The Atomic [not nuclear] Physics of Oreshnik

Source, paywall: https://boosty.to/cluborlov/posts/76c18bbb-5c8a-4a21-873c-946d645f995f?isFromFeed=true

Take a copper coil, mount it on a shaft and connect both ends to brushes sliding on ring contacts connected to an ammeter. Spin up the coil using a high speed electric motor, then abruptly stop it. At that exact moment, the ammeter will record a short but perfectly detectable pulse of electric current. Where does this current come from, given that there is nothing in this setup that produces an electromotive force?
The answer is that it comes from electron inertia. In a metal, electrons can be figuratively imagined to form an electron liquid sloshing around between the atomic nuclei of the metal’s crystal lattice. When the coil is spun up, they gain speed together with the protons and the neutrons forming the atomic nuclei. Unlike the nuclei, they are not bound to the crystal lattice and can travel some distance by inertia after the object is abruptly stopped. (For those who forgot, inertia is mass times velocity: p=mv.) Since electrons are (negatively) charged, they generate an electric current when they move. This is what the ammeter registers when the rotation of the coil is stopped.
It doesn’t take much electron motion to produce a large effect. At an electric current density of 10 amperes per square millimeter, the electrons drift through a copper wire at just 1 millimeter per second, but this is sufficient to melt the wire. Now imagine the effect if the speed is not 1 millimeter but 3 kilometers per second (or Mach 10), which is 3000000 times faster, as is the case when the warhead of an Oreshnik missile slams into the ground. Hard to imagine?
Here is a hint: the metal will explode.
But that’s not all.
The stability of a metal crystal lattice is preserved by the equilibrium of the Coulomb forces between the positive ions of the atomic nuclei and the surrounding negatively charged “electron liquid” of free electrons. Now imagine that all the free electrons have escaped. What happens to the atomic nuclei of the metal once the force holding them within the crystal structure disappears is that they all begin to repel each other and an explosion occurs.
Around a century ago it was noticed that when a fast-flying lead bullet or shell hits steel armor, it releases an amount of heat many times greater than the kinetic energy of the projectile (which is half the mass times its velocity squared, E_k=1/2 mv^2) — enough heat to burn a hole right through a steel plate. The reason for this anomaly is the same: electron inertia.
The binding energy in the crystal lattice of metals is approximately twice as large as that released during the explosive oxidation of TNT. At first glance, the explosion should not be much larger than that produced by a conventional explosive — about twice as large. The difference is that the time it takes to release this energy is hundreds of times shorter than during the chemical oxidation reaction in TNT and the energy from it is much more concentrated. Because of this, the destructive power of a Coulomb explosion can be 1000 times greater than that of a conventional explosive. Of course, this is not a nuclear explosion: no atomic nuclei are in any way damaged during this experiment. But it is comparable in its effects, which are much greater than what can be achieved using TNT.
For a bit of perspective, consider that 1 kg of uranium-235 can in theory (if every single atom of it undergoes nuclear fission) result in an explosion equivalent to 20 million kg of TNT. In reality, uranium is never enriched to 100% U-235 (anything above 90% is considered weapons-grade) and only a few percent of the U-235 have time to participate in a nuclear chain reaction before the whole contraption blows up. More realistically, a 1 kg nuclear charge is equivalent to about a million kg of TNT (or 1 kiloton). Meanwhile, 1 kg of metal in a Coulomb explosion will release energy equivalent to about a thousand kg of TNT (or 1 tonne). Nevertheless, these are still huge numbers.
And now we can address the question of what Oreshnik most likely is. Here is what has been publicly announced about it:
Warhead temperature: 4000ºC
Speed: Mach 10 (2.5–3 km/s)
Mass of warhead: ~1.5 tonnes
Perusing Dmitry Mendeleev’s Periodic Table of Elements we find just one candidate for warhead metal: tungsten. It melts at 3422ºC and boils at 5555ºC. Taking the mass of the warhead (which, we assume for the sake of simplicity, consists entirely of a single shaped piece of tungsten) at 1,500 kg, it produces the equivalent of 1,500,000 kg of TNT or 1,5 kilotons — a respectable amount for a small tactical nuke.
But there is more: unlike a nuke, which explodes prior to impact (or it smashes into little bits and just makes a big mess) and expends only some of its energy on producing a destructive shockwave while much of the rest radiates out as heat, heating the atmosphere, the stratosphere and outer space, the tungsten warhead penetrates the ground to a maximum depth given its momentum (E_k = 1,613 kg of TNT) and only then does it explode, producing the equivalent of a very short highly localized and intense earthquake. The effect at ground zero is that the ground and anything on it or in it is turned to fine dust. This is what was reported to have happened at Yuzhmash factory near Dniepropetrovsk, which the Russians had used as an Oreshnik test range.
Thus, Oreshnik is not a nuclear device, since no atomic nuclei are in any way damaged by its operation. It is, however, an atomic device because the basis of its explosive power is not chemistry (oxidation of TNT or some other explosive) but the atomic physics of a Coulomb explosion.
While this part of the Oreshnik story can be puzzled out based on the available evidence, other parts of it remain enigmatic. Specifically, it remains a well guarded secret how Oreshnik can precisely maneuver its warheads as they approach the target. Another well guarded secret is how the warhead manages to penetrate the atmosphere at Mach 10 without burning up. Nobody else has anything even remotely similar to these two technological advances and the Russian military is unlikely to divulge them any time soon — at least not before coming up with an even more awesome weapon.
Share this

3 Responses to “The Atomic [not nuclear] Physics of Oreshnik”

  1. ian says:

    Sounds like something that it’s best to avoid standing under.

  2. pete fairhurst 2 says:

    lol

    That reminds me of a story by an old mate of mine back in the’70’s. He was a professional comedian on the Northern club circuit with his brother. He told me about an incident that he’d had in Scotland, Inverness I think

    Said that they’d had a great night in a club there and were driving back to their base using back roads, having had one too many in the club for the main roads. When they came across a really old car in the road, actually half of a really old car. So they stopped and found the other half at the side of the road with a drunken Scotsman still sat in the drivers seat

    They went over to the wreck fearing the worst but saw that he looked ok and said to him, “You alright mate?

    His legendary reply was “One minute I was in the car, next minute I was oot of it”

    • ian says:

      Aye there’s lots of funny folks. I worked with an old guy, ex army and quite a sergeant major type man. His car was stolen. He said, “I went oot o ma house to get in the car, and there it was, gone”. He was called Maxie, I often think of him, he had a great many good points.

Need Reliable & Affordable Web Hosting?

The Tap is very happy to recommend Hostarmada.

HostArmada - Affordable Cloud SSD Web Hosting

Videos and Lectures from Pierre Sabak

In this new series of videos Pierre Sabak takes a deep dive into Alien Abductions, Language and Memory.

Descendant of a Cog - Deep Dive

Get Instant Access

To access the please choose the duration, click the BUY NOW button on the video player and purchase a ticket. Once you have made your purchase, you will be sent an automatic email confirmation with your access code details. This will give you unlimited access 24/7 to the recordings during your viewing period. You can watch the presentations on this page. Important: Please check your spam folder after your purchase, as sometimes the confirmations go to spam. If you don't receive your code within 15 mins, please contact us. You can access the video as soon as you receive your access code, which typically arrives in minutes. If you have any problems or questions about entering your password and accessing the videos, we have a help page. Secure Payment: Payment is taken securely by Stripe or PayPal. If you experience problems, please contact Pierre.

Watch on Pierre's Website

You can also watch on www.pierresabak.com