Family of British risk analyst, 31, who was killed in the 9/11 terror attacks demand new inquest to hear ‘significant evidence’ about debunked ‘internal explosion’ conspiracy theory. Courtesy of emm jay

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9928641/Family-Brit-killed-9-11-terror-attacks-demand-new-inquest.html

 

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER
Get the latest Tap posts emailed to you daily

21 Responses to “Family of British risk analyst, 31, who was killed in the 9/11 terror attacks demand new inquest to hear ‘significant evidence’ about debunked ‘internal explosion’ conspiracy theory. Courtesy of emm jay”

  1. ian says:

    The Mail article keeps insisting it has been debunked by experts, but if Covid has taught us anything, it has taught us how unreliable and easily bought, expert opinion is. The BBC announced the collapse of building 7, twenty minutes before it collapsed. Now, given that in history, no steel framed building had ever collapsed due to fire, that was quite a feet.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0HPqd8dPeE&t=166s

    7/7 as well, look at this.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKvkhe3rqtc

  2. ian says:

    And as for Politicians, Mark Twain, summed it up rather well, when he said,”Politicians are like diapers, they should be changed often, and for the same reason”.

  3. Mick says:

    It was always clear that on the day of 9/11, just after rush hour on a Tuesday morning Eastern Seaboard Time, none of the 8 million or so residents or workers in Washington DC saw an airliner fly so low they could have thrown a can of coke and hit it. How come they deaf and blind?

  4. Occams says:

    “How stupid do they think we are?”

    uhhhhhhhh…..you really want an answer?

    They got away with it, didn’t they? They got a 20 year war out of it, didn’t they?

    • ian says:

      Yes they unfortunately did Occams, and many other crimes, Kennedy assassination, faking the moon landings, murders, false flag attacks world wide. They know the power of TV to decide the truth. The image above, was a poor choice on my part. On the whole, were dumb as a box of rocks.

      • Occams says:

        lol….No worries – we’re on the same page and ‘we’ know, but just as sadly, ‘we’ know how few of us there are. Look at covid? Amerika still pretty much asleep.

        Talked to a Romanian immigrant – a math professor at a US Campus. While he and his wife 100% believe (and are vaxxed) they have NO CLUE Romanians stood against this and stopped it, no clue that sooooooooo many are standing against the tide.

        But in Amerika? Most everyone around me still believes all this is real

  5. NPP says:

    It was a plane. There were only 5 stills because that camera was designed to monitor cars & people in a car park, not a fast moving jet. Obsessing about a missile disregards the evidence connected to the people on that plane.

    It WAS an inside job, but cease the obsession with holograms, no planes & energy weapons.

    Still, the best analysis of ‘9/11 for grown ups’…
    https://www.ancreport.com/911-truth-for-grown-ups/

    https://dancingisraelis.com/

    • stevie k says:

      How do you know there were any people on the plane?? No novice pilot could have carried out the manoeuvre attributed to that plane, A 270 degree descending spiral turn to end flying level for the last few hundred yards at only a few metres altitude??? This was beyond the capabilities of experienced commercial and combat pilots.
      They couldn’t afford to screw it up as they wanted the destruction of all the evidence in the accountants offices concerning the “missing” 2.3 Trillion dollars announced the day before by Donald Rumsfeld hence the more than likely use of a missile.
      And DR Judy Wood’s book on The Twin Towers collapse still to me offers the best explanation as to what happened. it answers many questions no other theory does. Look at the photos of steel beams turning to dust and blowing away… How does the Thermite theory explain this?

  6. ian says:

    The arguments will never stop over what happened.

    • Occams says:

      Focus on the ‘who’ – not the ‘how’.

      And why ‘Cui bono?’ was never asked. The answer would be far too revealing

      • stevie k says:

        Let’s see who did benefit?
        The MIC with massive expansion and profits, Dictatorial Govt through the loss of our freedoms and increase in their powers, Zionist Israel through the destruction of any strong foes.
        Blimey you don’t think any of them had anything to do with it, do you???

      • ian says:

        Now you’re talking. It worked out really well, for certain interests, and again TV controlled the narrative. It was almost as if lucky Larry knew it was coming, lucky guy. The BBC announced the collapse of building 7 twenty minutes before it fell, now that is exceptional journalism for you.

  7. stevie k says:

    Remarkable Institution the BBC… we’re so lucky to have them. They can even tell us when a new “wave” of Corona Virus is going to come, they must be really clever people.

  8. emm jay says:

    Article from Global Research today:

    “The announced discovery of thermate in the WTC dust should have been headline news nation-wide. Yet, there was no mention of it in the New York Times or Washington Post. And the rest of the US media followed their silent “lead.”

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/twenty-years-later-911-attorneys-press-full-disclosure-court/5754560