The Anus Is The New Uterus?

This is a revolting, tasteless, crude and lude illustration. Sadly and incredibly, it reflects ideas being stated as factual in today’s collective West.

Whatever floats yer boat, as I recall friend used to say. I might add, so long as its consensual. I saw a clip from GB News, the channel for racists, bigots and the right-wing generally, apparently, whereby a grown woman was adamant that times have moved on and, of course, men can have babies. At least GB News are having the debate I suppose. I assume, as with climate change, the BBC deem the science a done deal and, of course men have babies.

Is the theory that a female has a flesh phallic attachment, yet still carries a child within her womb? That still doesn’t make her a man though. Or does a male have an artificial womb surgically attached? I don’t know. I’m not really interested. In my world, men do not have babies.

Historian David Starkey was having none of it and could hardly believe such a debate was being taken seriously. I always enjoyed Starkey’s forthright comments, but was very disappointed when he too advocated the covid1984 jab. No matter how bright and educated, when ever anyone advocates the jab, I presume stupidity or pressure and cowardice have taken hold. Dr. David Starkey, who although presumably treats the anus as a sex organ, at least understands the birds and the bees and that babies do not conceive of the bottom. Here’s a Starkey I made earlier…

There is something much darker going on. Is it preferable that a child has a male and female parent? I would say unequivocally yes. If a man or woman wants to share their life with another of same sex, fine, but you must accept nature: to have a child, as ying to yang, positive to negative, it requires conception between male and female organs. Should an orphan in particular circumstances be brought up successfully by a same sex couple, it would be welcome as opposed to the child having no home, I guess. But, surely the most rounded environment for a child is the conventional family unit as it has been ever since ever. I understand there can be an unhealthy environment with conventional male-female parents and abuse and exploitation happens, but in a healthy environment with safe and loving parents, surely a male-female parental unit is preferable, isn’t it? Or am I just old fashioned and out of touch?

Riley Gaines is the swimmer who was forced to compete against the pretend female Lia Thomas who was apparently pretending to no longer have a John Thomas; but does? I had assumed he’d had it removed. I get confused; so a man can literally still be intact and still identify as an authentic female? It is ludicrous. Riley comments on a man pretending to be a woman breast feeding a baby. This is the same man ITV news included during a piece about the impact of soaring water bills on an everyday ‘mother’.

I particularly took note because that same pretend woman was referenced in a previous TAP Blog post:
https://tapnewswire.com/2023/07/i-am-a-flying-lady-pig-oink-oink/

I believe Justin Welby, the pretend Christian Archbishop advocating open borders and unlimited mass immigration, espouses trans-gender clergy. This must be at odds with the teachings of Jesus, mustn’t it? At what point will congregations refuse to tolerate this cultural Marxist nonsense? I repeat President Putin’s quote where he repeats, “Anyone who dares mention that men and women actually exist, which is a biological fact, risk being ostracised. “Parent number one” and “parent number two,” “’birthing parent” instead of “mother,” and “human milk” replacing “breastmilk” because it might upset the people who are unsure about their own gender. I repeat, this is nothing new; in the 1920s, the so-called Soviet Kulturtraegers also invented some newspeak believing they were creating a new consciousness and changing values that way. And, as I have already said, they made such a mess it still makes one shudder at times.”

Men do not have uteruses and they do not have babies. Oh sure, by the time some mad scientists have experimented creating chimera hybrids, no doubt they will claim a ‘man’ is able to become pregnant.
Random article:
The news that researchers want to create human-animal chimeras has generated controversy recently, and may conjure up ideas about Frankenstein-ish experiments. But chimeras aren’t always man-made—and there are a number of examples of human chimeras that already exist…. but, I don’t really want to know.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/3-human-chimeras-that-already-exist/

I recall an image of a human-sheep-like creature with little ones sucking. It was an image from exploring the subject of UFOs and supposedly of a real creature within a deep underground base laboratory or some such scenario. I assume it was a constructed image. I found it uncomfortable to look at. If they have already been doing such things in DUMBs, so I am to be shocked and saddened. But, it still would not constitute an authentic natural human. No doubt the gay WEF member – would that be a male member, female or somewhere in between – Prof. Yuval Noah Harari fantasises over babies in pods without all that messy sexual intercourse stuff. Oh yes, such a rounded character, ideal for teaching and nurturing young minds:
https://en.history.huji.ac.il/people/yuval-noah-harari

I saw imagery of Slick Willy Clinton meeting Pope Francis with George Soros Jr. in attendance. I wonder if Slick Willy has any inclination toward men pretending to be women? I dare say some suggest Hillary is comparable. Then there is Barak and Michael and it has even been suggested to me that Trump is really a woman. That would really blow my mind. I wonder if Slick Willy offered any advise for post-rape victims, such as, ‘better put some ice on that’?
https://juanitabroaddrick.com/
These creatures are of a Frankenstein realm. But, as ex-footballer Matt Le Tissier says, calmly with a good humour across his face, good will out and the light will overcome the dark.

Still, despite all the books he’s written, my favourite Dr. E. Michael Jones quotes remains, ‘The anus is not a sex organ.’
https://tv.gab.com/watch?v=60494e35d875202e42eeb3c5

Strange days. Strange days indeed.

 

Previous:
https://tapnewswire.com/2023/07/lord-grafton-grows-solar-panels/

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

2 Responses to “The Anus Is The New Uterus?”

  1. ian says:

    the Starkey painting is exceptional Ned. As for all the men can have babies stuff, well, wot a load of crap.

  2. NPP says:

    I’d wrapped & packed away the Starkey portrait after he backed the jab. I was surprised & disappointed in him.