Why the Solar Cycles are So Important
Sun 3:21 pm +00:00, 22 Feb 2026 1
Source, first 3 pages below, 5 more pages plus his links here: https://milesmathis.com/pred.pdf
This is for my art/history site readers, some of whom aren’t getting my whole Solar Cycle prediction.
Those on my science site generally understand how big this is, but many on my art/history site can’t
follow my arguments and graphs and so on, and can’t see what I have been on about for the past six
years. Understandable, so I am here to clarify it for you, helping you to see how momentous this is.
To start with, everything that happens here on the Earth is driven by the Sun. All energy here comes
from the Sun, not just sunlight and heat, but all magnetism, electricity, vulcanism, weather, biology,
crops, EVERYTHING. All the heat of the Earth comes from the Sun. The mainstream thinks the
Earth is hot from an iron core and radionuclides and so on, but it isn’t. It is hot because it is recycling
charge from the Sun. The Earth is a huge spinning charge engine, pulling energy in from the Sun at its
poles, feeding on that energy, and excreting it back out radially in all directions. So you aren’t just
being heated by Sunlight from above, you are being heated by charge rising from below you. And it all
comes from the Sun.
It has been known since the time of Galileo that the Sun has sunspots, which are a sign of its activity,
and that the Sun has a repeating cycle of this activity, running about eleven years. Every eleven years
on average we have a Solar maximum, with Solar minima being about halfway between those peaks.
Sunspots are black dots on the Sun, and they have developed a method of counting them to measure
Solar activity. But they are found in white regions, and you could just as easily count up those regions
by some method as a measure of activity. See the photograph of the Sun above. Sunspots are found in
those white regions.
Until now, no one understood what was causing the Solar Cycles. Mainstream theory has for a long
time been that it is something to do with convection currents in the Sun itself. So to predict future
activity, they tend to study past activity, trying to find patterns they can then extrapolate out into the
future. That has never worked for them, and all their predictions have been horrible failures. They
mostly admit that. Or used to until I came along. It was easy for them to admit it before, since they
had no competition. Everyone had been spectacularly wrong, and no harm done. But once I
successfully predicted the current one, the mainstream has gone through most of Kubler-Ross’ five
stages of grief, so far exhibiting noisy bouts of denial, anger, and depression. I haven’t witnessed any
bargaining, and we still appear to be several years away from acceptance.
More than a century ago, a few specialists in the field noticed that there was a similar cycle of JupiterSaturn conjunctions on an 11.5 year period, so they suggested maybe the big planets were causing the
Solar Cycles, by some unknown mechanism. But since gravity was the only known force between
bodies back then, they couldn’t make that work. The forces at those distances weren’t large enough,
and they didn’t follow the patterns in the cycles very well anyway. So they gave up. Since then a few
others have tried to make that work, but also with no real success. For that reason, the mainstream
decided that simply couldn’t be the cause, and they did their usual closing of ranks, ridiculing anyone
who worked on it in those terms as an astrologer or other crank.
So that was the state of the problem when I first looked at it in 2014. But as usual I was coming from a
whole new direction. I had recently proven that the celestial field was a unified field, meaning it wasn’t
just gravity. It was gravity + charge/EM. EM meaning electromagnetism, which is based on charge.
As it turns out, Newton’s famous old gravity equation had been hiding the EM field inside it all along,
but no one had ever seen that. And where was it hiding it? Inside the constant G. Yes, an entire
second field was hiding inside that one old constant, that no one had ever thought to question. It just
sat there unassigned for 300 years, no one asking why it was the number and dimensions it was. But
once I pulled it apart, I not only had a unified field, I had a new way of looking at all the old problems.
I also had a way of pulling apart all the old equations, writing them as unified field equations instead of
gravity-only equations. Meaning, I could take any old equation of Newton, Galileo, Kepler,
Copernicus, Lagrange, Laplace, Euler, or anyone else, and show you the part of it that was due to EM.
