Two months ago, one of my fraternity brothers died of a heart attack. It is not unusual to die from a heart attack, and even less so for someone over seventy. My fraternity brother was a noted medical authority and a university professor.

Back in 2021, right when the Covid Plandemic was at its peak, he sent us all an email proudly announcing that the urgently awaited Covid jab from Pfizer had finally arrived and that he considered himself lucky to be among the first in the country to take the shot. He urged us all to take one as soon as they would become generally available.

Being skeptical regarding the official Covid narrative, I sent out an email to the now deceased professor and to the other frat brothers who were also physicians. I asked how serious or lethal the covid virus really was, if it was guaranteed that the vaccine was not more dangerous than the disease and if there might be other remedies against the virus. I sent out the same email to the physicians in our family. After a long wait, I eventually got an answer. Not from any of the two professors, not from my own brother or brother-in-law, but from a frat brother who was a family doctor out in the provinces: “yes, the virus is very serious and people can get very, very sick. There are even some who die from it.”

Although pertinent and relevant, my questions were not answered. On the contrary, the answer I got was well-meant but clearly nonsensical. Any disease can be nasty and can cause death.

The most important conclusion to be drawn was that, with one exception, none of those doctors whom I knew well deigned or dared answer some simple and logical questions!

If anything, this really shook what remained of my confidence in the medical profession. If even friends and family members would not answer some simple questions, which other doctor would?

As it turned out later, in the EU there were hundreds, probably thousands of doctors who tried to honestly inform their patients and the public, but their voices were not heard in the media, while social media were strictly censored regarding anything to do with Covid. Those doctors who nevertheless dared to deal with the issue in a sense that diverged from the officially permitted narrative and ensuing protocols imposed from above, were severely reprimanded and punished. Some were sent to jail.

According to official data, there are 1.82 million practicing physicians in the EU, about four per thousand inhabitants. Including retired doctors, there are at least two million doctors, for 450 million people. In addition, there are 456,000 pharmacists working in pharmacies, 365,000 dentists, and 3.6 million nurses. Overall, there are at least seven million medical personnel, to which number should also be added thousands working in the various health ministries, in hospital administration staffs, in health insurance companies, as ambulance personnel, in the pharmaceutical industry, so that the total number of people employed in the “health industry” may be between eight million and ten million people. Add to that the number of dependents and family members, and one could say that some twenty million EU citizens depend wholly or partly on money earned in the health business. According to official figures, health care spending in the EU in 2022 was ten percent of GNP, en enormous figure, while the EU pharmaceuticals market was estimated at over 500 billion Euro in 2024.

Given those numbers, it is not very surprising that governments and business would want to make sure that physicians take the kind of decisions (i.e. make diagnoses and write prescriptions according to strict guidelines) that sustain the system and make it profitable. In a sense, the almost two million physicians are the front troops of the system. As long as they prescribe the pills and vaccinations that the pharmaceutical industry produces, the system will thrive. One could also say those almost two million doctors are drug pushers just as much as street dealers in marijuana, cocaine and fentanyl. This latter business in Europe is estimated at 30 billion Euro (2019), but this is all tax free.

In all EU member states, doctors are organized in national medical associations that help maintain professional cohesion. This legal and professional framework is needed to uphold unanimity, also called medical “consensus.” All European physicians are expected to think alike and hold the same beliefs about their profession and how to exercise it. Nevertheless, they all take the Hippocratic oath, which on the face of it leaves room for each doctor to make up his own mind, make his own diagnosis on each and every patient and decide how to treat them. The Great Covid Show has demonstrated that, on the contrary, all EU doctors had to follow decisions on treatment taken at government level (“protocol”) and enforced by the state bureaucracy, police and legal authorities. It was strictly forbidden to prescribe alternative remedies like hydroxichloroquine and Ivermectine and the few doctors who dared do so nonetheless were severely sanctioned. Likewise, doctors were punished who gave their patients a signed statement relieving them of the obligation to wear a face mask during the Great Covid Show.

In line with centralized medicine, medical students across the EU are being trained to think alike and behave like loyal members of the state-directed medical establishment. In other words, the EU medical establishment (already part of a global network controlled and managed by the WHO), functions like the Roman Catholic Church or a traditional old-style Communist Party. Medical “consensus” (imposed top-down) is for physicians what dogma is for Roman Catholic clergy and the party line for Communists. All physicians are required to adhere to medical consensus and those who don’t are made to pay for it. It means that in practice the Hippocratic oath is no more than a cute folkloric custom without content or true meaning.

