Kamala Harris is Mostly White and her genealogy proves it
Mon 12:21 pm +01:00, 30 Sep 2024Kamala reminds me of Meghan Markle, said to be black but certainly doesn’t look black
Don’t believe your lying eyes, believe what we say
To see all the photos and links visit: https://mileswmathis.com/kamala.pdf
Quote from below:
“Her grandmother is Margaret Welche, whose mother is Elline Seymour. She is of THE Seymours and Greys, putting Kamala in the DIRECT line of the Duke Edward Seymour, the Duke Henry Grey, the Princess Mary Tudor, and King Henry VII Tudor:
Since Mary Tudor married Louis, King of France, Kamala is also a 16g-granddaughter of Louis XII.
Wow. Chew on that a while”
So she’s descended from European Royalty then, just like all the others
by Miles Mathis
First published August 5, 2024
If anyone cares about the truth anymore, this is it. There is the usual hubbub in the news, with both
sides avoiding all facts, but although Kamala is part Indian on her mother’s side and part black on her
father’s side, if you add up totals she is more white than anything else. And the white lines are heavily
Jewish, as we would expect from someone who likes to marry Jews like this guy:
That’s Doug Emhoff young. Almost no one knows the “second gentleman” of the US is Jewish.
You should be able to tell Kamala is mainly white/Jewish just from looking at her, or noticing her
promotion, but most people’s eyes aren’t too good so let’s be scientific about it and look at bloodlines.
Master genealogist Tim Dowling has it all laid out for us on his huge site. He isn’t hiding it and so the
truth is easy to find. Which makes it amazing that no mainstream reporters can seem to locate it.
Let me simplify it for you. Jewish we will count as white. So, say she is half white on both sides. In
that case she is in total half white, a quarter black, and a quarter Indian. So twice as white as anything
else. If she were only 1/3rd white on both sides, she would still be as much white as anything, being
1/3rd white, 1/3rd black and 1/3rd Indian. So she would have to be only ¼ white on both sides for her to
be predominantly non-white.
Snopes has already conceded her mother is half-white, being listed as Caucasian on Kamala’s birth
certificate. So let’s do a little simple math. How white does she now need to be on her father’s side, to
make her mostly white? Well, that gives us this equation:
¼ + x = 1/3
That gives us 1/12th, but that is total. So we must double it to get her paternal side: if she is more than
1/6th white on her paternal side, she is white. Meaning, if we go back a few generations and find at
least 1 of 6 ancestors are white on that side, our job is done.
As it turns out, that is quite easy to do, since her Jamaican father is listed as Jamaican instead of black
for a reason: he mostly comes from Jamaican slave owners, who were white. And Jewish. Again, you
can tell that just by looking at him:
Amazingly, they have scrubbed that picture and all others from his Wiki page.
But we are being scientific here, and mainstream scientists don’t accept visual evidence, since they are
not visual. The boys in the barbershop can see this, but mainstream scientists can’t. So let’s return to
the genealogy. Even in the Harris line, Kamala Harris isn’t black. The Harrises come from Samuel
Constantine Harris. Note the Phoenician name Constantine. These Harrises came over to Jamaica
from Ireland in the 1700s, and they were closely related to Watsons, Grahams, Wallaces, Townshends,
and Roberts. They were not slaves, they were slaveowners, as you can see here. That is ucl.ac.uk, in
case it gets memoryholed. University College London, list of British slaveowners. More than that,
they were slave traders. The names Graham and Townshend indicates they were peers. Nobles. The
Townshends were and are Jewish/Phoenician peers, see Pete Townshend for your visual here:
If you will remember, Pete beat a pedophilia rap by claiming he was doing research. Wiki mentions
the case, but totally whitewashes it for Pete.
In about 1900 one of these Harrises married a Christiana Brown Chrishy. Was she black? Only half,
since her grandfather was Col. Hamilton Brown, another white slave trader from Ireland:
He founded Hamilton Town, now Brown’s Town. Dowling tells us his wife was a slave, but she
doesn’t have a slave’s name: Kate Williams. So more likely she was an indentured servant from
Ireland. Thousands of them were going to Jamaica at that time. Plus, I don’t trust that photo of
Christiana that I got from Geneanet. Look closely at her head: it has been repainted. Especially bad
are her hair and her chin. I think they were trying to make her look more black. At any rate, her
husband Joseph Alexander Harris looked like this:
Not black. Jewish, as I said.
