Odessa assassination analysed
Sat 11:06 am +00:00, 15 Mar 2025The assassin was a Ukrainian wounded in the war.
He killed the man responsible for the notorious act of burning Russians in a locked building in Odessa before the war started.
Dima gives all the details of who these characters were/are.
It doesn’t sound very political when the details are described.
The assassin’s son was forcibly sent to war and killed in the war, despite the father’s offer to go to war in his son’s place.
The man he killed was the one who tortured his son and forced him to go to war.
This version of events will not be visible in the media.
Trump asked ror lives of the Uktainians trapped in Kursk to be saved, and not slaughtered.
The Russians said that if they surrender, their lives will be spared.
They have two days to decide which way they want to play it.
Ukraine will never make an order for their soldiers to surrender.
It will be down to each soldier.
This war has a long way to run, and Trump will have much difficulty with it as the British attempt to assume the leadership role for the Americans.
English Independence would unravel the knot, and bring peace. Once people clock it that Farage is wasting their time as he usually does.
