CHRISTINE LAGARDE JEWISH QUEEN OF EUROLAND and another fraud
Wed 10:59 am +00:00, 9 Apr 2025 2Source: https://mileswmathis.com/lagarde.pdf
by Pedro M. Ormazabal
Miles in green [visible at the above link with photos and links]
As is customary, I start with Wikipedia:
Christine Madeleine Odette Lagarde (born 1 January 1956) is a French politician and lawyer who has
been the President of the European Central Bank since 2019 [PMO same year Ursula was appointed
president of the European commission]. She previously served as the 11th Managing Director of the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) from 2011 to 2019. Lagarde had also served in the Government of
France, most prominently as Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industry from 2007 until 2011.
Wikipedia France provides a summary of the cursus honorum of Christine, as I am going to
refer to her from now on for the sake of brevity:
After her baccalauréat (h ig h sch o o l) i n 1 9 7 3 , s h e w e n t o n a n American Field
Service scholarship to the Holton-Arms School in Bethesda, Maryland. [20][21] During her year
in the United States, Lagarde worked as an intern at the U.S. Capitol as Representative William
Cohen’s congressional assistant.
Bethesda, eh? So recruited by the CIA at age 18, good to know. And already working for the
Cohens. In 1977 at age 21 she allegedly graduated from the Institute of Political Studies of
Aix-en-Provence, but since she was in DC for a year, that means she was only in Provence for
at most two years. So not really adding up. Especially since Holton-Arms is not a college. It
is a prep school, so she could not have transferred any credits from there. She then
supposedly got not one, not two, but three Masters degrees from Paris Nanterre University.
They don’t give us a date for that, but we do get a footnote. Unfortunately it goes nowhere,
and even the Wayback Machine takes you to a page that no longer exists at the Nouvele
Economiste. Hmmm, that’s convenient. So no proof of that. But we aren’t finished:
Lagarde graduated from law school at Paris Nanterre University and obtained a Master’s degree from
Sciences Po Aix.
So that’s now four Masters degrees and a Law Degree, supposing you are counting. Again no
dates, but we know this is fake because she was working for a law firm by 1981, at age 25.
So we are supposed to believe she got four Masters degrees and a Law degree by age 25,
getting five post-bachelor degrees in four years? If you don’t know, a law degree normally
takes three years and a Masters takes 2, so going by standard requirements it should have
taken her 15 years of school after highschool, taking her to age 33. So at age 25 she was eight
years advanced, or to say it another way, had skipped eight years somehow. I was two years
advanced by age 20, but I have shown you exactly how I did that, posting my diplomas. We
have no idea how she did it.
After being admitted to the Paris Bar, she joined the international law firm Baker & McKenzie as an
associate in 1981, specializing in labour and anti-trust, as well as mergers and acquisitions. Rising through
the ranks, she was a member of the executive committee of the firm from 1995 until 1999, before being
elevated to its Chair between 1999 and 2004 (..). She held the top post until she decided to go into public
service.
Not a slow elevation, so to speak. She was 40 in 95.
Lagarde returned to France when appointed Minister of Foreign Trade from 2005 to 2007, then briefly
served as Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries from May to June 2007, and finally, as Minister of
Finance from 2007 to 2011, (…). During her tenure, Lagarde oversaw the government response to the
2007-2008 financial crisis, for which the Financial Times ranked her the best finance minister in the
Eurozone
.
We are about to see how good she was as finance minister.
On 5 July 2011, she was elected to replace Dominique Strauss-Kahn as managing director of the IMF for
a five-year term. Her appointment was the 11th consecutive appointment of a European to head the IMF.
She was selected by consensus for a second five-year term, starting 5 July 2016, being the only candidate
nominated for the post.
She was such a good finance minister that:
In December 2016, a French court convicted her of negligence relating to her role in the Bernard Tapie
arbitration, but did not impose a penalty. Lagarde resigned from the IMF following her nomination as
president of the ECB.