Just go visit your doctor. Especially if he (or she, since these days more and more doctors are female) is under 60, you will sit down facing a doctor who is not facing you but looking at his screen. The hands on the keyboard, he types, as he asks you the questions from a decision tree on the screen. Then after a few questions and answers, he will read you the diagnosis from his screen. Then your doctor will prescribe some pills and you must leave and make room for the next patient. If those pills don’t work, you will be operated on and those parts of your body that do not perform will be cut off or taken out, after which you will have to take more pills. That is how the system works and it is very hard for doctors and patients to escape. Doctors have mortgages and bills to pay and patients continue trusting their doctor and the system.

The present system was developed in the course of the 20^th century, and at an accelerated rate after the end of World War II. One could therefore say that the currently prevailing health industry in the EU is of American origin.

During the mid-1880s, when Europe (that is, the territory occupied today by EU member states) had 200 million inhabitants, France had 15,000 physicians and over 6,000 pharmacists. In 1873, there were 15,000 practicing doctors in Germany. Thus, there were probably something like 60,000 physicians at work. In the early 1900s, France had 7.5 thousand medical students, Germany almost nine thousand, Austria 4.5 thousand. Since it took about seven years for a medical student to complete his studies and graduate as a medical doctor, this means that each year, in both France and Germany about a thousand young doctors would enter the profession. With doctors retiring and dying each year, one can conclude the total number of physicians would grow very moderately. Basically, there were between three and four doctors for every 10,000 inhabitants, ten times less than today.

Back in those days, most people would not be able to afford to see a doctor when they were ill. In that case, they would take the advice of a grandmother or some herb lady and that would very often take care of the issue. Some people would go to the pharmacy and ask the local pharmacist for advice. Until recently this was still a common practice in Southern Europe and Latin America. Physicians were then still fundamentally individuals and not cogs in a centrally managed system. One might retort that life expectancy at birth was much lower than today and that people on the whole had shorter lives, but that is more to do with high infancy death rates and an absence of effective means to fight bugs and parasites. It had nothing to do with access to medical care and physicians.

The most serious evil in today’s health care system is the rigid imposition of one single kind of medicine, the foundations of which were laid by dubious figures such as Louis Pasteur and Robert Koch. Most physicians follow the dictates of prevailing medical orthodoxy and have only contempt for other medical traditions. Wikipedia lists some hundred varieties of “Fringe medicine and science,” yet these include approaches such as acupuncture, reflexology (both from the Chinese medical tradition) and homeopathy.

It is the strict adherence to prevailing medical orthodoxy that explains why physicians have not been protesting massively against the spraying of all sorts of substances (“chemtrails”), against the widespread use of poisonous additives in the food industry, against the declaration of certain cholesterol levels as dangerous for human health (needed for the marketing of harmful statines) and dozens of other common practices and erroneous assumptions on the basis of medical “consensus.”

One might also wonder why there is no massive outcry by physicians against the excesses of gender lunacy and the entire highly profitable circus of transition and gender change operations. Or against the legalization of abortion to just before birth (as now legally permitted in some EU countries). Thus, medical experimentation and murder, when committed behind the cloak of “health care,” are now allowed in the EU.

One can only conclude that the medical establishment has become morally corrupt without realizing it. The warped philosophy of the modern EU medical establishment and most physicians has now reached the point where doctors put themselves in danger without realizing it. Although there is no proof that my frat brother died as a result of having taken the Pfizer vaccination against Covid, there is abundant statistical and medical evidence to support the view that there is a causal relationship between those vaccines and heart disease.

Is your family doctor still to be trusted? Can one have confidence in the surgeon, the dentist, the nurses, the hospital staff? Can one be sure that the pharmaceutical industry is interested in more than just making a fast buck? Can one trust the health ministry? I should say the answer is “no” to all these questions. One could say that, today, the diagnosis by a physician is in fact one dictated by some anonymous state bureaucrat lacking even the most basic medical knowledge.

It is about time for a through reorganization of the EU health care system.