Perfect proof against Flat Earth and geocentrism

 Tue 7:38 pm +00:00, 4 Mar 2025  1

posted by pete fairhurst 2

Source: https://milesmathis.com/astro.pdf

Ian might enjoy this one from Mathis

Bold text is my emphasis

=========================

Why Mercury in Retrograde is a Real Thing

by Miles Mathis
First published October 7, 2021
Don’t worry, I am not going to argue that Mercury in retrograde is bad luck, something you need to
ward off with trinkets. I am going to show you why and how Mercury in retrograde is a real charge
phenomenon with real effects.

First of all, Mercury in retrograde is a real event, which astronomers admit and know about. It isn’t
something astrologers made up. It isn’t wuwu. However, it is just a line-of-sight event from the Earth,
caused by it seeming to us the Earth is not moving. Since we are on the Earth, we see the Earth as still
and everything else moving relative to us. Mercury never moves backward in any sense, or reverses
course. It only seems to from our perspective, due to circular motion in different orbits. It is also
perfect proof against Flat Earth and geocentrism.

That said, the phenomenon does come with a real charge effect, and that has never been seen before,
either by astronomers or astrologers. It hasn’t been seen before because astrologers don’t know about
the charge field. Or, if they know about it, they know about only in EM and quantum theory, ignoring
it in planetary relationships. The same is true for astronomers, who know about charge but only at the
microscale. They don’t realize it is a major player in orbits and celestial mechanics, which they think
are gravity-only. So astronomers treat retrograde as an optical illusion, and don’t ask any real physical
questions about it. Which means they don’t get any answers from it.

At one time in the distant past, I thought Mercury was in retrograde when it was on the other side of the
Sun from us. That seems logical, since when Mercury is on the other side of the Sun from us, he is
moving opposite to us in one way. If we are moving right, for instance, he is moving left. We are only
moving the same direction when we are on the same side of the Sun together. But that isn’t how it
works. Moving retrograde is a matter of apparent motion, not real motion, so you have to study the
lines of sight. This you can do at some place like Farmer’s Almanac. If you don’t understand
retrograde motion, study that video. Run it over and over until you understand what is happening. If
this were a result of real motion instead of apparent motion, Mercury would be moving opposite to us
about half the time, when Mercury was opposite the Sun from us; but since it only happens when
Mercury is passing us in orbit, it happens when Mercury is on the same side of the Sun as us, and it
lasts only a few weeks every four months.

So, given what we now know about charge and its place in Solar System mechanics, how could
Mercury passing the Earth cause any real effect here? It could only do so by blocking or soaking up
charge moving from the Sun to the Earth. And in fact, that is what is happening. From my work on
Solar Cycles, we know that planetary alignments have real effects on charge levels, and this is because
the planets recycle charge through their bodies. They capture and channel it. They also feed off it as
they channel it. Charge drives everything at all levels, not only life, but the heat in planetary cores, the
spins of the planets, their tilts, their tides, and everything else. In other words, planets use charge, and
in using it deplete it, just like it was gasoline or something. No, the photons don’t disappear like
gasoline does, but they come out with less energy than they had going in. They may be spin stripped or
spun down, or both. The point is that a planet like Mercury will act to block or deplete charge in his
vicinity. In past papers like the ones on Bode’s Law or Axial Tilt, we were looking at how planets
focus charge, which can seem to increase charge in certain lines. But as they focus it they deplete it in
nearby lines, and that is what we will find here.

Basically, when Mercury is right between the Sun and Earth, it focuses charge by taking it in from the
Sun at the poles in big vortices and re-emitting it at the equator. So charge is swept up from larger
areas and re-emitted into smaller ones. If the Earth is right in the line of that emission from Mercury, it
will feel a boost, but that boost will only happen for a few days. It won’t last three weeks, since the
focus is too tight. So right at the middle of Mercury in retrograde, we should actually expect a boost in
charge. That is when Mercury most aligns to the Earth. But during the rest of the retrograde motion,
Mercury isn’t in the Earth/Sun line, so that focus misses the Earth. It passes left or right of us.
The problem is, Mercury is still sweeping charge into its vortices in those positions, and so it is
sweeping up charge that might have come to us on the Earth. Charge is constantly being redirected by
the interplanetary medium, either by deflection or by absorption and re-emission at the ionic level, so
charge isn’t coming to us just from the direct line of the Sun. What this means in that in those
retrograde positions to the side, Mercury is actually deflecting charge that would normally come to us.
So during most of Mercury’s retrograde, we are getting a slightly diminished field. This has real
effects, since the Earth feeds off charge. Charge drives everything here, including crops, the seasons,
and our bodies.

We should now know the outcome of reduced charge, since we have been living in an extended period
of it for over three years: Solar Minimum. That isn’t caused by Mercury, it is caused by poor
alignments over several years among the Sun, the big planets, and the Galactic Core. But the general
mechanism is the same as retrograde, just on a much larger scale. Bad things tend to happen in times
of reduced charge, and it isn’t a matter of bad luck, voodoo, dark forces, or Satan. As the simplest
example, you may have noticed you are more likely to stub your toe or trip over the doorstep if you
haven’t eaten in a while. That is because your body is starved of energy and it isn’t working at
optimum. This can and does cause more serious accidents, like car crashes or trainwrecks. People
forget to look at dials, miss warning lights, or make other fatal errors. On somewhat larger timescales,
we find charge deficiencies causing famines, droughts, and other catastrophes, natural and unnatural.
The worst real and manufactured events have tended to fall on Solar Minima over the past century and
that is no accident.