I will presently look a bit more into that conviction and lack of penalty of the “best finance
minister of the Eurozone”. The reader by now knows what the story is all about, for it is not
very original.
Christine Lagarde was born in Paris, France, into a family of teachers. Her Father, Robert Lallouette,
“was born to a Jewish mother and a non-religious father”, and was an English teacher; her mother, Nicole
(Carré), was a Latin, Greek and French literature teacher. Lagarde and her three younger brothers spent
their childhood in Le Havre. There she attended the Lycée François 1er (where her father taught) and
Lycée Claude Monet.
Christine has a long name, Christine Madeleine Odette, which suggests that she is aristocracy.
Plebeians as a rule are not given so many names. However it may be, where does the surname
Lagarde come from? Christine was born Christine Madeleine Odette Lallouette. Wikipedia:
Lagarde has been in three long-term relationships, one of which has been confirmed to have resulted in a
marriage, while sources differ on whether the other two relationships resulted in a marriage. She married
her first partner, French financial analyst Wilfried Lagarde, in 1982 and divorced him in 1992. The
couple have two sons, Pierre-Henri Lagarde (born 1986) and Thomas Lagarde (born 1988). Her second
relationship was with the British businessman Eachran Gilmour. Sources differ on whether she ever
married Gilmour. Since 2006, she has been in a relationship with French entrepreneur Xavier Giocanti, a
fellow-student at Université Paris X. Some sources have described their relationship as married, but no
marriage date has ever been publicized.
If she has been divorced from Lagarde for 33 years, why does she still have his name? She
must not want you to see her maiden name Lallouette. That’s because they have misspelled it
on purpose at Wiki. It should be Lalouette, and they are in the British peerage, related to the
Edwardes, Barons Kensington, who come from the Douglases, Marquesses of Queensbury.
They then link us to the Scotts, Montagus, Erskines, and of course Stuarts. These Lalouettes
are sugar magnates, owning large parts of Mauritius. The Lalouettes were formerly
Lebeaus/Lebaults, allowing us to track them further. This links us to a Belgian Prime Minister
as well as to a famous American rabbi.
At Geni.com we are given the parents of Nicole Carré, the mother of Christine, as “private”.
However, Nicole married an English teacher who happened to have a Jewish mother and,
therefore, was technically Jewish. There may be something they did not want us to know
about the maternal line of Christine.
Namely, that the Carrés are also British peerage, having married the Baronets de la Pole in
1843, linking them to Admiral of the Fleet Sir John West. Phoenician Navy of course. This
also linked them forward to the Talbots (including Admiral Sir Hon. John Talbot), the
Arundels, and the Rhodes.
This also tells us what is being hidden:
In LinkedIn we find what follows:
I came to realise that my American host family was in fact “my” American family and that they loved me
in their own way. I began to appreciate that the all-girls school I attended offered an excellent education. I
discovered a terrific synchronised swimming team in the local Jewish community.
So Christine was admitted to an all-girls Jewish school. In other words: Christine is Jewish, as
are her mother and father. Moreover, Christine is a Jewish aristocrat. This is nothing new for
a reader of Miles, because we have seen that, as a rule, central bank governors are Jewish and
aristocrats. It seems that Christine is no exception to the rule.
In https://collive.com/imf-chief-returns-for-jewish-event/ we find something more significant
that, as far as I can see, settles the issue about the real character of Christine:
Christine Lagarde of the International Monetary Fund caught a flight after the historic climate agreement
in Paris to make it in time for a Jewish event.
In principle, planes are one of the most powerful sources of emission of that heinous CO2 that
is destroying the Earth, but if it comes to arriving on time to attend a Jewish ceremony in the
headquarters of the IMF, the “carbon footprint” of a long-distance flight, such as Paris-NY,
does not seem to matter much.
Here are some pictures of Christine with her pals in the ceremony:
Just hours after a historic climate agreement in Paris was reached [PMO: 2015], Christine Lagarde,
Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) returned to Washington, DC to participate
in “World of Light,” an international celebration marking the concluding moments of Chanukah.