Next, the Harrises marry the Finegans, in about 1945. Was this Beryl Finegan black? No more than
half, because her father was Patrick Alhanasous Finegan, yet another Irish slaver. Alhanasous is
another Phoenician pointer, probably a slur or misspelling of Athanasius. His mother was Mary
Graham Watson, Graham and Watson being two more big peerage names from Scotland
MyHeritage posts that picture of Beryl, but we have no reason to trust it. MyHeritage has multiple
listings for her, in one she is Beryl Harris nee Finegan, and in another she is Beryl Finegan nee
Christie. Tim Dowling confirms Christie as her maiden name and has added that photo since this paper
was first published (along with several others), but then he tells us her father was Finegan. So that
makes no sense. It looks to me like her second husband was Finegan, not her father. So there is a lot
of misdirection here.
In fact, I could only confirm one black person among Kamala’s eight great-grandparents. That would
be Orah Allen, whom we have a trustworthy picture of. Even she is probably half white, since her
father is listed as John Isaacs Allen—a Jewish name. But if even one of Kamala’s four paternal greatgrandparents are white, we would be above 1/6th, proving she is mostly white. I just proved that and
more than that.
So all this fluff about Kamala being a DEI hire is the usual misdirection. She didn’t get where she is by being black or Indian or even a woman. She got there by being of these old families like the Hamiltons and Grahams and Wallaces, that is, by being a Phoenician. There is no inclusion, the diversity is a mirage, and forget about equity or fairness. If you are from the Families, you get promotion whether you deserve it or not, and if you aren’t you get buried, slandered, and ignored. And even if you are from the Families, you have to do what you are told or you will be thrown unceremoniously from the bus. Which I highly recommend you do, since the bus has always been on a glittering road to nowhere.
Added September 26, 2024: I just watched Candace Owens’ video from today, where she continues
my investigation into this. She finds a second wife for Kamala’s paternal grandfather Oscar Harris, a
white woman named Vioris Cambridge, suggesting this may be Kamala’s actual grandmother, rather
than Beryl Finegan. But we already knew about Vioris from the link to Geneanet above, where she is
clearly listed. Tim Dowling isn’t hiding it. But Candace does get us restarted by republishing this
picture from Kamala’s own book:
I have posted it really big so you can study it closely. That is supposed to be Kamala’s Indian mother
(looking at least half-white or Hispanic), Kamala, and her paternal grandfather Oscar. Oscar doesn’t
look black at all, does he? Again, more like Hispanic/Cuban. But that’s not why we are here.
IT’S A PASTE!
As usual, that picture is a fake. It has been pasted together from three photos. They are all in a
different light, and that is especially obvious with the baby Kamala, since she is way blown out. See
how she is about ten shades lighter than the other two people, like a 1000-watt bulb is right on her?
Her forward arm looks really strange, since it is so blown out it has almost disappeared in white. You
will say it is because Kamala is getting reflected light from the white gown she is wearing. Except that
her mother is right next to her, just a few inches away, but the gown is not blowing her out in the same
way. The gown should be acting like an actual reflector, lighting up her mother’s dark side. But it isn’t.
Her mom has normal shadows on that side. That’s why the picture looks so weird at a glance. Even the
background looks fake, like a greenscreen. All the edges where the figures meet the background look
unnatural.
So what are they hiding? Is that even Kamala? I think so, since she has a strange right ear. See how it
is pointed? She never shows her ears now, and that is why:
The baby picture is from 1965, so Oscar would be 51, which looks about right. So again, I don’t know
what they are hiding or trying to prove with the paste. The only reason I can see is that they are trying
to sell us that Cuban-looking guy as Oscar when it isn’t him. They have replaced him because his real
looks would be a dead give-away.
We already have confirmation of that from that wedding photo Candace found of Oscar and Vioris.
Other than the bald head, I don’t really see a match to the Cuban Oscar. Regardless, you can see they
both look very upperclass. They don’t look like poor Jamaicans, do they? So let’s work on that
assumption.
I did discover many things Candace didn’t, starting with this:
That’s from the cache of pages at Geneanet I link to above. Look closely. Oscar Harris was aka. . .
Oscar Wilde. What! That’s because Oscar Harris isn’t his birth name. He was born Oscar Wilde
Brown. So why was he named for his mother? The usual reason, we suppose: his parents weren’t
married at his birth, since his father was probably not an “agricultural exporter” but a slaver. The
goods he was exporting were slaves. And Christiana Brown was possibly a slave.