How could Solar cycles affect manufactured events, you may ask? Because the cycles are known to
those who run the world, and their prior knowledge allows them to schedule certain events for that
time, knowing they will find less resistance then. The Covid scam is just the latest example. They
knew we would have a litany of physical complaints in these years, caused by low charge but
seemingly with no known cause. No mainstream doctor will tell you you are suffering from low charge
since they have no pill for it, and the mainstream media was also instructed to publicize the minimum
as little as possible. Most people still don’t know about it, four years later. It was the perfect time to
rename the common cold Covid 19, classify it as a worldwide pandemic of infinite danger, and sell
everyone an expensive vaccine as the cure for their mysterious ailments. Low charge levels already
cause fear and unease, with no other variables, since your body knows something is wrong but can’t
pinpoint it. Your body becomes anxious because it can’t really do anything about low charge but try to
live through it. If you knew about the Solar cycles, some of that anxiety would be dispelled, but rather
than educate people, the rulers decided to once again prey on them, using their anxiety against them,
and increasing it on purpose.

This is why it was pretty easy to predict something bad would happen around 2018-2020. Solar
Minimum is already bad, and it can either be mitigated by education and preparation, or it can
weaponized.

For the same reason, we can predict that at maximum in 2027, the stage will be set for good times.
Whether they materialize is another matter, but the Sun will be on our side then. We will hit minimum
again in 2031, but it shouldn’t be as bad as this time. In 2036 we should see another big maximum,
perhaps giving us something on the scale of the 1958 spike. I hope I live to see it.

You may ask what this means for astrology in a larger sense. Well, although astrology wasn’t built on
charge and still doesn’t recognize it as its own foundation, I have proven that the Earth is influenced by
the planets and stars—not just their bodies, but their positions. There are very real lines of influence
between all bodies, celestial and Earthly, so one might say that astrology is confirmed in its main
assumptions. Even star positions matter, since, despite their distance from us, some of them do help
determine charge streams coming to our system from the galactic core. Charge is fed out into our
vicinity by huge ropes of charge from the center of the galaxy, that the mainstream is starting to see and
catalog. Nearby stars that are in these ropes help us track those lines of charge, so those star positions
are crucial. By tracking those positions an astrologer really could track rising and falling charge levels
locally.

But do any astrologers actually do that? Not that I know of. And because they are ignorant of charge
and how it works, they also tend to be ignorant of the real planetary influences and their sizes. In short,
they are looking at the wrong things. Positions by themselves aren’t enough: you also need to know the
mechanics and even the equations to calculate influences. As just the most obvious example of many,
no astrologer has ever been able to calculate the correct importance of Neptune, because they don’t
realize charge returning to the Sun from the big planets is compressed in density as it returns,
increasing its effect. So, somewhat counter-intuitively, Neptune’s great distance from the Sun works to
his advantage, compressing his charge more than nearer planets like Jupiter, and boosting his
importance in the equations and charts. I only discovered this by solving the Bode’s Law problem and
the Axial Tilt problem, in which the equations only worked by including this unforeseen law. I intuited
the logical solution once I was deep in the equations, but since no one had been there before me, they
could not have done the same.

At any rate, my charge theory does not support much of mainstream astrology, but it does support some
of it, including the basic idea that planetary and stellar positions matter, and may be read as telltales to
larger structures and influences.

OK, so Mercury in retrograde does affect us. When then doesn’t Venus—which is much larger—affect
us more? Venus is much larger than Mercury and far closer to us, so it seems like she would block or
absorb more charge. That’s true, but it again misses an important fact of charge. As we saw above
with Neptune, there is a hidden law or fact no one saw before I came along. It is that charge is denser
near the Sun. Most of the charge in the Solar System is fed into the system by the Sun. Charge comes
here from the galactic core, the spinning Sun captures that charge at the poles using huge vortices that
reach out into space, and then the Sun releases that charge out radially, most heavily near the Solar
equator. That is why the planets all inhabit the region of the Solar equator: they are feeding off that
charge like pigs at a trough. But of course as the charge moves out from the Sun, it spreads out,
moving into larger areas. So its density falls off by the square.

It is the same thing we see on the Earth, where the atmosphere here is much denser close to the Earth,
falling off as you go higher. So if you were flying around gathering air through a snorkel out the
window, you could gather more the lower you flew. There is less air at higher altitudes. Just so with
the Sun, charge being the atmosphere of the Solar System.

What that means for us here is that Mercury, being closer to the Sun, is moving through a denser
charge field than Venus. Charge is photons, and there are more photons per cubic inch in the vicinity
of Mercury than Venus. So although Mercury is smaller, he gathers more photons per second than
Venus. Another thing that helps Mercury is that he is moving faster than Venus, moving 47km/s
instead of 35 km/s for Venus. This extra speed also helps him sweep up more charge per second. The
more charge Mercury sweeps up, the less we get, which is why retrograde is bad for us.