The Jesuits

 Wed 1:01 pm +00:00, 26 Mar 2025  11

posted by pete fairhurst 2

Above is Ignatius Loyola the founder of the Jesuits

He is said to be a Basque Spaniard but what does he look like to you?

Have a good look, does he look Spanish?

I’m putting this post up for consideration after Joshua and newensign’s recent discussions

I’ve no axe to grind…..

I’ve posted the first few pages from this article from 2021, plenty more at this link

Source: https://mileswmathis.com/jesuit.pdf

First published November 25, 2021

This is by request. I have already touched on the Jesuits many times, and my readers should already
know my overall opinion on the subject, which will not change here. We have already seen Disraeli
admitting the Jesuits were Jews, so I have read that as a simple infiltration, going way back—even
before the Jesuits. We have seen the Papacy already infiltrated before Loyola, by the Medicis, Borgias,
and other Jewish popes. In that light, the Jesuits were just these noble families cementing their hold on
Rome and Europe by establishing their own specialized monks and monasteries.

I often get angry emails from people screaming that the Jesuits are behind the Jews, but of course that
is upside down, I assume on purpose. The Jews have tried to deflect blame onto the Jesuits, but as you
will see, that doesn’t fly. The Jews were around and running their projects long before anyone had
heard of the Jesuits. According to my extensive research, no one is crouching behind the Jews, except
maybe the Phoenicians. But since I use the two terms pretty much interchangeably, that also doesn’t
deflect blame. It is two names for the same people, so in pointing at the Phoenicians I am not pointing
away from the Jews. The Jews are just neo-Phoenicians.

In researching this latest paper, I ran across a book I didn’t previously know about, entitled The Jesuit
Order as a Synagogue of Jews. It was published in 2010 by Robert Aleksander Maryks. At first you
might think this is a bold outing of the Jesuits, but it isn’t. Like When Scotland was Jewish, it only
seems to be spilling the beans. Both are actually opposition control, released by the Jews themselves.
We already saw that with the latter book, which was written by two authors who admit they are Jewish.
And it is the same with Robert Maryks. Did he fool you with that name? Try spelling it Marx.
Maryks is an assistant professor at Boston College, so you can be sure he isn’t doing anything
revolutionary here. If he did any real research they would fire him immediately. The book was
published under the auspices of The Studies in Medieval and Reformation Traditions, which appears to
be founded, edited, and overseen by Jews. Maryks actually thanks a Borja in his acknowledgments.
We see what they are up to very fast in the long introduction, where they admit what is already known:
the first Jesuits, including Loyola, were conversos or crypto-Jews, from noble and wealthy families.
But then Maryks tries to convince us that although it was OK to be a Jesuit Jew from 1540 to 1593,
after 1593 (see p. 117) the Jesuits were cleansed of Jewish blood from within, by new rules forbidding
it. That isn’t believable on the face of it, so we should look closely at Maryks’ evidence. Does he prove
it or even indicate it? No, he just says it.

But let’s back up. In order to build street cred in the run up to that argument, Maryks admits the first
Jesuits were Jews. Disraeli and many others, including other prominent Jews and rabbis, have already
admitted it, so Maryks isn’t telling us anything we don’t already know. But as part of building his cred,
he does go into a bit more deeply than others before him, showing a lot of evidence they were Jewish.
So this should interest us, and does. It probably explains why the book—although prepared as
controlled opposition by the Jews themselves—was soon pulled from the shelves. It is almost
impossible to buy, being out of print and going for hundreds of dollars online.

My link above goes to Veteran’s Today from 2018, where Gordon Duff is recommending the book.
Also for street cred, I assume. And also to sell you the idea the Jesuits were only Jews before 1593.

So let’s look at the first Jesuits. The first one I will look at is very easy, that being Alfonso Salmeron.
You can tell he is Jewish just from the name. Salermon=Salmon=Salomon=Solomon. Also see his
picture, which is easy to read. A preternaturally long hook nose and no cross around his neck. But if
that kind of evidence offends you, I send you to Maryks, who gives you much more. Salmeron was
from Toledo, where his family were known Jews of longstanding and huge wealth. If you search for
him in Maryks’ book online, good luck. The important things don’t come up either on an internal
search (cntl F) or in the index

So I will just give you the hint: go to the footnote of page 55, where Maryks admits many Jewish historians have admitted Salermon is Jewish, including Friedman, GomezMenor, and Salvador.

Toledo had been a Jewish stronghold for many centuries, being run by Phoenicians back to Roman
times. Back then they were known as Carpetians, and by the 1st century AD Toledo already had the
largest Roman circus in Spain. By the third century it was already a favored town of the wealthiest in
that region, due to its use as a trade and banking center (and being on a pretty hill surrounded by
rivers*). We are supposed to believe these people running Toledo in those years were Goths, ie
wildmen of the north, but there is no evidence of that. Like the Vikings, they have been sold as
something they weren’t. Most likely they were northern Phoenicians battling with their southern
cousins. If they had been wildmen they couldn’t have competed with the Romans. It is admitted that
the Jews were in Toledo from the beginning, but we are supposed to believe they were oppressed by
the Goths and then the Moors and all along by the Christians. The usual story. The usual flip of
history.