Search the Tap
Latest Posts
- Barclays Bank boss in Epstein files 16 February 2026
- Epstein’s autopsy throws doubt on whether it was really Epstein’s body 16 February 2026
- Death Analyst works over Epstein’s death, and finds inconsistencies 15 February 2026
- Amazon’s Ring And Google’s Nest Unwittingly Reveal The Severity Of The U.S. Surveillance State 15 February 2026
- My New Lesbian Haircut – Thomas Sheridan 15 February 2026
- A survivor overcomes the trauma of her experiences. 14 February 2026
- The three camps of awareness 14 February 2026
- New Evidence Shows they Secretly EXTRACTED Epstein from MCC in Black Van 14 February 2026
- WIll the Epsteinized West lose power now their murderous ways are becoming generally known? 14 February 2026
- From the American Dream to the American Nightmare – Zionism in the US 14 February 2026
Support the Tap
Newsletter
Ads and Supporters
About the Tap
Latest Comments
- on Death Analyst works over Epstein’s death, and finds inconsistencies
- on Epstein, Obviously, Was A Russian Asset.
- on Did Andrew commit murder? The accusations of murder are being hidden by mainstream media.
- on Did Andrew commit murder? The accusations of murder are being hidden by mainstream media.
- on Epstein, Obviously, Was A Russian Asset.
- on London’s blind panic
- on Epstein, Obviously, Was A Russian Asset.













The government is trying to avoid a discussion of the proposed WHO pandemic treaty in Parliament. They’d prefer the chance to rig a referendum, I guess, instead of facing a proper debate.
I would not be surprised Tap.
They also want to avoid taking responsibility and avoid the repercussions. First off campaign for a debate to be held in Parliament so MPs can show if they are cullers or killers.
Yes a great point Tap, I hadn’t thought of that angle. Quite clever really, though they never lacked cunning.