The IMF, the organization which serves as the economic advisor and backstop for 188 countries, hosted
the unique event at its headquarters in cooperation with American Friends of Lubavitch (Chabad), the
Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) and the World Bank.
What are the IMF headquarters doing serving as a synagogue? Can you imagine that venue
being used for a Catholic Mass, for instance?
Standing alongside Madame Lagarde were President of the IADB Luis Alberto Moreno, Vice Chairman of the
Federal Reserve Stanley Fischer [PMO: and chief of the central bank of Israel], Israel’s Ambassador to the US
Ron Dermer, and Keith Hansen, World Bank Vice President for Human Development, representing President
Jim Yong Kim, who was en route to Asia at the time.
Chairing the event which was attended by hundreds of prominent global financiers, diplomats, and other
members of the international community was Rabbi Levi Shemtov, Executive Vice President of American
Friends of Lubavitch (Chabad) and Shliach in Washington, DC.
There you go: a rabbi chairing a Jewish ceremony in the premises of the IMF. With the very
head of the IMF present. This shows who is really in charge.
After remarks by Madame Lagarde, she lit a shamash along with President Moreno. The lights of the menorah
were then lit with the help of Mr. Fischer and Ambassador Dermer.
So Christine started the ceremony chaired by Rabbi Levi Shemtov, or what amounts to the
same, with the permission of Rabbi Levi Shemtov. I do not think that a Gentile would have
been given that privilege, let alone invited to the ceremony.
“These lights of the menorah are being lit literally for the last time this Chanukah”, said Rabbi Shemtov, “but as
the Lubavitcher Rebbe teaches us ‘zos Chanukah’ does not merely mean ‘this is it’ as in this is the end, rather,
this is ‘it’ the concept -fuller illumination of darkness and its ultimate elimination- to which we all must strive,
and to which we have symbolically been working toward for the last eight days.”
“While we recently felt the world’s heart torn apart -again- with the terrorist attacks in Paris [PMO: the rabbi
could not resist the opportunity of selling fake anti-Jewish events], we also saw the world come together, there,
in recent days. Regardless of your opinion about the climate agreement, the notion that representatives of
hundreds of nations, many of which would normally not find themselves in the same room, came together,
speaks loudly of hope and light, an appropriate message for these times.”
The distinguished guests, from dozens of countries were then treated to a beautiful musical program in multiple
languages by beloved Jewish performer Benny Amar, followed by an international cuisine prepared by
Executive Chef Avi Harouch.
What are those 2015 terrorist attacks of Paris that tore the heart of the world apart?
Wikipedia:
A series of coordinated Islamist terrorist attacks took place on Friday, 13 November 2015 [PMO: 2+1+5=8] in
Paris, France, and the city’s northern suburb, Saint-Denis. Beginning at 21:16 [PMO: and 2+6=8], three suicide
bombers struck outside the Stade de France in Saint-Denis, during an international football match, after failing to
gain entry to the stadium [PMO: they did not have the money to buy the tickets]. Another group of attackers then
fired on crowded cafés and restaurants in Paris, with one of them also detonating an explosive, killing himself in
the process. A third group carried out another mass shooting and took hostages at an Eagles of Death Metal
concert attended by 1,500 people in the Bataclan theatre, leading to a stand-off with police. The attackers were
either shot or detonated suicide vests when police raided the theatre.
And so Intel spared itself the trouble of having to CGI a lot of faces and fake pics. Perhaps
somebody might recognize one of them. Better to get rid of them and send them to someplace
where they can go unknown.
The attackers killed 130 people, including 90 at the Bataclan theatre. Another 416 [PMO: 4+1+6=11] people
were injured, almost 100 critically. Seven of the attackers were also killed. The attacks were the deadliest in the
European Union since the Madrid train bombings of 2004 [PMO: I deal with this fake in another paper, though
in Spanish]. The attacks came one day after similar attacks in Beirut, Lebanon. France had been on high alert
since the January 2015 attacks on Charlie Hebdo offices and a Jewish supermarket in Paris that killed 17 [PMO:
1+7=8] people.
