The Real Winston Churchill
Sun 10:15 am +00:00, 1 Dec 2024 12HenryMakow.com – Nov 30, 2024
On the 150th anniversary of his birth in 1874, let us remember Winston Churchill, a crypto-Jew who sold out his country to advance the Rothschilds’ program of world domination.
The Masonic Jewish central bankers contrive wars for profit, to kill patriots and to degrade and enslave humanity.
Churchill described the Second World War as the “most unnecessary war in history.”
But he served bankers in the City who had made good his stock market losses and saved his beloved Chartwell from foreclosure. A manic-depressive, he thrived on the rush of war and cared little for his fellow humans.
Latest – Hollywood film tries to whitewash war criminal Winston Churchill
———– More Churchill War Crimes – If Nazis had won, would they have hung him?
(Winston Churchill, Illuminati–Originally posted in Aug. 2005)
By Henry Makow, Ph.D.
After the first Nazi air raid on London Sept. 7, 1940 which killed 306 people, Winston Churchill remarked, “They cheered me as if I’d given them victory, instead of getting their houses bombed to bits.” (416)
Churchill is telling the truth.
22 Apr 1941, Bristol, England, UK — British Prime Minister Winston Churchill (center) gestures to residents of Bristol, which came under heavy bombing by Germany. “We shall let them have it back,” Churchill told the bombing victims. Behind Churchill is American Ambassador John G. Winant. Click to enlarge
Unknown to Londoners, he had rejected Hitler’s proposal to spare civilian targets. Quite the opposite, he goaded Hitler into bombing London by hitting Berlin and other civilian targets first.
Churchill told his Air Marshall: “Never mistreat an enemy by halves” and instructed his cabinet, “bombing of military objectives, increasingly widely interpreted, seems our best road home at present.” He blocked the Red Cross from monitoring civilian casualties. (440)
Before the end of Sept. 1940, 7,000 Londoners including 700 children lay dead. By the end of the war, more than 60,000 British civilians and 650,000 German civilians died from “strategic” bombing.
In 1940, Churchill had to divert attacks from RAF airfields but he also wanted to start the bloodletting. A year had passed with little action. It was being called the “phoney war.” Hitler was making generous peace offers that prominent Englishmen wanted to accept.
If Britain had made peace, there would not have been a Jewish holocaust.
Churchill described the Second World War as the “most unnecessary war in history.” But he served bankers in the City who had made good his stock market losses and saved his beloved Chartwell from foreclosure. A manic-depressive, he thrived on the rush of war and cared little for ordinary people.
I realize this is not the saccharine history we are spoon-fed. What we term “history” is mostly propaganda, i.e. a cover-up.
My source for the above is David Irving’s Churchill’s War (Avon Books, 1987), which cuts through the sycophancy that characterizes most accounts of World War Two.
The Second World War was a big step in a long-term program to enslave humanity in a world dictatorship run by the Illuminati (London-based monopoly capital.)
The Illuminati start wars to increase their wealth and power and to control, reshape and brutalize humanity. Most politicians are flunkies, con men, traitors, and criminals, packaged and sold by (banker-owned) mass media and universities.















Stalin referred to him as ‘that drunken bum’. Most of the time he was completely out of it, but that would have been the later years when he had wrought his mischief.
I’m with Christopher Spivey and suggest that Winston Churchill and Aliester Crowley were one in the same.
Now that is an interesting idea which is new to me. Thank you, John.
Chris has done a lot of research in to the ruling class having multiple personas. I think he’s bang on the money. Here’s one of his latest articles:
https://www.christopherspivey.co.uk/2024/07/21/a-harsh-lesson-in-history
Yes he has and he points out that lots of well known persona are based on the same image source. Meaning that nothing whatsoever can be taken for granted, that all the world is a stage….
The WC Fields Churchill comparison is quite convincing too
Chris took down his main site after he exposed the Drummer Rigby Woolwich FF, which led to him being victimised by the State. It’s all on the Wayback machine though for anyone interested, he has a massive archive
That link is from his current, much diminished, site
The illegitimate son of the Prince Of Wales, grandson of Queen Victoria, who was daughter of Nathan Mayer Rothschild.
Yes Greg Hallet was pretty convincing about all that, particularly the Rothschild & Sax Coberg Gotha blending. The Prince of Wales in question being subsequently Edward VII, a total wrong un who was a big player in the creation of WW1 by the British State. See:
https://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/king-edward-vii-of-great-britain-evil-demiurge-of-the-triple-entente-and-world-war-1/
As for Churchill being Crowley then that is less convincing to me. Both had very comprehensively witnessed and documented lives. They do look very similar though and both were born in the mid 1870’s so very similar ages too. So I wouldn’t rule it out
I used to read Spivey, but don’t bother any more. I can’t post pictures now in comments but am sure he’s wrong on much of his speculation. Saying something, doesn’t make it so, but please feel free to disagree.
Hi Ian. I don’t think anyone is 100% correct on everything but all opinions and info give food for thought. You can now post pictures again. 🙂
Thanks John, and yes opinions are all valuable, as are challenging our belief systems.
and Crowley totally different shape in my opinion.
I’ve spent a while scrolling down the Spivey article and have to say that the comparisons he makes between people don’t ring my bell at all.
Perhaps he’s better at studying face shapes, but I can’t see any likenesses in most of them.