The ‘Epstein Class’ is a term used to describe the Jews, crypto-Jews, and compromised or deluded Gentiles connected to the pedophile Jeffery Epstein, whose interactions were recorded in what has been called the ‘Epstein files’. These files revealed the communication of a group with a vast political and financial power and a malevolent agenda.

For example, Hollywood producer Barry Josephson wrote to Jeffrey Epstein:

“I’ve been thinking a lot about that question that you asked Bill Gates, ‘how do we get rid of poor people as a whole,’ and I have an answer/comment regarding that for you… when can I call you today to discuss this?”

Epstein’s reply not only acknowledged the ‘problem’ but suggested that Josephson raise his “answer” directly with Gates at an upcoming meeting.

While it is at least possible that the expression “get rid of poor people as a whole” may have a meaning that is not malevolent, it must be noted that the above exchange occurred after Epstein had been convicted for pedophilia and included him asking Josephson to recommend an “amazing women” as his ‘personal assistant’.

To which Josephson replied to the pedophile – (paraphrased closely from multiple reports of the email):

• “I have ‘the’ girl.”
• “Young, attractive, insane rack.”
• She is “smart, although not a genius, but very efficient, will do anything, and tight lipped period end of story.”

Offering a young woman that “will do anything” and is “tight lipped period end of story” to a convicted pedophile is an act of malevolence. As it it an exchange between two Jews likely concerning a Gentile (Katherine Khuat), it is also racist.

The idea that his deranged sexual exploitations stemmed from Jewish racism is expressed by Epstein himself in his emails, He wrote: “[Redacted] said that she felt gods presence next to her when she was in bed.. she knows that jesus watches over her and he helped save her life. Whoops.”

The Epstein Class’s racism towards the Goyim is visible throughout the exchanges. In his 2009 email to the Jewish cognitive psychologist Roger Schank: Epstein wrote: “This is the way the jew make money.. and made a fortune in the past ten years„ selling short the shippping futures„ let the goyim deal in the real world.”

Given that the files revealed a hidden perspective, is not surprising that they also suggested that the Epstein Class held an occulted understanding of 9/11.

In a 2003 email Edward Jay Epstein (no relation to Jeffrey Epstein) invited Ghislaine Maxwell to join a “Shadow Commission on 9/11.”

“Any interest in being on the Shadow Commission on 9/11? The membership list is secret.”

The files do not indicate what cryptic understanding of 9/11 the “Shadow Commission” held. In fact, as shown below, the Epstein class saw the attacks on September 11, 2001 as a long-prepared religious ceremony that proclaimed the end the Christian era and the beginning of a Jewish dominated New World Order.

With their ceremony, the Epstein class intended to produce a typological ‘eye for eye’ revenge on the Gentiles for their destruction of the Jews’ Temple in the first century. Moreover, they reversed the claim made by the Romans that the date of the Temple’s destruction proved it had been ordained by God. In other words, with the date September the 11, 2001 the Epstein class was indicating that God was on its side and not the Gentiles’.

In Caesar’s Messiah I showed that the time span between Jesus’ crucifixion and the end of the Jewish war was artificially created as a typological mirror of the period between the first Passover and the forty years of wandering by the Israelites. In other words, the authors of the Gospels backdated the sacrifice of the ‘Passover lamb of the New Covenant’ – Jesus’ crucifixion on Passover 33 CE – to be precisely forty years from the conclusion of the war between the Romans and the Jews, which occurred on Passover 73 CE, the day Masada fell and Rome gained control over all of the ‘Promised Land’. With this ‘miraculous’ parallel, the authors’ of the Gospels were indicating that the New Covenant had a divine origin like the old one.

As mentioned above, the Romans also falsified the date that they destroyed the Jews’ Temple to align it with its prior destruction by the Babylonians. They did this to again suggest that the event had been sanctioned by God. The first Temple (built by Solomon) was destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BCE on the 10th of Av.

