SOTN Endorses Miles Mathis’ Most Recent ‘Enlarged’ Election Analysis – Link Below
Sun 12:17 pm +00:00, 10 Nov 2024 3SOTN Editor’s Note: This Alt Media platform has not yet found the time to write “the story behind the story” that we knew was critical to understand since the next four years will unfold accordingly.
We have read Miles Mathis over the years and knew that he was a truth-seeker par excellence. His perceptive breakdown of various — and very real — conspiracies is frequently second to none.
KEY POINTS: It was clear to our stable of political analysts that Kamala Harris did NOT receive anywhere near the 70,357,216 supposedly showing up in her column. Nor did Harris win the 226 electoral votes or prevail in all of those 20 states. Clearly she lost Virginia, Maine and quite likely New Hampshire; and Mathis well explains exactly why the final election tallies are being meticulously tweaked by the hidden controllers as they are.
Now we have read and concur with and posted his election analysis and commentary. Not only will you not be disappointed, you will learn some extremely important info that will serve you well going forward.
SOTN owes Mathis a debt of gratitude for saving us the time to write a similar piece; as always, his take includes penetrating insights ours would not have had and vice versa.
State of the Nation
November 9, 2024
https://mileswmathis.com/trumpy.pdf
I posted that Mathis paper here the day after it was published. It seems to have been updated though so it is well worth another look
Yes, that is why I posted it, Pete. I was TOTALLY aware you had already posted the first iteration, but this version is greatly extended to take in most recent developments. I also found the comments about him by SOTN very interesting, and somehow thought you would as well. That is why I constructed the Headline as I did.
Thanks danceaway their comments are definitely interesting to me. I’m not sure how to take them though, I always assumed that SOTN is some sort of controlled oppo even though they are often very revealing
But I’ve no idea who they are, or who funds them, so I could well be wrong about that. So what does that say about their endorsement of Mathis? Hard to say
So I suppose that I will continue to look at both with that in the back of my mind. But will continue to judge them on their content rather than anything else, which is often spot on. I enjoy Mathis primarily because he usually finds another different angle and also because he is so astute, witty and very funny at times too