Is China a melting pot? Is India a melting pot? Is Nigeria a melting pot? Is Indonesia a melting pot? Not really
Wed 10:23 am +00:00, 28 Oct 2026
Source, page 3 here: https://mileswmathis.com/notre.pdf
It goes like this: Is China a melting pot? Is India a melting pot? Is Nigeria a melting pot? Is Indonesia
a melting pot? Not really. Yes, those places show a lot of local variation, with different tribes and
dialects and so on, but they are not melting pots in the way the US or Europe have become melting
pots. China is not experiencing a huge influx of whites or blacks or Hispanics. Neither is India. India
is not experiencing a huge influx of Chinese or Russians or Hispanics. Nigeria is not experiencing a
huge influx of Asians or whites or Hispanics. There has been some increased stirring worldwide in the
past two centuries, but nothing like we are seeing in the US and Europe now. So the question is, why
have the US and Europe been targeted like nowhere else in the past 50 years? This has happened in
one lifetime, so it has to look very strange.
You will say they haven’t been targeted by nefarious overlords, as I imply, they have only been targeted
by stressed foreign populations, drawn to the wealth of the US and Europe. But although the second
part is obviously true, it has always been true. These people were always drawn to the richer nations,
as you would expect, but in the past they were mostly kept out. The US gladly took some, since we
needed the people, but Europe already had high populations and didn’t really need them. Both the US
and Europe now have high populations and don’t need more people, especially not poor people. So
why are they letting in more and more, if it isn’t a purposeful replacement? Given that whites are being
replaced, you can’t blame us for thinking we are being replaced, can you? Given that the middle class
is being replaced by the lower class, or pushed down into it, you can’t blame us for thinking it is
happening, can you? We would have to be stupid to believe otherwise.
That doesn’t imply whites are better, it just implies we aren’t any worse. We have a right to our places
like anyone else does. Just like China doesn’t want its culture replaced by whites or blacks or Indians
or anyone else, and India wants to keep its traditions, Europeans naturally want to keep theirs. The
Germans and French have been fighting to keep their traditions for centuries, to make sure Germany
didn’t become French and France didn’t become German and so on, so you can’t really blame them for
not wanting to lose their traditions to Somalia or Pakistan or anywhere else. The French and Germans
were both white, probably indistinguishable to Somalis to Pakistanis, so their pride wasn’t originally
about being white, it was about protecting their local identity and traditions, which were
understandably important to them. Traditions that couldn’t survive in a boiling melting pot.
There is also this to think about: a large portion of the European economies is tourism. What is this
tourism based on? It is based on local white European tradition: local art, customs, architecture, and
music. Tourists—even white American tourists like me—go to Germany to see people being German,
drinking their German beers in their German architecture surrounded by their German art and music
and so on. Japanese and Russian tourists go to Italy to see Italian art and architecture and history.
They don’t go to Rome see the Colosseum torn down and replaced by a melting-pot bazaar of
multicultures. They go to England to see English museums and churches and hedgerows and old stone
fences and castles. They don’t go to see Arabs and Moroccans. If they want to see Arabs and
Moroccans they go to Arabia or Morocco. My point being not that there shouldn’t be any Arabs or
Africans in Europe, but that if current trends continue, with White culture being denigrated and
decimated, with churches torn or burned down, and museums no doubt next, the entire tourist trade in
Europe will be destroyed, and with it a sizable portion of their economies.
The other side will again say, so what? Destroy the past. Life is for the living. European history is a
history of empire and oppression and nobody cares anymore if it dies.
But that doesn’t explain the tourism, does it? If nobody cares and European civilization deserves the
trash heap, why is Europe the tourist destination of the world? Those millions of tourists from all over
the world apparently do care about that culture, otherwise they would not spend all that time and
money going to experience it. And we must assume they care because—despite the politics or
economies that created it—it is beautiful. So if the Europeans, of whatever color or background, were
smart, they would protect those traditions and those monuments and that architecture and that art and
that history and that culture as their greatest possession. They would do all they could to keep it just as it was.
Which requires a brief pause. As I write about this, I keep thinking of Notre Dame. You might say the
Parisians do value it, since they just spent millions rebuilding it. Yes, but unfortunately those in charge
used it as an excuse to update it and overclean it, which was a mistake. It may have even been burned
on purpose, to allow for that.* Those old churches should never be updated, since we don’t want them
to be up-to-date. We love them for being beautifully outdated. See Chartres Cathedral, as perhaps the
greatest surviving example of dark and dirt. Notre Dame should only have been returned as much as
possible to its prior state, or the damage used as an excuse to return it to an even more beautiful former
state, jettisoning all modern modifications. That is the opposite of what was done. The shiny new
Notre Dame is a travesty to all artistic eyes.** Tourists coming to Paris want to see the old Notre
Dame, not this new monstrosity. Anyone with taste must be disappointed. So it is actually bad for
tourism.
Note the glitzy fake chandeliers, instead of the rows of old votive candles.
I have written about this previously, applying that theory to all of Paris rather than just Notre Dame, if
you are interested.
You will say it is too late regardless, what’s done is done regarding Notre Dame. No. It could easily be
returned to any former state, as long as we have pictures of how it was. They can make new picture
frames that look almost exactly like old picture frames, by antiquing them. You use the old materials
and then add a patina, etc. I have done it. You could do the same thing for most of what was lost at
Notre Dame, not including Old Master paintings and sculpture. However, most sculpture is bronze,
stone, or terracotta, which survives a fire unless it has something fall on it. I believe the loss was
minimal there. But they didn’t even try to do that at Notre Dame, modernizing the interior in horrible
ways.
I believe some of this will soon be reversed. They will eventually figure out I am right here and
reverse a lot of these decisions. You will say they can’t make it darker and dirtier, but they actually
can, and should. And if they don’t, God will, given time. Where man is shallow, God is deep, and all
returns to him.
In my opinion, Europe needs to be protected more and restored less. The old things need to remain old,
if for no other reason than that is what people are coming to see. No one wants to see a restored
Roman Forum or a rebuilt Stonehenge. Save that for Las Vegas.
But back to the US. If I am right and Trump is just running another feint, with the Phoenicians behind
both parties planning to replace the middle class with an imported slave population, that is another
reason to move up the revolution to tomorrow. One of my readers from England asked me today if he
needed to stockpile food for a week and prepare for war, as he is being told by the news. I told him no,
that was just more fear porn being used to justify another increase in “defense” spending. But now I
add that you don’t need a stockpile if you are prepping for a revolution that starts tomorrow. In a
revolution, it will be the Phoenicians shut in, not you. They need a stockpile, but you don’t. And they
know that: why do you think they have built all the bunkers? If they believed their own bluffs, they
wouldn’t need bunkers, would they?
I feel I can’t end without reminding you one more time: your revolution in the US or Europe is not
against the immigrants, of any color, or your fellow citizens of any color. It is against the Phoenicians
pushing this chaos for a century, that is to say the governors. They will try to get you fighting the
immigrants or your neighbors or your wives or your children or your parents, but don’t fall for it. You
want a revolution, not a civil war. There is a big difference
