Tap News
Tap News Log in Register ☰

People believe what they want to believe, esp if they read the NYT

 Thu 11:42 am Europe/London, 23 Feb 2023  
posted by danceaway

eugyppius: a plague chronicle

New York Times readers confront the manifest failure of masks to do anything, cope and seethe

What remains of Team Mask is a bunch of deeply irrational people, and there is no reasoning with them.

eugyppius
20 hr ago
625
495

Yesterday, opinion columnist Bret Stephens broke some uncomfortable news to New York Times readers, in a blunt piece headlined The Mask Mandates Did Nothing. Will Any Lessons Be Learned? He went on to explain that the massive Cochrane literature review on Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses (which the rest of us covered weeks ago) failed to find any evidence that making people wear cloth or plastic on their faces does anything about rates of Covid or influenza infection.

There’s no point in talking about what he has to say; you’ve heard it all before. Let’s look instead at his commentariat, to see how the Faucian faithful are taking the news.

eugyppius: a plague chronicle is a reader-supported publication. maybe you subscribe?

The highest-rated comment is by Stephen Levin. He’s had a look at the fine print and decided to take solace in the uncertainty of the authors – to the applause of nearly three thousand people:

John Bertuso, as a physician, has the same idea:

The prior, default position of these men – and, judging from the comments, easily 75% of everyone else who reads the Times – is that masks work, and any uncertainty in the studies is simply a failure to establish what they’re already certain of, namely that masks work. Twisted very far, uncertainty can even become a confirmation that masks are actually working, because at least it’s not evidence that they’re not working!

This is fairly crazy when you think about it. Not only do we lack studies showing that masks don’t work; we also have no studies showing that rain dances don’t work, and that sacrificing young goats to Hermes doesn’t work, and that hieromancy doesn’t work. In fact there’s no limit to the insane stuff you’ll end up doing if you assume everything works in the absence of proof that it doesn’t.

Michelle, who wants us all to know that she’s read the study, exemplifies the other major cope. This is that masks totally work, it’s just that their use requires such levels of care and consistency that – practically speaking – most people derive no measurable benefit from them.

It’s unclear how this line of argument saves masks, really, but that’s beside the point. It makes people like Michelle feel better about their heavy investment in one of the more absurd superstitions to afflict Western society in recent memory.

Beyond the Michelles and the Steven Levins and the Chrissies – people who are at least superficially concerned to appear reasonable – there’s a vast ocean of lunatics like BChad, whose raging confidence in masking has grown so enormous, it is beyond the power of any empirical evidence whatsoever to strike down.

Masks cover up nasal passages, and nasal passages are how the virus spreads, and BChad was in a hospital today, and everyone was masking in the hospital BChad was in, and that’s science. “Common sense prevails here,” and over 1600 Times readers agree.

A big part of the irrational appeal of masks, is their prior association with hospitals and similar self-consciously hygienic environments. This is enough to put the efficacy of masking beyond all question for readers like Steve:

Plenty of commenters claiming to be medical personnel agree, raising the strong possibility that even many nurses and surgeons don’t understand why they wear masks in the operating theatre.

But in this whole sea of writhing ignorance, which goes on for over a thousand comments, it’s statements from people like August West that really stand out for me.

Ninety-six upvotes for the tinpot totalitarianism of this loser, who believes himself entitled to order other people around on the basis of unfounded beliefs, then to claim ignorance as an excuse for his excesses, and nevertheless to condemn those who objected to his superstitious demands of selfishness.

Humans are fundamentally irrational, which is why a primary argument of the plague chronicle is that there can be no such thing as temporary measures to crush a curve, or deviations from routine to save a grandparent, or hyperbolic hygiene propaganda just to get through the winter. All this stuff, every time you try it, will warp the perceptions and opinions of millions of people forever. In 2055, we’ll be awakening from our second nuclear winter and some elderly eccentrics leftover from the 2020 pandemic will still be masking in the breadlines every morning.

UPDATE (h/t @M_Vronsky): This Twitter user asked a local government official for a response to the op-ed and received this totally insane reply, concluding: “You were right statistically, but I won’t apologize.”

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/new-york-times-readers-confront-the?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

 

 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Back to Top

The Tap Blog

The blog that's fed by you, the readers. Please send in the news and stories that you think are of interest using the form below.

Help Support The Tap

If you enjoy the Tap Blog then please help support the hosting costs and site upgrades. Your contributions whatever the amount will help keep this valuable and much loved resource online now and into the future. Thank You!

Under New Management

Get the Full Story

Search The Tap

Tap Archives

Recent Posts

  • from “Edomites and the British Empire” 1935
  • The digital ruble is no different to other CBDCs
  • Murdering children is the daily business of NATO
  • Julian Rose – Disbelief as “Green King Charles” Gives Royal Assent to New Gene Breeding Technology
  • Who is Humza Yousef. asks Katie Hopkins.
  • Drone swarms the next unmanned warfare system to be tested in Ukraine
  • Basic B.R.I.C.S. Economics

The Alternative View 12

AV12 presentation recordings are now available to watch online. www.alternativeview.co.uk

The AV13 one day live gathering conference is coming in October 2023. Speakers and ticket info coming soon.

Sharing

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

Recent Comments

  • Chris x on Katie Hopkins – Who is Humza Yousaf?
  • newensign on Julian Rose – Disbelief as “Green King Charles” Gives Royal Assent to New Gene Breeding Technology
  • Tapestry on Julian Rose – Disbelief as “Green King Charles” Gives Royal Assent to New Gene Breeding Technology
  • ian on Katie Hopkins – Who is Humza Yousaf?
  • NPP on Katie Hopkins – Who is Humza Yousaf?
  • Gordon on Katie Hopkins – Who is Humza Yousaf?
  • ian on Who is Humza Yousef. asks Katie Hopkins.

SUBMIT NEWS

Please complete the required fields.
Please select your image(s) to upload.
Add another image

Reset form

Atom Feed

This site is intended as an informational guide. The remedies approaches and techniques described hearin are meant to supplement, and not be a substitute for, professional, medical care or treatments. Any information is for entertainment purposes only.

Any previous articles which prefix the 8th of February 2023 have no involvement in new upload to this site. Any Copy right infringements are not intended and any such should be made aware to the site for immediate withdraw.

Articles posted here are for your consideration at your discretion. No purported facts have been verified. Articles do not necessarily reflect the views of the poster nor the site owner.

Blog editor - tap[at]alternativeview.co.uk

Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
Support Us

If you enjoy the Tap Blog then please help support the site hosting and development costs. Your contributions will help keep this valuable and much loved resource online now and into the future. Every pound, dollar or euro is much appreciated. Thank You!