You have to WATCH this – You will NEVER take another vaccine again or allow your family or pets to be vaccinated
Wed 1:33 pm +00:00, 15 Oct 2025 14
Source: https://mileswmathis.com/vax3.pdf
by Miles Mathis
October 13, 2025
This is a link to the VAXXED sequel by Del Bigtree called An Inconvenient Study. It is currently free to
watch. You will NEVER take another vaccine again or allow your family or pets to be vaccinated.
In brief, what it tells you is that, after more than a century, a major vaccinated v. unvaccinated study
was done by the mainstream (Dr. Marcus Zervos, Henry Ford Health Center) with a huge database of
18,500 patients over decades, and its finding was so contrary to the idea of vaccine safety it was pulled
from publication by its authors, Dr. Zervos stating on camera that his career would have been over had
he published it. Bigtree has now leaked the report via this film and the internet, also giving it to
Congress, and all hell is breaking loose.
This is because the study found unequivocally that the vaccinated are far sicker across the board,
having hugely elevated risks of autism, allergies, asthma, lupus, ADD, diabetes, and almost everything
else. And these risks aren’t just elevated by a few percentage points, they are elevated by many times.
In other words, your risk doesn’t rise by just 10% or 20%, it rises by something like 500%. Overall,
after five years, the risk was about 4 times worse for the vaccinated for chronic disease, which is a huge
increase. In addition, your risk of these things if you are unvaccinated is often . . . zero. In many
categories like ADD, they found zero outcomes for the unvaccinated, which didn’t even allow them to
do the math. You need at least one outcome in order to calculate a fraction or percentage, since you
can’t do a fraction with zero. If you use zero, you get an increased risk in vaccination of infinity.
Funny if it weren’t so tragic.
One thing this tells us is that the recent Trump/Kennedy press conference, blaming autism on Tylenol,
was the usual whitewash. Yes, it was a step in the right direction, and the nod to the Amish was
glorious, but Trump needs to do what Governor Ron DeSantis and his surgeon general in Florida are
doing, no longer recommending any vaccines. In fact, they need to go much further, outlawing all
vaccines as dangerous to the public weal. They then need to put all vaccine makers in receivership,
seize all assets, and arrest all the top officers as the criminals they are.
Without a revolution that is highly unlikely, since, if you will remember, Trump recently called the top
mass murderer at Pfizer, Albert Bourla, a “great great man”. And he has just invested billions of your
taxdollars in AstraZeneca, one of the most evil companies in the world.
I have previously expressed doubts about Bigtree, but if he is running opposition control he is doing a
very bad job of it. One thing that jumps out here is that he is still selling the idea vaccines are effective,
even if they aren’t safe. [Though we know from the Covid vaccine they aren’t effective at all.] That is
troubling because of course it leaves open the possibly they will claim to fix this safety issue, then push
a whole new round of novel vaccines on us. Perhaps Bigtree and his family and backers are invested in
that. In fact, near the end of this documentary, he says exactly that: he wants to fix the vaccine
program, not end it. Fix it how? By promoting a whole new slate of “new and improved” vaccines,
even more expensive due to the necessary trials, etc, ones that he will claim don’t have the side effects?
Yeah, right. Same thing they said about the “new and improved” mRNA faux-vaccines, which are
EVEN WORSE than the old vaccines.
But it is difficult to believe that vaccines could ever survive this publicity, in any form, since it makes
clear that the vaccine industry—and medical industry more broadly—has not only been a fraud and a
theft of taxpayer money, it has been a knowing genocide. Dr. Zervos feigns ignorance, not
convincingly, but he and most others in positions of power had to know what was going on. Ignorance
doesn’t begin to explain it. Which means people should never trust anything called a vaccine or even
resembling a vaccine ever again. They shouldn’t trust the CDC, the FDA, WHO, Congress, the
President, or their own doctors and veterinarians ever again. They should go Amish on this question
and never return.
I also note that Dr. McCullough, supposedly on our side here, says (min.1:00:29) that “despite the good
intentions of the field of vaccinology, that it’s backfiring on us”. You cannot be serious! If we have
learned anything in the past six years, it is that vaccinologists, doctors, and the government in general
do not have good intentions and never did. The clear intention of everyone concerned was and is to
make as much dirty money as possible, letting any amount of collateral damage slide, including a
genocide and mass poisoning.
