Why were books of Enoch and Thomas removed from the bible?
Sat 10:53 am +00:00, 4 Jan 2025 1The Books of Thomas and Enoch were at one time in the bible. Why were they removed? Thomas is where the sayings of Jesus were recorded, including when he said that the Earth is a corpse. The same facts were at one time generally known, and even marked on mediaeval maps, such as the final resting places of the vast corpses of Typhon and of Qetzcoatl, but all these histories have been deleted from today’s teaching so that people today find these truths to be ridiculous. Yet facts they undoubtedly are. It is clear that whoever controls the Earth wants us kept in total ignorance of the history of ourselves and of the real science of our bodies and of our souls. Roger Spurr is removing our enforced ignorance day by day on Mudfossil University giving anyone interested a much broadened view of life and death everywhere. He says that the ancient texts, dismissed as myths by academe, are broadly true. As to how it worked, he has no idea, but look at the evidence and accept the facts, as that is truth.
Thanks Tap for that summary very thought provoking. Here are some quotes from Roger towards the end of the first vid:
“We are in a universal life, creation is absolutely no question whatsoever, nothing like this happens from bumping molecules together, only an insane person could think that”
and
“If you think that a bunch of molecules bumped together and started all this stuff you are deluded, absolutely deluded. And if you think there was a Big Bang and everything started from nothing and it all came about and it was all dead dust and that’s how this occurred you are doubly deluded. Evolution is tweaks. God created all of this stuff in exquisite detail and programming”
And you correctly say in your summary above:
“Roger Spurr is removing our enforced ignorance day by day on Mudfossil University giving anyone interested a much broadened view of life and death everywhere”
Roger is a massive stretch for most folk who will consequently probably not persist viewing him. That’s certainly how I felt initially when you and John introduced him here. But his constant drip, drip of evidence eventually broke through my previously fixed notions of what is what