As Miles has shown, all fake.
After her baccalauréat in 1973, she went on an American Field Service scholarship to the Holton-Arms School in
Bethesda, Maryland. [PMO: therefore, to be trained by the CIA] During her year in the United States, Lagarde
worked as an intern at the U.S. Capitol as Representative William Cohen’s congressional assistant, helping him
correspond with French-speaking constituents from his northern Maine district during the Watergate hearings.
Then:
Lagarde joined Baker & McKenzie, a large Chicago-based international law firm, in 1981. She was a director of
two of the firm’s subsidiaries in tax havens.
She was therefore in the process of getting the right qualifications for a governor of a central
bank.
As France’s trade minister between 2005 and May 2007, Lagarde (…) implemented liberal economic reforms,
such as liberalizing the labor market, lowering estate taxes, and an austerity plan for public services.
Either in order to squeeze from the taxpayer the money required to repay the loans of their
pals or in order to increase the public debt under the disguise of “austerity”. Nihil novum sub
sole.
On 17 December 2015, Michel Sapin, French Finance Minister, said that Lagarde could stay on as head of the
IMF, despite being charged with criminal negligence.
Perhaps being charged with criminal negligence is a merit for a central banker. As well as
being director of banks in tax havens. By the way, Christine was found guilty, but that
sentence does not seem to have had much importance:
On 3 August 2011, La Cour de Justice de la République, a special court in France set up to judge ministers and
public officials for alleged crimes committed while in office, ordered an investigation into Lagarde’s role in a
€403 million arbitration deal in favour of businessman Bernard Tapie when she was finance minister in 2007. On
20 March 2013, Lagarde’s apartment in Paris was raided by French police as part of the investigation. On 24
May 2013, after two days of questioning at the Court of Justice of the Republic (CJR), Lagarde was assigned the
status of “assisted witness”, meaning that she herself was not under investigation in the affair. According to a
press report from June 2013, Lagarde was described by Stéphane Richard, the CEO of France Telecom (a former
aide to Lagarde when she was finance minister), who was himself put under formal investigation in the case, as
having been fully briefed before approving the arbitration process which benefitted Bernard Tapie.
Subsequently, in August 2014 the CJR announced that it had formally approved a negligence investigation into
Lagarde’s role in the arbitration of the Tapie case. On 17 December 2015, the CJR ordered Lagarde to stand trial
before it for alleged negligence in handling the Tapie arbitration approval. In December 2016, the court found
Lagarde guilty of negligence but declined to impose either a fine or a custodial penalty.
Which is only logical. A court finds you guilty of a crime and imposes no penalty on you,
right?
Let us have a look at this Bernard Tapie who was so close to Christine:
Bernard Roger Tapie (26 January 1943-3 October 2021) was a French businessman, politician and occasional
actor, singer, and TV host. He was Minister of City Affairs in the government of Pierre Bérégovoy.
From 1993 to 2008, there was a long legal battle between Tapie and the state-owned Crédit Lyonnais bank.
Crédit Lyonnais had defrauded Tapie in 1993 and 1994 when it sold Adidas on his behalf to Robert LouisDreyfus, apparently by arranging a larger sale with Dreyfus without Tapie’s knowledge. A 600-million-franc
(90-million-euro) sum was granted in 1995 by the French justice system, and after an appeal from Crédit
Lyonnais the Appeal Court increased the sanction to 150 million Euros in 2005. This ruling was partially
dismissed in Cassation. In 2008, a special judicial panel ruled that Tapie should receive compensation of €404
million from the French Ministry of Finance, headed by Christine Lagarde. She decided not to challenge the
ruling. On 3 December 2015, a French court ruled that Tapie should return this compensation with interest. A
few days later, the Court of Justice of the Republic ordered that Lagarde should stand trial for negligence.