McCullough hedges a second time in the video when he implies that only numbers over 4 are
significant here, since only then will other studies of the same sort likely tell us the same thing. That
isn’t really a hedge, it is just an outright lie. That is a 300% increase in risk, which is fantastically large
in a study of this nature. In a study done right and not fudged or pushed after the fact, all the numbers
are significant, with any number over about 1.5 being a gigantic red flag.
I also note that Bigtree tries to break the autism-vaccine connection, by pointing out this new study
only found 23 instances of autism. He takes that to mean there may not be a strong connection, but
what he fails to circle is that there was only 1 instance of autism among the non-vaccinated group,
which means the vaccinated were up to 9 times more likely to get autism (min. 1:01:43). Plus, autism is
a neurodevelopmental disorder, and the study has a separate line for that, showing an increased risk of
up to 11 times (min. 55:54). It may also be an autoimmune disorder, for which the study found an
increased risk up to 25 times (min. 55:30). Which tells me this study has still been fudged on the
autism line, by too narrowly defining it or something. Autism is very poorly defined and understood,
so it would be quite easy to create a false narrow definition that left out many cases. Besides, it is the
first place we would expect Zervos et al to fudge this data, isn’t it? So we should be most suspicious of
the numbers on that line.
In that way we see another possible use of Bigtree’s framing, in that he never states things as they beg
to be stated. He is always way too dispassionate, as all these slick films always are. Yes, he lets the
sad afflicted people speak for themselves, which is heartbreaking, but we are always expecting a
summation or call to arms we never get in these documentaries. This crime is so huge it calls for
nothing less than an immediate uprising. All these mass murderers should immediately be arrested and
tried for high crimes against humanity, convicted and thrown from some tall cliff into the sea, and good
riddance. These people shouldn’t fear for their jobs, they should fear for their lives in front of some
Nuremberg Court or Citizens Court. Anything short of that is just a slow walk.
Instead, Bigtree and the other “big heroes” of this documentary sum up by saying we need more
studies. More studies from Harvard and Kaiser Permanente and I guess Pfizer itself, years of studies to
prove what is already crystal clear—something we knew before we even saw this study from Henry
Ford “Health”, since we have eyes: the medical industry, led by the vaccine industry, is murdering us
for profit, and they couldn’t care less. If we didn’t know that before Covid and those deadly fauxvaccines, we know it now, and we don’t need even one more study to prove it. And while those new
fake studies are being done by entities profiting from this genocide, millions more children and other
innocents will be maimed or die, autism will go from 1 in 28 to 1 and ten and then 1 in four, and every
single person in the country will have diabetes, inflammation, and brain damage. We must all already
have brain damage, or it could not have come this far.
In conjunction with this new documentary, I refer you to last month’s Senate hearing, where Stanford
doctor Jake Scott arrived with 661 peer reviewed studies that allegedly proved the safety of childhood
vaccines. Unfortunately he ran into Del Bigtree’s attorney Aaron Siri, who had been brought in by the
other side, I assume Senator Ron Johnson. Under cross-examination, it turned out that exactly none of
these 661 studies was relevant, since they either weren’t done on childhood vaccines, didn’t have a
proper control group, or didn’t use a placebo. Meaning they were all paid for and rigged by Big
Pharma, just as you would expect. By the end it had gotten so ugly Scott was forced to admit he hadn’t
even looked at all the studies before including them.













I watched this yesterday and thought it was really good, although it covers some of the same ground as Vaxxed.
Of course everyone knows (including RFK) that childhood vaccines are responsible for the rise in autism, but they have to go after the low-hanging fruit first (i.e. paracetamol). Which is why the researcher here dare not publish his study.
I read and watch a lot of the stuff CHD puts out and it seems that more and more people are waking up to the dangers of vaccines, but I’m afraid we have a long way to go before big names dare to come out and say so publicly. Even Dr Wakefield, who simply suggested that more research should be done on the MMR and its connection to gut issues was hounded out of his job.
Dr Paul Thomas published a study on the vaxxed against unvaxxed in his practice and lost his licence over it. It’s really frustrating for those of us who know the truth, but if you go too fast, you end up with the opposite of the desired outcome.
Thoughtful comment, thanks Belyi
I have since read that RFK has been saying that circumcision has led to many cases of autism because of the paracetamol given to babies to relieve their agony. Not sure how far he will be allowed to go with this, although I read months ago that circumcising tiny babies causes a trauma that can lead to their becoming violent and aggressive adults.
