of the Commonwealth.” With King Charles III at the helm—a man I’ve long warned about for his role in pushing Agenda 21 and 2030, dating back to his pre-Rio Earth Summit meeting on the royal yacht in 1992—this move is baffling. “I love King Charles,” Trump tweeted, calling him “Charles in charge.” I get the ceremonial aspect—membership is voluntary, mostly symbolic, covering 2.7 billion people across nations. But as I said on air, “I thought the Declaration of Independence was about freeing ourselves. Do we really want to have our country involved in some association with King Charles?”

Patrick Wood was equally stunned. “This is the craziest thing I ever saw,” he said. We speculated on Trump’s motives—could this be a chess move to iron out tariff disputes with Canada, a Commonwealth member? Or is it a step toward full membership, as the article suggests, pulling the U.S. into a Eurocentric orbit? King Charles, a radical World Economic Forum green agenda advocate, isn’t just a figurehead; his family’s legacy is steeped in globalist ideology. Prince Philip once quipped about reincarnating as a virus to solve overpopulation (whether he meant it or not, it’s telling). Now, Prince William—already making tough calls in the royal family, as British press reports—is riding tanks with NATO in Estonia, echoing his father’s environmentalist zeal. “The fruit always falls close to the tree,” Patrick noted.

This isn’t just about ceremony. As I’ve warned in books like The Coming Religious Reich, a Eurocentric world government aligns with Bible prophecy—where nations like Turkey, Iran, Russia, and Israel are named, but America is conspicuously absent. Are we being absorbed into a North American union under European dominance? With Europe pushing a digital euro by fall, and Dick Morris warning in 2008 about George W. Bush subordinating us to the European-dominated Financial Stability Board, this Commonwealth move could be a step toward that reality. “Maybe America finds itself shoved right back under Europe,” I said. Joan Veon, a Christian researcher who passed over a decade ago, called Charles the “sustainable prince” and potential Antichrist in her book. Was she just a generation early, with William now in the wings?

The Technocratic Threat: Curtis Yarvin’s Dark Enlightenment

The second bombshell is even more chilling: Curtis Yarvin, a Silicon Valley tech bro turned philosopher, is influencing key MAGA figures like J.D. Vance, Peter Thiel, and Elon Musk with his “Dark Enlightenment” ideology. Yarvin advocates for a tech monarchy, where sovereign corporations (SovCorps) rule every square foot of Earth as a technocracy, using AI to govern without regard for the people. “He really wants to destroy our country and reform it into something different,” Patrick warned, citing Yarvin’s vision of a monarchy styled after a tech startup, complete with dystopian surveillance and AI-driven governance.

Yarvin’s ideas are gaining traction. J.D. Vance has praised him, saying, “The task of the conservative right now is to preserve as much as can be preserved, and then when the inevitable collapse comes, you build back the country in a way that’s actually better.” That sounds eerily like Biden’s “Build Back Better” or the Cloward-Piven strategy to collapse the system—except this time, it’s coming from the right. Elon Musk’s “Dark MAGA” hat, worn since November, signals his alignment with Yarvin’s philosophy. “He’s signaling that the Dark Enlightenment is his philosophy,” Patrick said. Peter Thiel calls Yarvin his “house philosopher,” and figures like David Sacks and Mark Andreessen are on board.

Yarvin’s plan? Win an electoral mandate, declare a state of emergency, and purge the federal bureaucracy—his “RAGE” (Retire All Government Employees) strategy, which mirrors DOGE’s mass firings. Then, replace them with loyalists and AI systems. “Every person that loses a job here is going to be replaced by AI,” Patrick predicted, pointing to Sam Altman’s OpenAI Gov product, set to launch this month, which will let government agencies analyze data in the cloud with AI. “We’re headed for an AI-style governance system in America, not run by people, but run by algorithm,” he warned. “This is very, very dangerous.”

A Stupendous Crisis: The Globalist Playbook

This isn’t new—it’s a playbook I’ve warned about for decades. In my 2011 book Religious Trojan Horse, I quoted James McGregor Burns from his 1984 book The Power to Lead: “I doubt that Americans under normal conditions would agree on the package of radical and alien constitutional changes that would be required. They would do so, I think, only during and following a stupendous national crisis and political failure.” Yarvin and Vance’s talk of an “inevitable collapse” fits this perfectly. So does the push for a constitutional convention (Con-Con), which I’ve opposed alongside Phyllis Schlafly and John Stormer, whose book None Dare Call It Treason sold 7 million copies. Stormer noted that globalists like Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski first called for a Con-Con in the 1970s, hoping a crisis would enable radical reforms—like a European parliamentary system or technocracy.

Yarvin’s vision aligns with Agenda 21 and 2030, which I’ve warned about since my 2009 book Grave Influence. It’s communitarianism—big government and big business merging into unelected boards that control communities, creating 15-minute cities and planned societies. “Pretty soon you have no cars in parts of town, all bikes,” I said. “It wasn’t the elected officials. It was big business and globalists doing it together.” Under Yarvin’s SovCorps, you’d have no voice at all—just AI enforcing the technocrats’ will. “The AI system is going to do what it’s told to do,” I warned. “You’re talking about a system that would make us long for the bureaucrats.”

The Endgame: A Scientific Dictatorship

Patrick’s warning was stark: “Once the scientific dictatorship takes over, how do you get rid of it? You can’t pull the plug—they’re building their own nuclear power plants to run their data centers.” AI is doubling in capability every three and a half months; by the end of Trump’s term, it’ll be 16,000 times more powerful. “Could we possibly have an election again?” Patrick asked. “Will AI take over and manipulate people to where an election just isn’t needed?” Yarvin’s ideas are “the equivalent of what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf,” he added. “If these come true, history is done as far as we’re concerned. There’ll be no America, no Constitution, no Founding Fathers.”

I connected the dots to the Commonwealth move: if King Charles or William becomes a global monarch, and technocrats like Yarvin install an AI-driven monarchy, we’re looking at a Eurocentric, technocratic world government. “If we’re headed this direction, I’d put [William] on my short list” for the Antichrist, I said, noting his charisma and global appeal via Princess Diana and Kate Middleton. Trump may be unaware of the technocrats’ endgame, just as Reagan was played by George H. Bush’s circle. “Maybe President Trump doesn’t really realize what their overarching agenda is,” I mused.

Read full story here…