The lady tells who is behind the mass immigration.
Sun 6:24 pm +01:00, 20 Aug 2023 5https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ERmOpZrKtw
Welcome to the Tap Blog - The Home for Media Sceptics
The blog that’s fed by the readers. Please send in the news and stories that you think are of interest to an awakened audience. Read more...
Back to Top
www.ecommerce-help.co.uk
www.ecommerce-help.co.uk/wordpress-services
www.alternativeview.co.uk
https://thelawoffrequencies.com
Rife and The Law of Frequencies video presentation
Atom Feed
Search The Tap
Tap Newsletter
UK Events 2024
The Magical Landscapes of these Sacred Islands Unleashed
The Assembly Rooms, High Street, Glastonbury
Sunday 20th October 2024
Join us in Glastonbury for The Alternative View Presents Thomas Sheridan with special guest Maria Wheatley
The Assembly Rooms Glastonbury
Latest Comments
- on The Bizarre Trial of Richard D. Hall – Part 1
- on Why the UK’s illegal migration crisis is about to get a LOT worse
- on Spirit Hills of London.
- on Khazarian Mafia: The God Eaters Part 1
- on Spirit Hills of London.
- on Perpetual Blitzkrieg to Break Your Spirit. – David Icke Dot Connector video; Free portion; link below
- on Why the UK’s illegal migration crisis is about to get a LOT worse
Links and Ads
To help keep The Tap free please visit our advertisers and sponsors.
USE CODE TAP20 FOR A 20% DISCOUNT
Ecommerce-Help
Specialists in Ecommerce and Shopping Cart systems. We also offer WordPress setup, development, fixing and support.www.ecommerce-help.co.uk
www.ecommerce-help.co.uk/wordpress-services
Alternative View Media
The guys who run The Tap and The Alternative View Conference. Please check them out.
www.alternativeview.co.uk
https://thelawoffrequencies.comRife and The Law of Frequencies video presentation
I would add …
UN migration chief Peter Sutherland has said that the EU should do its best to undermine the homogeneity of its Member States by encouraging more migration and greater multiculturalism.
His view is that migration into the EU has made for ‘dynamism and economic growth’, although this is sometimes ‘difficult to explain to people’. Member States should be more ‘open’.
1. Is the Commission aware of the report entitled ‘EU should “undermine national homogeneity” says UN migration chief’[1]?
2. Does the Commission agree or disagree with Peter Sutherland, and why?
3. Does the Commission agree that as a matter of principle Peter Sutherland has no business interfering in the migration policies of sovereign countries? Will the Commission therefore distance itself from his remarks? If not, why not?
4. Does the Commission agree that, in the context of the European Union, ‘undermining national homogeneity’, as advocated by Peter Sutherland, is at odds with
—the fourth subparagraph of Article 3 (3) of the Treaty on European Union, which reads as follows: ‘[The Union] shall respect its rich cultural and linguistic diversity, and shall ensure that Europe’s cultural heritage is safeguarded and enhanced’, and —the first sentence of Article 4 (2) of the Treaty on European Union, which reads as follows: ‘The Union shall respect the equality of Member States before the Treaties as well as their national identities, inherent in their fundamental structures, political and constitutional, inclusive of regional and local self-government’,
in that such an approach poses a threat to the culture and national identity of individual Member States? If so, is the Commission prepared to state that Peter Sutherland’s remarks are not consistent with the ideas underpinning the European Union? If not, how would the Commission seek to defend Peter Sutherland’s remarks in the light of the Treaty articles referred to above?
[1] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-18519395
Ooops forgot the link
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-7-2012-007854_EN.html
By Brian Wheeler
Political reporter, BBC News
The EU should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, the UN’s special representative for migration has said.
Peter Sutherland told peers the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.
He also suggested the UK government’s immigration policy had no basis in international law.
He was being quizzed by the Lords EU home affairs sub-committee which is investigating global migration.
Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development , which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.
He told the House of Lords committee migration was a “crucial dynamic for economic growth” in some EU nations “however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states”.
‘More open’
An ageing or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the “key argument and, I hesitate to the use word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states”, he added.
“It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated.”
The UN special representative on migration was also quizzed about what the EU should do about evidence from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) that employment rates among migrants were higher in the US and Australia than EU countries.
He told the committee: “The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.
“And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.”
Mr Sutherland recently argued, in a lecture to the London School of Economics, of which he is chairman, that there was a “shift from states selecting migrants to migrants selecting states” and the EU’s ability to compete at a “global level” was at risk.
‘No justification’
In evidence to the Lords committee, he urged EU member states to work together more closely on migration policy and advocated a global approach to the issue – criticising the UK government’s attempt to cut net migration from its current level to “tens of thousands” a year through visa restrictions.
British higher education chiefs want non-EU overseas students to be exempted from migration statistics and say visa restrictions brought in to help the government meet its target will damage Britain’s economic competitiveness.
But immigration minister Damian Green has said exempting foreign students would amount to “fiddling” the figures and the current method of counting was approved by the UN.
Committee chairman Lord Hannay, a crossbench peer and a former British ambassador to the UN, said Mr Green’s claim of UN backing for including students in migration figures “frankly doesn’t hold water – this is not a piece of international law”.
Mr Sutherland, a former Attorney General of Ireland, agreed, saying: “Absolutely not. it provides absolutely no justification at all for the position they are talking about.”
‘UK support’
He said the policy risked Britain’s traditional status as “tolerant, open society” and would be “massively damaging” to its higher education sector both financially and intellectually.
“It’s very important that we should not send a signal from this country, either to potential students of the highest quality, or to academic staff, that this is in some way an unsympathetic environment in which to seek visas or whatever other permissions are required… and I would be fearful that that could be a signal.”
Mr Sutherland, who has attended meetings of The Bilderberg Group , a top level international networking organisation often criticised for its alleged secrecy, called on EU states to stop targeting “highly skilled” migrants, arguing that “at the most basic level individuals should have a freedom of choice” about whether to come and study or work in another country.
Mr Sutherland also briefed the peers on plans for the Global Migration and Development Forum’s next annual conference in Mauritius in November, adding: “The UK has been very constructively engaged in this whole process from the beginning and very supportive of me personally.”
Asked afterwards how much the UK had contributed to the forum’s running costs in the six years it had been in existence, he said it was a relatively small sum in the region of “tens of thousands”.
Why has one of our nation’s rather obvious enemies been granted a KCMG ?
The Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George
British knighthood
The Most Distinguished Order of Saint Michael and Saint George, British order of knighthood founded in 1818 by the Prince Regent, later King George IV, to commemorate the British protectorate over the Ionian islands (now in Greece) and Malta, which came under British rule in 1814.
Originally membership was exclusively for inhabitants of the Ionian islands and Malta, as well as for British citizens who had performed important government services in the Mediterranean area. Since 1879 any citizen of the United Kingdom has been eligible; however, the honour is conferred mostly on officials in colonial affairs, foreign-service officers and diplomats, and others who have performed important duties in Commonwealth countries. Foreigners may be admitted as honorary members.
Link, Ian?