In his history of the Jewish war, the Flavian court historian Josephus explicitly stated that the second Temple was destroyed on the same date as the first and that this showed that its destruction was divine judgment:

“But as for that house, God had, for certain, long ago doomed it to the fire; and now that fatal day was come, according to the revolution of ages; it was the tenth day of the month Ab, upon

which it was formerly burnt by the king of Babylon; although these flames took their rise from the Jews themselves, and were occasioned by them.” Jewish War ( Whiston, 6.250)

Rabbinical Judaism commemorates the date of the two destructions on the 9th of Av not the tenth, because the Talmud (Ta’anit 29a) describes a multi-day process:

The Babylonians entered and defiled the Temple around the 7th.

They set the fire toward evening on the 9th of Av.

The Temple continued burning through the 10th.

Thus, Jewish tradition emphasizes the 9th as the date when the destruction began in earnest (the fire was lit), and have made that date the day of mourning.

This date – the 9th day of the 11th month or 9/11 – is in Hebrew ‘Tisha B’Av’. It is on this day that the destruction of both Jewish Temples is observed with a 25-hour fast, mourning, and a reading from the Book of Lamentations.

To understand the symbolism created by using September 11, 2001 as the date for the attacks, one must recognize that the Hebrew calendar has a different way of counting months than the Gregorian. Month one in the Jewish Civil calendar is called

Tishrei, the month of Rosh Hashanah. This month is considered the “head” of the year thereby making Av the 11th month.

The different systems enabled the Epstein Class to create a hidden typology. They held their ‘ceremony’ on the ninth day of the eleventh month in the Gregorian calendar to represent the day the Jews’ Temples were destroyed, that is 9/11. Thus, ’September 11’ was chosen as the day for the destruction of the buildings in New York simply to represent the numbers 9 and 11 and thereby mimic the day in the Jewish calendar of Tisha B’Av.

It is hard to understand why the 9/11 connection between Tisha B’Av and September 11 has not been noticed by more researchers. September 11 is the only day of the Gregorian calendar that can represent Tisha B’, thus one would expect some curiosity regarding the attacks having occurred on that date.

This is especially surprising in that many have interpreted the September 11 attacks as a ‘Masonic/occult ritual’ due to the repeated use of the number 11 – Flight 11, New York as the 11th state, the Twin Towers resembling the number 11, and the 11th day of the month when the attacks occurred.

Tisha B’ Av was a day of disaster for the Gentiles on another occasion. World War One began on Tisha B’Av 1914 – August 1, 1914, the date that Germany declared war on Russia. France (Russia’s ally) also began mobilization that day, beginning the catastrophic slaughter of Gentiles.

Another falsification using the number 11 to show that a ‘divine hand’ was at work had occurred a few months earlier with the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand (June 28). The license plate on the car in which the Archduke Franz was assassinated was A III 118, which can be understood as: Armistice, November 11, 1918. In other words the license plate seems to have foreseen the day the war would end.

While it is possible that the beginning and end of WW! had these linkages by accident, it is suspicious in the context of the Roman typology above, which also linked to the end of a war. Of course, understanding the license plate as deliberate typology is a grim thought in that it indicates that both sides of the war were controlled by the Epstein Class. However, this idea is at least plausible in that the leadership of both sides of the conflict were Masonic and could have arranged such secret occurrences. Moreover, notice that the ‘foreseen’ 11/11 date of the war’s end repeats the theme of using the number 11 in a magical way that foresees an event in the future.

The most important part of the pattern using the number 11 was George H. W. Bush’s ‘new world order’ speech that he gave on September 11, 1990. In his speech he stated:”We stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. — a new world order — can emerge: a new era — ,,, Today that new world is struggling to be born, a world quite different from the one we’ve known. ,,,, A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle..”

In hindsight, Bush’s statement is a barely cryptic declaration by a member of the Epstein Class envisioning a post-Christian world. He delivered that speech precisely 11 years to the day from the destruction of the three buildings in New York.

Obviously, Bush senior’s 9/11 speech was intentionally linked to the ‘ceremony’ 11 years in the future that would symbolically mark the end of the Christian era and the beginning of a Jewish one – the new world order. Further, the exact 11 year relationship between the two events proves the theory of this article. This is because it shows that the date of 9/11 was deliberately chosen for both events, and only coherent reason to link to that date is the one provided here.

