Is history a hidden story?
Sat 12:28 am +00:00, 7 Jun 2025 3Genghis Khan was described in old books as a Tartar not a Mongol….
Why were the Great Exhibitions built in two years then knocked and burned down as temporary buildings when they were made from stone and marble?
I find it fascinating watching the videos of the ancient Tartarian empire and the old technologies like the moving walkways – and other technologies apparently lost to the world – the supposed free energy.
The videos that suggest cities like Chicago and San Francisco were wooden primitive camps and became finished cities as today just twenty years later, with no evidence/photos of building and scaffolding.
I have never read a comprehensive description of what all this adds up to – who were the Tartars?
The babies in incubators at the world fairs. Where did the babies come from?
I’m afraid this is all mystery with little explanation. The more you look into it the more mysterious it becomes.
Usually you can find something to hang research on, but not with his topic. Does anyone have any way to approach this topic? Or suggested researchers to follow?
Roger Spurr suggests that The Grand Canyon was created by electric arcing when Venus passed very close to Earth, 3500 years ago. That’s all I can find.
Otherwise all the videos show impossible mysteries suggesting history we are given must be fabricated and ignores earlier phases of human civilization when energy was free.
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1031906091689617
Yes all these amazing old buildings, what a beautiful world it must have been in which to live.
Here in Liverpool we have, (from a search result) – Some sources also point to the Royal Liver Building in Liverpool, which opened in 1911, as Britain’s first “true” skyscraper.
Are there issues with this building regarding when it was built? I am a Joiner by trade and when I look at these buildings close up, there is absolutely no sign whatsoever of any foundation settlement, no movement in the horizontal lie of the doors, windows and stonework, like you can often see in more modern buildings and the weight of the materials used is huge, yet no signs of any movement or settlement at all.
Below I have put a link to two images of the building, the top picture is dated 1925, just 14 years after construction was completed. What struck me was how dirty the building appears to be, it is almost black, (is this the result of exhausts from the many ships that used the river back then, could that dis colour the building in such a short period) instead of the white colour it is supposed to be.
The lower picture is dated as early 2020’s which is about 50 years after the building was last cleaned up in 1973 and it is nowhere near as dirty here after almost 50 years as it was just 14 years after it was first built ???
In the lower picture, just to the left and behind the Liver Building you can see a slightly smaller white building which is more like how the new/cleaned up building would have appeared.
As it appears in the top picture, is the building far older than we are told, it appears that way.
Something just not quite right here I feel.
https://tapnewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/LIVERBIRDS-3.jpg
Interesting Kneepad. All cities were cleaned up. I remember London being black in the 1960s, but looking beautiful by the 1990s. Fourteen years to go black is your question. The world was powered by coal and smog blackened buildings. In how long? Not sure I know. Liverpool is based on mud isn’t it – but that place must be solid rock?
From my understanding the Tartars were a Caucasian people who where ruled over by giants – the Nephilim of the Bible, hence the Serpent on their flag. Churches were meeting places and healing centres from the energy generated from their design, which have since been repurposed for the home of ritualistic worship pretending to be Christian!