5 Responses to “Who was targeted in the Ohio mass pollution incident?”

  1. ian says:

    Perhaps, pete’s Miles Mathis quote was correct then, and it is fake. It would make perfect sense.

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      One can never be sure Ian but his article made sense to me. He found too many anomalies. Its hard to believe that the Feds wouldn’t intervene if it was really as toxic as they say. The subsequent lawsuits would be thick on the ground

      • ian says:

        I agree pete, and try my best not to cut my nose off to spite my face. Just because I didn’t agree on some things, doesn’t necessarily mean I disagree with him on everything. The fact that you and Tap like him is an excellent reference too.

      • pete fairhurst 2 says:

        I know exactly what you mean Ian. It’s all a question of personal judgement isn’t it. Nothing is ever certain nowadays

        He is probably not what he claims he is, he’s almost too good to be true. But I like his writing style, his different perspective and his sense of humour. He always makes me think too

        And the range of his stuff is mind boggling, the science work especially so