To construct the overall typological declaration, the year selected for the destruction of the buildings was 2001 – the first year of of the ‘New World Order’ that was to replace the Christian one. With the 2001 date the Epstein class was mocking the prophecy in Revelation 20, which describes a Christian era of two sequential millennial eras (one for the righteous, followed by another 1000 year phase).

By linking to Revelation, the Epstein class reversed the technique used throughout the New Testament wherein

Jesus fulfilled Old Testament prophecy, though in an different manner than the one that the Jewish prophets envisioned.

Many of the details the media presented to the public on that day were related to the theme of Tisha B’Av. It is only when they are viewed as a collection, however, that the incrementally built theme becomes visible. Thus, it was not circumstantial that President George W. Bush was reading the children’s book “The Pet Goat” to a group of second-graders on the morning of September 11, 2001.

Animal sacrifices in ancient Judaism could only be performed in the Temple in Jerusalem. Once the Temple was destroyed, the entire sacrificial system ended. Lamb sacrifices such as the Paschal (Passover) lamb ceased.

With his ‘pet goat’ Bush was suggesting that in the ‘new world order’ his father had predicted was here and the Temple will be rebuilt so that sacrifices can be performed again. Therefore a goat will be needed. The “pet goat” is also a mockery of Jesus – the sacrificed Pascal lamb.

The names of the buildings that were destroyed were also part of the symbolic theme. The destruction of the World Trade Center fulfills the prophecy of (Revelation 18:17, 19). Which envisions ‘world trade’ halting abruptly.

“In one hour such great wealth has been brought to ruin!”

“And all shipmasters and seafaring men, sailors and all whose trade is on the sea,”

Thus the destruction of the World Trade Center fulfills the prophecy – albeit tongue in cheek.

The third building that was brought down was known by two names – Building 7 and the Solomon Brothers Building – both names are part of the symbolic framework.

The Hebrew word for seven (sheva) shares consonants with the word for “complete” or “full” (sava), something brought to its ideal, sanctified conclusion. God created the world in six days and rested on the seventh, sanctifying it as Shabbat (the Sabbath). Thus, the final building brought down was named ‘Seven’ to conclude the 2000 year Christian era.

Moreover, it was also called the Salomon building. ‘Saloman’ is a derivative of Solomon. The fact that a ‘Solomon Building’ was destroyed on 9/11 would be curious under any circumstances, but becomes obvious as deliberate typology in light of the famous claim by a BBC reporter that the ‘Salomon Building’ had been destroyed while the building in New York was still standing.

At 5:08 PM September 11, 2001, BBC correspondent Jane Standley was shown standing in front of a window framing smoke rising from Ground Zero and a clearly erect WTC 7 in the background. The caption on the bottom of the screen read:

“The 47 story Salomon Brothers building close to the World Trade Centre has also collapsed.”

The point of the seemingly absurd declaration was part of the typological theme. The ‘collapsed Solomon building’ was obviously not the one still standing, but the one that already collapsed on a previous 9/11 – the Temple of Solomon that ‘collapsed’ on 70 BCE.

This explanation of the symbolism also makes clear the reason behind the many strange foreshadowings of the events of September 11, 2001. The Epstein class knew the ‘ceremony’ was to occur on that date and were able to ‘predict’ this as a way of mocking Goyim who believe in prophecy.

As examples:

In “The City of New York vs. Homer Simpson,” viewed in 1997, a brochure for a “$9″ bus fare to New York shows the Twin Towers in the background forming the numbers “9/11”. A plane-like shape image in the background completes the symbolism.

The Lone Gunmen pilot episode (March 4, 2001, X-Files spin-off): Rogue government elements remotely hijack a commercial airliner and attempt to crash it into the World Trade Center to provoke a war and boost arms sales.

The Matrix (1999): Neo’s (Thomas Anderson’s) passport expires on September 11, 2001 (visible in the interrogation scene).

