One Health funds virus development. …germ warfare.

Mon 7:53 am +00:00, 15 May 2023

posted by Tapestry

One Health is also a funding stream for collecting viruses for GOF research. And USAID is a big funder; isn’t USAID another name for CIA? Isn’t Gain of Function another name for Germ Warfare?

Enter Jonna Mazet, a very close colleague of Peter Daszak and prof at UC Davis. She ran the Predict project to trap wild viruses and send them back to DOD’s DTRA for further investigation, etc.

MERYL NASS

MAY 15

Here is her bio at the Global Virome Project that she, Daszak and Dennis Carroll dine off. Why WOULDN’T you use One Health to prepare our future pandemics? Might as well fund the two conspiracies with one pot of our dough.

https://www.globalviromeproject.org/who-we-are/leadership/jonna-mazet

JONNA MAZET is a member and Implementation Director of the Global Virome Project Leadership Board. Jonna is a Professor of Epidemiology and Disease Ecology at the UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine and Executive Director of the UC Davis One Health Institute. Her work focuses on global health problem solving for emerging infectious diseases and conservation challenges. She is active in international One Health education, service, and research programs, most notably in relation to pathogen emergence; disease transmission among wildlife, domestic animals, and people; and the ecological drivers of novel disease dynamics.

[You know what pathogen emergence means: spillover, pandemics occur naturally. “Ecological drivers of novel disease dynamics” means climate change causes pandemics. Sorry if I am repeating myself, but these are the fairy tales leading us to the one world government.]

Currently, Jonna is the Co-Director of the US Agency for International Development’s One Health Workforce – Next Generation, an $85 million educational strengthening project to empower professionals in Central/East Africa and Southeast Asia to address complex and emerging health threats, including antimicrobial resistance and zoonotic diseases. She is the Principal Investigator of and served as the Global Director of PREDICT Project for 10 years, a greater than $200 million viral emergence early warning project under USAID’s Emerging Pandemic Threats Division. PREDICT served as an early-warning system-strengthening effort aimed at finding emerging viruses before they spread to humans. Since 2009, PREDICT has empowered partners in over 30 countries to deploy a One Health approach for zoonotic disease prevention, detection, and response, including supporting 60 laboratories in the world’s most risky areas for spillover to be able to do virus discovery. [Enabling the cheaper locals to do the initial lab work before we get the best viruses for GOF development. GOF used to be called biological warfare.] Our teams have collected and tested samples from over 164,000 animals and people and detected almost 1,200 potentially zoonotic viruses, among them 160 novel coronaviruses, including multiple SARS- and MERS-like coronaviruses. PREDICT provided the proof-of-concept for the Global Virome Project.

Jonna was elected to the US National Academy of Medicine in 2013 in recognition of her successful and innovative approach to emerging environmental and global health threats and serves on the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine’s Forum on Microbial Threats and chairs the Academies’ One Health Action Collaborative. She was appointed to the National Academies Standing Committee on Emerging Infectious Diseases and 21st Century Health Threats, which was created to assist the federal government with critical science and policy issues related to the COVID-19 crisis and other emerging health threats.

And guess what? The Global Virome Project [to produce viruses for the next pandemic] is supported by Tedros and friends at WHO through the Trinity Challenge—in which Daszak, Mazet and friends wants donors and partners to fund them to keep catching viruses for fun and profit. You can watch Tedros and a bunch of other folks mouth platitudes about how important it is to ‘do something’ so it never happens again, here. I can’t embed the video, so I will just give you a screenshot.

You’re currently a free subscriber to Meryl’s COVID Newsletter. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.

Open in app or online

What is One Health?–check out what the One Health Commission has to say about it

It’s everything and nothing–but it lassos everything in the world and puts a noose around our necks. And compliance is baked into the 2023 NDAA.

MERYL NASS

MAY 15

What is the definition of One Health? Well, apparently there were 60 different definitions so the One Health High Level Expert Panel came up with a final definition. [Not just ordinary experts but high level experts were needed to craft a definition that could be used to gain sovereignty over everything.] We examine who these high level experts are at the end of this substack. Their One Health definition:

One Health is an integrated, unifying approach that aims to sustainably balance and optimize the health of people, animals and ecosystems. It recognizes the health of humans, domestic and wild animals, plants, and the wider environment (including ecosystems) are closely linked and inter-dependent.

The approach mobilizes multiple sectors, disciplines and communities at varying levels of society to work together to foster well-being and tackle threats to health and ecosystems, while addressing the collective need for clean water, energy and air, safe and nutritious food, taking action on climate changes and contributing to sustainable development. [I guess that means they will tackle the changing climate whether it heats up or cools down?]

https://www.onehealthcommission.org/en/why_one_health/what_is_one_health/

Scope of One Health

Some people misunderstand and think that One Health is about everything therefore ii must be about nothing. But the truth is that One Health thinking (see definition above) and implementation is needed in so many arenas [???] that it just seems to be about ‘everything’.

