Phone system scammers are pretending to be BT
Sat 1:37 pm +00:00, 24 Jan 2026 1
On Tuesday I met a gentleman in the sales office at Curteis Ltd who was with our Accounts Director. I, the Managing Director, founder and owner of Curteis Ltd asked him directly if he was from BT in front of the Accounts Director and the Marketing Director, who was with me. He replied with a single word ‘YES’.
As we have a long history going back decades of dealing with BT, I was happy for the Accounts Director to discuss the matters of our phone system problems with him.
This deception is not only a misrepresentation. It is also potentially a criminal act as it was clearly made with an intention to obtain a pecuniary advantage, under Sections 11 and 12 of the Theft Act. The matter should possibly be reported to the Police, and Trading Standards should certainly investigate what is happening here.
Obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception – (Theft Act 1968)
(1)A person who by any deception dishonestly obtains for himself or another any pecuniary advantage shall on conviction on indictment be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding five years.
(2)The cases in which a pecuniary advantage within the meaning of this section is to be regarded as obtained for a person are cases where—
(a)any debt or charge for which he makes himself liable or is or may become liable (including one not legally enforceable) is reduced or in whole or in part evaded or deferred; or
(b)he is allowed to borrow by way of overdraft, or to take out any policy of insurance or annuity contract, or obtains an improvement of the terms on which he is allowed to do so ; or
(c)he is given the opportunity to earn remuneration or greater remuneration in an office or employment, or to win money by betting.
(3)For purposes of this section ” deception ” has the same meaning as in section 15 of this Act.
For purposes of this section ” deception” means any deception (whether deliberate or reckless) by words or conduct as to fact or as to law, including a deception as to the present intentions of the person using the deception or any other person.
- “Fraud by false representation” is defined by Section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006 as a case where a person makes “any representation as to fact or law … express or implied” which they know to be untrue or misleading.













https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yg3y0qgexo
They have many companies, all look to be untrustworthy. All with the same directors.
This is the other telephone communication company they have.