I have direct personal experience that is relevant to your comment Belyi
For good reasons that I won’t go into here then, my wife and I decided that we wanted to circumcise our son. We could have gone to our doctor and the NHS. But, being that my wife is a Jew then, we consulted her parents and went to visit a Mohel [Rabbi who is an expert on circumcision] in a large northern city, when my son was 10 days old
We figured that was a less risky route, the Mohel was a true expert and it’s not a common practice in the NHS anymore
As the father it was my duty to attend the ceremony, even though I’m a goy, no women are allowed. So I saw the whole process from start to finish, after I handed my son on a pillow to the Mohel. I won’t go into detail but it was truly impressive. There was no trauma whatsoever, an initial squeak immediately after the act was pacified by the Mohel with his finger dipped in wine and used like a dummy. The first evening he was discomforted but only at the level of any tiny baby might be when put in their crib, that’s all
No signs of trauma whatsoever, no cries of pain, nothing. The small dressing was kept soaked in liquid paraffin oil, a Russian medicinal oil according to Wiki. We returned after 2 days for the dressing to be changed, I will say that his penis was quite a sight. After that we used the oil ourselves for a week or so. And that was it
I was an amazing experience and we were so pleased that we didn’t use the NHS
All this was nearly 40 years ago now. The young boy has become a fine upstanding man with not a trace of violence or aggression in his character whatsoever. The opposite in fact, he’s caring, sensitive, gentle, incredibly social and a natural diplomat too
I’m glad about that, Pete and it sounds much more hygienic than most of the circumcisions I’ve read about, with the rabbi sucking the child’s penis afterwards and possibly passing them some infection. There was a fairly well-known case of twins where the rabbi botched one of them and it was decided he had to be treated as a girl. In young adulthood, I believe he committed suicide.
When my friend’s son was 11, after many tries by the urologist, he had to have the operation, but it was done in a hospital with a proper anaesthetic and he spent the night there with his mum.
Pete, you sound like the person to tell me why this operation is carried out unless there are medical reasons for it.
I believe that Higher Intelligence got it right and we are born perfect, so why would this wonderful creation be butchered so shortly after birth?
I agree with you but, as I said above then, I don’t really want to go into our reasons
Suffice to say that they were rooted in previous experience, nothing religious, my wife had left the tribe by then. Purley practical precautionary reasons in other words
Further, we had no idea of those thoughts of yours at that time, nearly 40 years ago. And both my father and I were circumcised and didn’t discern any down side
My father’s trauma, which he handled very well all things considered, was generated by WW2. He drove a truck onto the beach on D day as a 24 year old. And then followed the front all the way to the end on Luneberg Heath
He saw Hamburg, which had been flattened by the Allies demonic “area bombing”, told me that “it smelled of death”. And Belsen too, he was on the scene there very early. Both traumatised him, for different reasons. Circumcision was the last of his worries
Pete. I wasn’t probing your reasons, I just wanted to know why this is something that is routinely carried out. Not being a man, I probably can’t understand the practical reasons for it, but I don’t believe the Higher Intelligence that conceived human beings got it so wrong that it has to be so rapidly put right.
Fair enough Belyi. But I can’t answer you, I’ve no idea. I’ve heard about hygiene and tight foreskins but nothing much else. I don’t think that it’s a big deal myself tbh. Never hampered me in anyway
So I asked AI why Jews circumcise and it gives historical religious reasons and also says
“While the original reason is religious, circumcision has also been associated (especially in modern times) with some health benefits, such as reduced risk of certain infections, though these are secondary and not the religious motivation.”
Thank you Pete and if it is an operation carried out in hygienic conditions with proper anaesthetic, then it may be necessary, as my friend’s 11 year-old son found.
If God needed the foreskin to not be there, he would reprogramme the human blueprint. It’s a torture of infants that nature does not require.
Thank you, Tap. I remember a conversation between a girl from an African country who had been circumcised (against her father’s wishes) who moved with her family to Kenya, I think, where it was not done and other girls pointed out the same thing: God did not create imperfect children who needed bits of their body mutilated.
Yes Belyi, particularly for females. Female circumcision is radical and totally life changing, it’s an abomination. Same basic principle for males but far far less damaging to their life
Actually, although it’s more radical for females, the principle is the same and many of these so-called religious circumcisions for boys are performed in less than ideal conditions. For girls, it has been outlawed everywhere so it’s always carried out in the most horrific way.