The Fake Artemis Mission to the Moon. Worse than anyone could have predicted
Sat 1:59 pm +00:00, 4 Apr 2026
Source, extracts below, full article at link: https://mileswmathis.com/nawsa.pdf
And now for a close look at the Artemis mission to the Moon, which we are told launched on
Wednesday. I already had proof it was faked going in, since if it were real it should have been delayed
due to Solar storms hitting the Earth then. This is exactly why we monitor these things, since they can
affect such launches and missions. Solar activity is very wild right now, so it is an awful time to
schedule a launch to the Moon. There was an unexpected X-class flare three days ago, and the fullhalo CME that came out of that was expected to reach the Earth Wednesday, on the day of launch.
Even worse, we have had very strange meteor showers and fireballs over the US for the past week,
including in Florida, so again, not a good time for a Moon launch. Possibly the worst timing ever. We
have had earthquakes all over the world due to this Solar activity, and the strange heatwave in the West
was also due to this activity, with Phoenix going to 105 two weeks ago when it was technically still
winter.
But of course they had to have the launch on April 1, because you are an April fool.
And of course Matt Walsh was selling this launch as real yesterday, all the more reason to assume it is
fake.
mainstream geophysicist Stefan Burns, who confirms everything I just said. Notice for example that
even when they aren’t in the Van Allen belts, these astronauts would be experiencing 10x elevated
Solar radiation from current activity, or would if this whole thing weren’t fake. See min. 7:00, where
he shows you that the Solar Wind velocity is way up to 850, almost double the norm. Notice that he
says the Sun is “very active” right now, which of course contradicts what the Air Force has been saying
for months, reporting a “quiet” Sun, to try to quash my Solar Cycle prediction. He says at min 5:40,
“All the spots we see on the Sun right now”. Air Force has been refusing to see those or undercounting
them for months, but apparently Burns can see them. Unfortunately, after tacitly admitting that this
was the worst of all possible weeks for a trip to the Moon (the title of his video is The Space
Environment just Turned Dangerous), at min 7:50 Burns begins selling the Artemis launch, showing
you a CGI film he claims is shot from a Cessna owned by NASA. Ridiculous, unless this is some new
Cessna that can rise straight up vertically at 10,000ft/s. Also notice that the Cessna video doesn’t match
the mainstream video just below. See the color of the sky at min 9:40 of Burns’ video: black, to
indicate the darkness of space. But the in the video we watched on Wednesday, the sky was light blue.]
If you didn’t watch that original footage, you still can: go watch video of the launch, which is even
more pathetic than I thought it would be. Notice that the opening of the launch looks like CGI, then we
see real video of a rocket (they do have rockets) but it looks far too small, like a 1/10 scale model or
something. After just a few seconds it peaks and soon looks like it is going down. Why would this
rocket to the Moon be going down after just a few seconds?
See, blue sky, not black. And the rocket isn’t just going down, the announcer admits the rocket is
throttling down after two minutes, and the boosters are jettisoned. Really, after two minutes? Man,
sure was easy to get out of the Earth’s atmosphere, right? Reminds us of the fake Musk and Bezos
launches, where we saw the same thing: the reaching of space way too fast.
Then we cut to more obvious CGI video from the rocket exterior, where the boosters are supposedly
floating in the background of the shot. Except that the two sequences don’t match, since in the shot
from the ground the boosters are still flaming, and even after flaming out they have smoke and vapor
tracks. But in the view from the rocket there are no flames or tracks behind the boosters. Whoops.
What else is wrong? Please look for yourself. I will give you a moment.
From the Earth, we see the rocket has a large tail flame, even after the boosters are gone. That is what
the bright spot is. But from the rocket, we see no tail flame at all, just a little pathetic smoke tail (min.
3:20). You should already be done with this fake.
and
His bio is like the others, being a pilot. He completed fighter training in 2003, at age 27, somewhat
late, and then worked in Arctic Flying Operations, among other things, so we have that again. He was
recruited in 2009 at age 33, again very late, graduating from astronaut training at 35. Rather than go
into space, Canada sent him into some Italian caves in 2013 and to the ocean floor in Florida in 2014.
He did nothing worth mentioning for almost nine years, when he was tapped for this Artemis fake in
2023. You would think this “return trip to the Moon” would be the biggest thing in 50 years, with four
cream-of-the-crop astronauts, but instead we find four wrinkled and dyed old geezers with very puny
bios. It makes absolutely no sense, as usual.
But they don’t care anymore. They don’t even bother to try to make this look real, and NASA seems
content with the idea no one will buy this. After all, it doesn’t matter if you buy it. You will be billed
for it whether you buy it or not. You will be taxed for all these fakes regardless, so why waste money
making the staging and propaganda seamless, or even passable? Why not just have AI mock it up
overnight, since then all the money can go directly to these billionaire assholes like Isaacman and the
Phoenician Navy bigwig trillionaires behind him.