That is what allowed me to solve the Bode problem as well as the Planetary Tilt problem. By writing
these old equations as dual equations where half of them was gravity and half was EM, I was able to
explain why the planets were spaced as they are, and why they were tilted as they are. And not just
explain it, but rewrite all the equations. No one had ever been able to do that, either. Before I arrived,
the mainstream thought planets were tilted due to being hit by asteroids or comets or moons. Actually,
they still do, since they are still pretending I don’t exist. Denial and anger, you know.
So anyway, I already had that under my belt when I looked at the Solar Cycle problem. Therefore it
was easy for me to see that it must be caused not by gravity, but by an EM feedback loop between all
four big planets and the Sun. What do I mean by feedback loop? I just mean that there are real, heavy
lines of charge running between all bodies, and the planets are influencing one another on those lines.
So this isn’t astrology or action at a distance. It isn’t based just on position. It is based on charge
influences, and charge is real photons. Real particles being recycled through the Sun and planets, and
running in lines between them, like a very powerful gas. The charge field moves out from the Sun to
the planets, they take it in at their poles, recycle it through their bodies, then send it back to the Sun.
The mainstream now knows about this field to a large extent, since it knows about the hugely powerful
Solar Wind, plasma fields, Birkeland currents, and many Solar System motions, perturbations, and
influences that simply can’t be explained by gravity. But it hasn’t figured out this field is ubiquitous, or
that it can be used to solve these old problems.
There was one other thing I had to figure out to solve this, and it took me a couple more years to bring
it all together. I also needed the Galactic Core to solve. You see, the Sun and planets aren’t just
creating this cycle relative to one another. The cycle creates a sine wave if you graph it, like any other
cycle, but then the question becomes, what is the zero-line of that sine wave? Is the Sun the zero-point,
or are all these bodies aligning to an outside line. An outside influence. Another way to put that is, is
the Sun the source of all this charge? Where is all this energy ultimately coming from? Just as the
mainstream thinks the Earth is the source of its own heat in the core, it thinks the Sun is the source of
its own heat, by fusion. But it isn’t. Yes, the Sun is fusing and creating heat that way, but it requires an
outside source in order to start that cycle and to keep it running smoothly. Just as we get all our energy
from the Sun, the Sun gets all his energy from the Galactic Core.
What is the Galactic Core? It is huge power plant at the center of the Milky Way galaxy, in the
direction of Sagittarius. As the Sun drives the Solar System, the Core drives the galaxy. You can think
of it like a trillion Suns all in the same area, or as one gigantic Sun. We don’t really know how it sets
up, because our telescopes can’t penetrate that area. But the important thing is that the Sun gets all his
energy in a line coming in from the Core. So the sine wave of the Solar Cycle sets up in relation to that
zero point or axis. When the planets align best, they aren’t just aligning to the Sun, they are aligning to
the Sun/Core line. So you start by drawing a line from the Sun to the Core, then watch when the
planets align to that.
If you do that, you can then track the magnetic alignments in the system. This is magnetic, not
gravitational, and we now know that because only magnetism works on alignments like this. Gravity
doesn’t care about these alignments, but magnetism does. You can see that with your refrigerator
magnets, which work only when they are in a certain configuration. If you turn them 90 degrees, they
stop working as before. This is because magnetism is created by quantum spins (real spinning photons
and electrons) and gravity isn’t. A pool ball spinning N/S won’t act like a pool ball spinning E/W, when
it collides, for instance. But you can calculate gravity without knowing anything about spins.
If you didn’t understand all of that, it doesn’t matter. What matters is that I was able to solve where no
one else did because I used EM instead of gravity. Also because I understood how these celestial fields
work where no one else did. I had a unified field and unified field equations that actually allowed me
to calculate forces between planets and the Sun. In this case, the lines of influence were more
important than the actual forces, though it helped to know forces, too.
Now, there are two big reasons this is so important, one having to do with the history of science, and
one having to do with the future of humanity. The reason I am publishing this paper on February 20 is
that this is the peak of the current Saturn-Neptune alignment. The Core, Sun, Saturn, and Neptune are
all in alignment this month, and my theory of Solar Cycles is one of alignment of real charge fields.
Which is why I predicted a big spike here six years ago.
Excellent post.