What negligence is not challenging a ruling? The negligence implied in the text is, rather, that
the sum owed by Christine’s ministry of finance to Tapie starts in €90 million, then it rises to
€150 million, and escalates to €404 million. Christine is not worried about the escalation and
does not question the steep rise in the sum owed by the French taxpayer to her crony: from
€90 million to €404 million, but she does not say a thing. In other words: Christine stole €404
million for her crony Bernard Tapie. She was not being negligent, but stealing from the
French taxpayer for her crony. Whether she got a share in the spoil is something I do not have
information about to decide. The point is that she kept her mouth shut when the “special
panel” ruled that the French taxpayer owed €404 million to Tapie because she wanted Tapie
to get that “compensation”.
On 19 December 2016, Lagarde was convicted of negligence; however, the conviction was not deemed a
criminal record and Lagarde was not sentenced to any punishment.
Despite having been convicted of a crime, the conviction is not deemed a criminal record. The
logic of that is beyond me. But by that time Christine had been managing director of the IMF
for five years.
On 28 June 2011, the IMF board elected Lagarde as its next managing director and chairman for a five-year
term, starting on 5 July 2011.
Which is before Christine was convicted. But:
She was selected by consensus for a second five-year term, starting 5 July 2016 [PMO: that is to say, once she
had been convicted], being the only candidate nominated for the post.
Thus, the IMF board “selects by consensus” a convicted criminal for the highest position in
the institution. What follows is from The
Guardian:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/dec/19/christine-lagarde-avoids-sentencedespite-guilty-verdict-in-negligence-trial
Christine Lagarde has been found guilty of negligence in approving a massive payout of taxpayers’ money to
controversial French businessman Bernard Tapie but avoided a jail sentence. A French court convicted the head
of the International Monetary Fund and former government minister, who had faced a €15,000 (£12,600) fine
and up to a year in prison. But it decided she should not be punished and that the conviction would not constitute
a criminal record. On Monday evening the IMF gave her its full support.
Lagarde, who has always argued she did nothing wrong and acted “in the public interest”, was not present for the
judgment. Her lawyer Patrick Maisonneuve said she had flown back to Washington DC, where the IMF is based.
Christine did not even bother to show up at her trial. She knew she was untouchable and that
what the court may say was immaterial. She is another Ursula, though, unlike Ursula, it seems
that she really has brains and that she has got a real University degree.
Within hours of the court’s decision, the IMF’s 24-member board convened a meeting to discuss Lagarde’s
future. On Monday evening the IMF’s Washington-based executive board gave Lagarde its full support.
This is worse than Ursula’ second appointment as president of the European Commission,
because Ursula did not receive a criminal conviction for concealing the terms of the contracts
that she had concluded with her cronies of Pfizer:
The General Court of the European Union ruled against the Commission’s decision to redact large parts of the
contracts before making them available.
As Christine was appointed head of the IMF in 2016, in principle she would remain in that
position until 2021. But the Phoenician Navy had other plans for her:
On 2 July 2019, Christine Lagarde was nominated by the European Council to succeed Mario Draghi as
President of the European Central Bank (ECB) on 1 November 2019. On 17 [PMO: 7+1=8] September 2019, the
European Parliament voted via secret ballot to recommend her to the position, with 394 in favour, 206 opposed,
and 49 abstentions.
The European Parliament not only accepts the proposal of the European Council of a
convicted criminal for the position of head of the ECB, but goes farther than that and
recommends her for the position. This is logical; after all, what better than a convicted
criminal/thief with experience in tax havens for head of a central bank?
Lagarde’s Jewish cousin Ursula von der Leyen admitted yesterday that European culture is
based on the Talmud, so it is all out in the open now, I guess. The masks are off.














I have heard that she was born a man.
Wouldn’t surprise me at all