Manchester Arena Bombing. Richard D Hall in Court.

Greetings,
I have posted the following message on the website …
Richard D. Hall will be appearing at a High Court hearing at the Royal
Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL on Monday 29th January 2024,
starting at 2pm, and time allowed is 2 hours and 30 minutes. The hearing
will be heard in a court room, although which court room has not yet been
decided.
The hearing is for a summary judgment application submitted by the
Claimants – who claim they were injured in the Manchester Arena bomb
attack. Their application to the court has been made in order to attempt to
prevent all of Richard D. Hall’s evidence about the alleged bombing being
heard at a future trial. The basis of this, is that they claim that his
evidence would have no chance of success at a trial, because they claim
that the truth about the Manchester Arena bombing was already established
by a public inquiry. He will be opposing the application at the hearing, in
order to get his evidence heard. It is expected a decision will be made by
the judge at the end of the hearing. The main part of the claim is that the
opinions expressed in Richard D. Hall’s book and films about the Manchester
Arena incident amount to a harassment of them, and they are seeking damages
of �50,000 and an injunction against his published work.
If anyone wants to attend, there are seats, but limited to a certain
number, and they are allocated on a first come basis. Please dress well if
you are coming to support, please do not speak in the court room and do not
try to record the hearing.
Thanks
Richard

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

4 Responses to “Manchester Arena Bombing. Richard D Hall in Court.”

  1. pete fairhurst 2 says:

    The usual fit up by the usual crew. I fear for Rich’s financial health. Top man Rich he deserves our help. You can easily chip in on his website if you want

    He’s been targeted by the spooks now and they can play this to suit their agenda. See Marianna Spring of the appalling BBC. Clearly on the spook payroll, a disgusting creature who was the first to target him at his stall in Merthyr

    We already know that they can suborn our justice system for their own purposes whenever they choose. Plenty of examples of that. Remember Drummer Rigby of Woolwich? An invented character leading to an invented case in the High Court. But treated as real by all media. Plenty of others too

  2. NPP says:

    Richard D. Hall, whether you’re right or wrong, you should not be in court on account of your opinion. Best wishes with Richard.

    I remember Richard going on a lost cause looking for the long lost member of The Manic Street Preachers. It was all a bit of a damp squid in the end, but he followed his nose. Good for him.

    Bloody BBC Verify Falsify Marijuanna Spring.

  3. Belyi says:

    Like Sandy Hook but on a smaller scale.

    What it comes down to in the end is money and lots of it. First the crisis actors get paid a decent sum to play their part and then, when someone puts proper facts forward, they shout for more money to stop the truth from coming out.