The US/UK/NATO may have just crossed Putin’s final red line on the way to WWIII – Leo Hohmann
Tue 7:50 pm +01:00, 28 May 2024 6 Russia’s nuclear ballistic missile early warning radar network has emerged as a key target of long-range Ukrainian strikes, with three facilities having now been attacked by Kyiv’s drones, including two of them in the past week, Newsweek reports. Ukraine drones reportedly made a SECOND hit an advanced radar system of Russia’s nuclear early warning system on May 26 and into May 27, then attempted to make a third hit. The attack upon a SECOND Over-The-Horizon radar inside Russia is an extremely concerning development because it is clearly being done not for Ukraine’s defense, but rather as a NATO strategic move designed to destabilize and degrade the combat command-and-control system of Russia’s strategic nuclear forces. This SECOND drone attack struck an advanced over-the-horizon early warning radar system in the Orsk region of Orenburg, 1,800 kilometers from the Ukrainian border. Russian analysts stress that a new blow from Ukraine should be expected. According to them, the next NATO target is the radar system in the St. Petersburg region. If Kiev hits this particular radar site, then Russia’s defense capability in the northern direction will be significantly reduced. Moscow will lose the ability to detect in time the launch of incoming missiles with nuclear warheads, rendering the country unable to react quickly to what is happening. In short, NATO is trying to create “blind spots” in Russia’s early-warning radar, making Russia vulnerable to a Nuclear First-Strike attack by the West. The Russians are becoming sitting ducks. With regard to the NATO attack on Russia’s early warning radar, Austrian Army Col. Markus Reisner provided three key analytical point: From a purely military perspective, this would make sense. The West knows it cannot field an army large enought, short of a highly unpopular mass conscription of both men and women, to take on Russia-China in a conventional war. The only way the West wins a war with China-Russia is to launch a first-strike nuclear attack, decapitating the Russian power centers and nuclear infrastructure before Russia has a chance to strike back. But this is also a highly risky strategy because if Russia suspects that’s the plan, what’s to stop it from being the West to the punch and launching its own decapitating first strike, taking out Washington, DC, New York, and all of the silors out west that contain intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching Russia? Brace yourselves, dear readers. The rest of this year and into 2025 could get interesting as it’s becoming clearer by the day that our so-called leaders truly desire a World War III scenario with Russia. I would say that, before this first-strike on Russia can happen, the warmongers in the West need to provoke some type of drastic attack from Russia, so they can make it look like Russia deserves what it has coming. Putin has thus far shown himself to be highly restrained and avoided stepping into the traps the West has laid for him. But at some point he will almost certainly have to respond to the constant escalations, the biggest and most outrageous of which has Ukraine using Western-supplied weapons to strike deep inside Russia and take out the country’s most critical defensive infrastructure. It’s interesting how very little is being reported about the upcoming war between NATO and Russia and how NATO is attacking Russia’s missile defense systems which play no role in the Ukraine war. What if Russia starts doing the same thing to the U.S. and/or NATO’s early warning radar systems. According to my online research, NATO has its early warning systems at Thule Air Base, Greenland; Beale Air Force Base, California; Clear Space Force Station, Alaska; Cape Cod Space Force Station, Massachusetts; and Royal Air Force Fylingdales, United Kingdom.
|
The early warning detectors are often satellites observing the ground. These communicate back to ground based systems like the ‘space telescopes’ at Jodrell Bank, which we are told are looking for signals from outer space.
According to Alex and Alexanders interview with Dmitry Orlov yesterday then, the damage was superficial and fixed quickly
Talk of WW3 is scaremongering, it’s all over the controlled “alternative” media right now. But the west cannot muster a conventional army to attack Russia at the moment. That would be suicidal, Russia has never been defeated on home soil, every western invading army has been comprehensively defeated. The wests current woke gayboy army wouldn’t stand a chance. Even if they had the weapons and industrial capacity, which they don’t
As for the “nuclear” threat that cannot ever happen. Even if nuclear weapons exist and work then, nobody can ever use them. I don’t think that they do exist myself, see Mathis numerous papers and others. We have no evidence whatsoever that the damn things work do we. My bet is that they don’t and that they have been a pure psyop all along, a very very effective psyop that scared the daylights out of billions of folk
Hiroshima? Nagasaki? Just look at the photos, they look exactly the same as all the other Japanese cities that were firebombed. Mathis and others show that all the photos of Hiroshima and Nagasaki are fake. Why would that be?
Both side obviously know this too. And the Russians must know the truth about the moon landing nonsense, and 9/11 etc etc but keep schtum. Why would that be?
Thank you for your comment, Pete.
I find Dimitry Orlov very interesting. II remember reading his work when he was blogging from the States, and he has also written several books. He was educated in the States and has worked in a variety of professions/occupations there.
I have thus far avoided listening to the discussion you reference as Alexander continuously interrupts others with “if I could just say”.
For anyone interested in hearing more from Orlov, Dialogue Works has had several fascinating interviews which are full of information as Dimitry has returned to Russia and is living in Saint Petersburg, ( Nima asks relevant questions but does not interrupt – he lets others talk and listens, which his audience appreciates greatly.)
Thanks danceaway
Yes Orlov is an interesting guy. His predictions regarding the wests collapse have proved prescient too. His opinions have stood the test of time. His books that I have read are excellent, particularly the one about the 5 stages of collapse. He lived in the US on a boat, so was never land based there for long. He left the US to return to Russia, having originally left Russia after the Soviet collapse and descent into western managed NeoLiberal madness. Now the US is going the same way, quir ironic…..
I agree, his chats with Nima are more interesting too. Orlov is a Russian patriot and never fails to make blunt assessments. The chat with Alex and Alexander yesterday was plagued by sound problems, and thus not as easy to listen to as normal with the Duran guys. But he and Alexander made some strong points about the latest state of play. They both dismissed the early warning system attacks as superficial…
Orlov dismisses WW3 out of hand too. The west doesn’t have the capability, as I said above. And the Russian army is learning more about how to win every day. It’s a disgusting spectacle, the west throws the flower of Ukraine youth into the Donbass meat grinder. They are losing 1400 men every day according to Orlov. And the Russians slow and steady attrition strategy is minimising their casualties. They can sustain this far longer than Nato possibly can….
I find Orlov’s bluntness so refreshing!! Such a contrast to those who skirt around or avoid altogether sensitive topics to protect their you tube income; this has really been highlighted by the Israeli/Gaza events. Controlled opposition make themselves so visible.
Yes, me too, I appreciate his bluntness very much. So much so that I subscribe $4 a month to his Boosty blog where he has less than 2k subscribers, and where all his work is now available. Good value….
Controlled opps are every where in the “alternative” media as you imply. I’m slightly equivocal about the Duran tbh. A rule of thumb is that channels with hundreds of thousands of followers are likely controlled in some way. Duran has 409k. It’s not hard and fast though, so how to know?
I do get the impression that A&A have been down the rabbit holes somewhat, and have recently become a tad more open to background realities. I imagine that they are coining it with their 3 channels though, but I don’t know how YouTube works in that respect so I’m not sure…