Because of the inextricable interconnectedness of animal, environmental, human, plant and planet health, here are a few areas that urgently need the One Health approach, at all levels of academia, government, industry, policy and research:

Agricultural production and land use

Animals as Sentinels for Environmental agent and contaminants detection and response

Antimicrobial resistance mitigation

Biodiversity / Conservation Medicine

Climate change and impacts of climate on health of animals, ecosystems, and humans

Clinical medicine needs for interrelationship between the health professions

Communications and outreach

Comparative Medicine: commonality of diseases among people and animals such as cancer, obesity, and diabetes

Disaster preparedness and response

Disease surveillance, prevention and response, both infectious (zoonotic) and chronic / non-communicable diseases

Economics / Complex Systems, Civil Society

Environmental Health

Food Safety and Security

Global trade, commerce and security

Human – Animal bond

Natural Resources Conservation

Occupational Health Risks

Plant / Soil health

Professional education and training of the Next Generation of One Health professionals

Public policy and regulation

Research, both basic and translational

Vector-Borne Diseases

Water Safety and Security

Welfare / Well-being of animals, humans, ecosystems and planet

https://www.who.int/groups/one-health-high-level-expert-panel/members

One wonders how many billions of taxpayer dollars were spent to get so many people to spout this gobbeldygook. I listened to a 5 minute talk from an academic at the Harvard Wang School of Public Health (HWSPH) which was full of meaningless jargon… and then I recalled what a former classmate, who was a professor at the HWSPH had told me. The School of Public Health doesn’t guarantee their staff a salary. You have to earn your own salary from grants you obtain, or you don’t get paid. A perfect setup for the One Health mavens: spout our nonsense and keep getting the grants. Stop and you could be bounced out of public health.

Here is more from the same website. WHO is that sitting on top of the world?:

One Health is a global ‘Paradigm’ for challenge driven ‘Teamwork’.

The One Health paradigm forges co-equal, all-inclusive collaborations between animal, plant, environmental and human health arenas, i.e. chemical, engineering and social scientists, dentists, nurses, agricultural/ horticulturalists and food producers, wildlife and environmental health specialists and many other related disciplines that fall under its purview.

Teamwork. Collaborations. But what is the goal? That is never specified. Here is another one from the same website, so over-the-top it makes you cringe:

What is the ray of hope? What benefits does the one health approach convey? All the articles and websites are short on results. They are long on including the entire planet, though. Below: give us money for capacity building, and we will give you the Garden of Eden. All we have to do is work together, sprinkle some fairy dust, and off to the Garden we go.

Who are those high level experts? One (Cathy Machalaba) was appointed to be a high level expert the year she got her Ph.D. Her high level expertise was working for Peter Daszak at EcoHealth Alliance. Another, Marion Koopmans, was on the WHO COVID origins team that went to China and discovered frozen food, along with Peter Daszak. She also was on the call with Tony Fauci and Jeremy Farrar on Feb 1 to cook up an alibi for the origin of COVID. George Gao, who was head of China’s CDC and is a friend of Jeremy Farrar is another. Casey Barton Behravesh is the head of CDC’s One Health program, and has made One Health her career, as has Cathy Machalaba. Behravesh helps manage One Health at international agencies—keeping everyone on the same page, presumably.

https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/who-we-are/index.html

TAP – This means aspiring to be the world’s sole government.

Letter from LaLaLand to Dr. Ladapo, signed by FDA’s Califf and CDC’s Walensky

Everything is great, we are thrilled with our vaccines and the only problem is not enough people are up to date, so stop the misinformation already, got it?

MERYL NASS

11 MAR 2023

267

232

Don’t read this if you get upset easily.

https://www.fda.gov/media/166159/download

March 10, 2023

“…Serious adverse events from COVID-19 vaccines are rare and are far outweighed by the benefits of these vaccines for every age group. The claim that the increase of VAERS reports of life-threatening conditions reported from Florida and elsewhere represents an increase of risk caused by the COVID-19 vaccines is incorrect, misleading and could be harmful to the American public. The FDA-approved and FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccines have met FDA’s rigorous scientific and regulatory standards for safety and effectiveness and these vaccines continue to be recommended for use by CDC for all people six months of age and older. Both FDA and CDC have continued to collect outcome data from multiple sources that demonstrate the clear benefit of COVID-19 vaccines in preventing death, serious illness, and hospitalization from SARS-CoV-2 infection, along with indicating a modest benefit in the prevention of infection and transmission that wanes over time, even as new variants have emerged. Additional benefits include a reduced risk of known complications from SARS-CoV-2 infection, including post-COVID conditions, COVID-19-associated stroke and heart disease, and COVID-19-induced venous thromboembolism.

…Additionally, not only is there no evidence of
increased risk of death following mRNA vaccines, but available data have shown quite the opposite: that being up to date on vaccinations saves lives compared to individuals who did not get vaccinated. Multiple well conducted, peer-reviewed, published studies here and here demonstrate that the risk of death, serious illness and hospitalization is higher for unvaccinated individuals for every age group. Because we are not the only country in the world using COVID-19 vaccines, we also benefit from the experience of other countries. More than 13 billion doses
of COVID-19 vaccines have been given around the world, including hundreds of millions of doses of mRNA vaccines and hundreds of millions of doses to children. Consistent with our data, these multiple international partners have robust monitoring for both safety and effectiveness. They find little evidence of widespread adverse events, also detect rare events as we do, and conclude that the benefits of the vaccines generally far outstrip their risks.

…The most recent estimate is that those who are up to date on their vaccination status have a 9.8 fold lower risk of dying from COVID-19 than those who are unvaccinated and 2.4 fold lower risk of dying from Covid-19 than those who were vaccinated but had not received the updated, bivalent vaccine.

Unfortunately, the misinformation about COVID-19 vaccine safety has caused some
Americans to avoid getting the vaccines they need to be up to date. This has led to
unnecessary death, severe illness and hospitalization. These tragic outcomes not only have a devastating effect on individuals and their families, but they also create a tremendous strain on our healthcare systems and clinicians, potentially compromising care for other patients…