Another coincidence linking September 11 to the 2001 attacks was the Pentagon’s groundbreaking ceremony, which occurred exactly 60 years before the attack that destroyed part of it.

Jeffery Epstein’s purported death was also a part of the Tisha B’Av typology. While the comically missing tapes of his suicide have received great attention, the most relevant aspect of his death has been unnoticed. His ‘death’ occurred on Tisha B’Av.

Epstein was reportedly found unresponsive in his cell around 6:30 a.m. on August 10, 2019, and was pronounced dead at the hospital shortly afterward (around 6:39–7:36 a.m. depending on the exact report). The fact that the surveillance video of his cell was not available was not the only reason to understand the suicide as fictional. Tisha B’Av (the 9th of Av) in 2019 began at sundown on Saturday, August 10, 2019, and ended at sundown on Sunday, August 11.

Epstein’s suicide (per the official claim) therefore occurred during the Tisha B’Av period on the Jewish calendar, specifically on the day it was being observed. Needless to say, if the death had been recorded on September 11 the linkage to the attacks would have too obvious and raised suspicion, so the Jewish calendar’s 9/11 was selected.

However, the point being made by placing Epstein’s fictional death on Tisha B’Av seems clear enough. The commemoration on 9/11 is, among other things, a call for revenge for the destruction of the Temple by the murdering of Gentile children.

Psalm 137 (“Al Naharot Bavel” / By the Rivers of Babylon) is recited during Tisha B’Av:

By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat, sat and wept, as we thought of Zion.how they said, “Raze it, raze it, to its very foundations!”

Fair Babylon, you destroyer—

happy is the one who repays you in kind, what you have done to us.

Happy is the one who seizes and dashes your babies against the rock!

The claim that Epstein’s fictional death occurred on Tisha B’Av seems to have intended to create the impression that his murder and rape of Gentile children was condoned by God as revenge for the destruction of the Temple.

The genocide implicit in Psalm 137 was widely referenced and condoned by the Epstein class. For example, Epstein’s cohort Ghislaine Maxwell authored and forwarded the following email to 42 contacts in the Epstein Class.

“ It is the year 2032, and a father and his son walk the streets of lower Manhattan.

Approaching the site where the (World Trade Centre) used to be in the end of the 20th century, the father sighs and comments, ‘to think that right here used to be the Twin Towers…’

The son, not understanding, asks his father: ‘What are the Twin Towers?’

The father smiles and looks at the son, and explains, ‘The Twin Towers were two huge buildings that used to be here until 2001, when the Arabs destroyed them.’

The son looks up to his father, and asks, ‘And what are the Arabs?’

Among the social circle she felt would enjoy such genocidal humor was “The Invisible Man” (signed as “A”) an alias linked to Prince Andrew.

Maxwell also sent it Thomas Pritzker, the Jewish Hyatt Hotels billionaire. The Pritzker communication is important in that it illuminates the thought world of Jewish billionaires, a key element of the Epstein Class’s political and media control.

It is easy to imagine that the people who laughed at the joke would have enjoyed watching the videos of the destruction of Gaza and the Palestinian people.

The oligarchs of the Epstein Class believe they are still fighting the first century war against Rome and takes their moral perspective from that struggle. This is to say, it is fighting what Churchill called Total War, a battle to entirely destroy another ethnicity, in which there are no moral restrictions.

Total War is an instruction within the Jews’ Scripture.

For example, the following passage was the basis for Netanyahu’s referring to the Palestinians and Iranians as ‘Amalek’:

“This is what the Lord Almighty says: ‘I have noted what Amalek did to Israel in opposing them on the way when they came up from Egypt. Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.’” (1 Samuel 15:2-)

The Epstein Class wishes to have the planet to itself. To prevent this, those who understand need to speak up against the process. We must never be silenced by sophisms like ‘anti-Semite’, ‘holocaust denier’, ‘conspiracy theory’ or truther’.

A fundamental component of democracy has always been ‘parrhesia’ – fearless speech. There has never been a better time to engage in it.