But we have even more misdirection, since Christiana’s birthname wasn’t Brown, either. It was
Chrishy. The name in italics is the birthname at Geneanet. So Oscar’s birthname should be Oscar
Wilde Chrishy? Dowling actually has two pages for Oscar, and on the other one Wilde is the last name
in italics, so a lot of stirring is going on over there. I now think both the name and the picture are
wrong, meant to misdirect us.
And we see even more stirring: Christiana’s mother-in-law was named. . . Elizabeth Brown. So
although I don’t think Christiana’s maiden name was Brown, if it was it indicates she married a cousin
as well.
The other big thing Candace missed is that Tim Dowling admits Oscar never married Kamala’s
grandmother:
That page is in French, but marie means married and relation means they only had a relationship.
Beryl did later marry Lawford Newland in 1944, when Kamala’s father Donald Harris was about six.
Oscar’s father Joseph Harris also did not marry Christiana Brown Chrishy, they also having only a
relationship.
Also interesting is that we hit the peerage Watsons of Perthshire, Scotland, twice in these pages, once
with Catherine Jane Watson, wife of 3g-grandfather Thomas Harris; and Mary Graham Watson, wife of
2g-grandfather Patrick Finegan.
Another thing Candace missed is the goldmine hiding behind Vioris Cambridge, Oscar’s second wife.
Not only was she white, she was the daughter of Vivian Stanley Cambridge. Sounds very aristocratic,
doesn’t he, since that is three peerage names stacked. He is well scrubbed, not appearing in the peerage
proper, but we can easily link him to the Stuarts anyway. Through the Parchments he links us to the
Saunders, whom we recognize from Frances Stonor Saunders. Ben Franklin was a Saunders. We also
link to Captain Andrew Bromfield, who links us to the Murrays of Scotland. Through the Cranstons
we then link to Elizabeth Stewart, whose great-grandfather was King James of Scotland, son of
Margaret Tudor. But Vioris isn’t just a royal Stuart in one line, she is a Stuart in several lines. Through
the Parchments again we soon hit Sarah Maitland. Dowling scrubs her, but the Maitlands are first
cousins of the royal Stuarts. Think of actor Jimmy Stewart, real name James Maitland Stewart.
So that brings up this very good question: how did Oscar Harris, Kamala’s non-black black grandfather
manage to marry a white Stuart from the royal house of Scotland? He would have to be from royal
lines himself, and we find without much effort that he was. In these same pages at Geneanet, we just
keep clicking on these Harrises, until we hit Mary Parsons in the 1700s
Her grandmother is Margaret Welche, whose mother is Elline Seymour. She is of THE Seymours and Greys, putting Kamala in the DIRECT line of the Duke Edward Seymour, the Duke Henry Grey, the Princess Mary Tudor, and King Henry VII Tudor:
Since Mary Tudor married Louis, King of France, Kamala is also a 16g-granddaughter of Louis XII.
Wow. Chew on that a while
It didn’t take much work to discover that, since it is all up at Geneanet
and only requires a couple of dozen clicks. So it is sort of strange that Candace and her team missed it.
So not only is Kamala’s Jamaican line barely black, it actually leads straight to the white Kings of
England and France.
So what else does that tell us? Well, it tells us that Kamala’s grandfather Oscar Wilde is probably
really related to the famous Oscar Wilde, and may even resemble him. That is probably why they had
to paste someone else into Kamala’s baby photos. As we saw in my paper on Wilde, he was from these
same lines, being a Graham, a Murray, a Stanley, and a Stewart. Wilde’s wife Constance Lloyd was a
Watson. And remember, Oscar Wilde had a son named. . . Vyvyan. Vyvyan=Vivian, which we just
saw with Vivian Stanley Cambridge. So something is going on here we aren’t being told. There is still
a mystery I haven’t solved.
So let’s keep working on it. Constance Lloyd wasn’t just a Watson, she was a Stanhope and Fitzroy,
making her a direct descendant of King Charles II. Tim Dowling of Geneanet is also a 7th cousin of
these people through the Clintons. This links us to the Seymours in about 1700, so we have found a
hard link between Oscar Wilde’s wife and Oscar Harris through the Seymours. Still, that doesn’t really
explain why Oscar Harris was named for Oscar Wilde, since the link isn’t that close. There is some
closer link and I suspect it is through the Watsons of Perthshire, Scotland, since that would give us a
link around 1900. But given all the scrubbing in these recent lines, the solution may not be available
online.
