Batting hard for Batley byelection July 1st.

I am writing to appeal for help if you are able to give to Theresa Hirst’s By-election campaign in the Batley & Spen Parliamentary Constituency.  The vote takes place on the 1st July.

Therese and her team are organising the following campaigning events.  If you can help please email me at so that I can put you in contact with her team.

  1. Date: Saturday and Sunday 26th and 27th June around 11:00am to 16:00pm
  2. We need help in setting up stalls
  3. Paste board tables
  4. Balloons and table cloths to decorate
  5. Give out leaflets and our newspapers to passers-by
  6. Go out leaflet dropping door-to-hour and to local businesses.
  7. As Cleckheaton is a good place to campaign handing out leaflets etc. We could do with help leafleting it.

Supporters will be given an English Democrats’ rosette to wear whilst helping campaign so that the public can recognise us (and to keep afterwards if you want!).

Therese Hirst is also asking for any help with leafleting for the period of the week of the election leading up to the election day on 1st July.

If you are unable to attend Henry, please consider helping with the election campaign by making a small donation here.

Thank you!

Yours sincerely

Robin Tilbrook

Party Chairman


6 Responses to “Batting hard for Batley byelection July 1st.”

  1. Aldous says:

    Well the fat lady hasn’t sung yet with George Galloway’s threat to challenge the dubious result.
    All but the LabCon and Galloway’s Workers Party lost their deposits with Thérèse Hirst/English Democrats coming in sixth place – out of a total of 16 candidates. Of those who lost their deposits, only the LibDems’ Tom Gordon managed to get more than 1000 votes with1,254 and 3.3% of the Turnout.
    Victories(sic) don’t come any more hollow than this with Labour’s Kim Leadbeater scraping in with a mere 323 majority – if the morning after count was honest. A very big IF indeed.

  2. Tapestry says:

    If they can rig a US Presidential election. rigging a UK byelection is a stroll in the park.

  3. Aldous says:

    Galloway was stitched up for sure but is the 323 ‘majority’ significant? 3 being the number of Satanic Magick itself?
    The number 2 is represented as ll (in Roman Numerals) which is the number 11 as we usually know and understand it.

    “Arch-Satanist Alistair Crowley said that 11 was “the number of magick itself.”
    i.e. The number of Satanic magic.
    He defined magick as, “the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will.”
    The ‘perfect’ number is 3.
    The number of ‘perfect magick’ 3 x 11 = 33.”

    Thérèse Hirst’s count of 207 is absurdly low and quite unbelievable to be honest. Then again, 2+0+7= “the number of magick itself.”

  4. Aldous says:

    The 323 majority is NO accident or coincidence.
    3×2=6 and 2+3=5 adds up to 11 the last time I looked – “the number of magick itself”.
    We’re dealing with some really bad guys who worship this kind of stuff.

  5. Aldous says:

    Are the rejected ’83’ ballots an even further clue? 8+3=11.

  6. Aldous says:

    2+0+7=11 was meant to be a joke (Orwell’s 2+2=5) but I think it may have fell on deaf ears. Then again, 0=2 jabs (no risk = 2 kill shots) in our Covidhoax Brave New World.