The Tap Blog - The Home for Media Sceptics

The blog that’s fed by the readers. Please send in the news and stories that you think are of interest to an awakened audience. Read more...

Hosting Upgrade Appeal

Dear Visitor. The Tap has become increasingly busy over the last few weeks with many more visitors and sign ups. It's currently creaking and slowing. We need a hosting account upgrade to help cope with the increased activity and keep this free blog online. In this age of great change The Tap is a valuable independent resource where we can come together and share information the controlling parasites would rather we didn't have. It would be sad to lose it but it costs to keep it going and free to use. If any of you can help donate even a small amount towards the hosting upgrade that would be a big help. Your small donation makes a huge difference. Thank you in advance. Click here to donate

6 Responses to “NASA Warfare Document plan to kill mankind population control”

  1. 23 Apr 2022 10:17
    Tapestry says:

    Beam weapons increasingly prevalent – on page 45. Even the Moskva could have been hit with a beam. The Russians have never admitted missiles hit the ship, so what did?

    • 23 Apr 2022 10:29
      Weaver says:

      There is a pdf link:
      https://www.metabunk.org/attachments/futurewarfare-pdf.3296/

      • 23 Apr 2022 15:26
        pete fairhurst says:

        These people are stark, staring, mad. Their nonchalant arrogance is utterly breathtaking. They will inevitably self destruct at some point because they think that they can be god. And that is impossible for any human

        My worry would be that they take a lot of the rest of us with them when their hubris meets it’s inevitable nemesis

        Do we have any real evidence that beam weapons are anything other than science fiction? I’m not suggesting that beams don’t exist, I simply don’t know. But I would like to see some tangible empirical evidence for their existence before I accept that they are real kinetic weapons. Is there even any circumstantial evidence?

      • 23 Apr 2022 15:28
        pete fairhurst says:

        Should have made it clear that I was referring to your metabunk link Weaver, not the vid at the top

  2. 24 Apr 2022 09:13
    Weaver says:

    I do not know what is worse Pete the arrogance of these people or the ignorance of the people who accept all of this.

    • 24 Apr 2022 11:29
      ian says:

      Good point Weaver. The fact that it is wilful ignorance makes it worse. Behaving socially or rather herd compliant , is far more important some than it is to others, look no further than the Ache conformity experiments for that. Gossiping in their festering cesspools of social acceptability, seems to give them a comfort blanket of reassurance. At least the arrogant b4stards are openly arrogant and readable.