Royal Insider: Kate Middleton Was Murdered in ‘Illuminati Blood Sacrifice’

Kate Middleton

Newensign: One has to remember the enemy hates Royalty as they are not so easy to subvert as politicians are. While there is no doubt that down the centuries the House of Rothschild and other Edomites have been infiltrating European Royal Houses, but there is still a remnant of true Judah (that is not Jewish) remaining. Is this what is being taken out??

Click Link Below:

https://rumble.com/v4jlzq9-royal-insider-kate-middleton-was-murdered-in-illuminati-blood-sacrifice.html

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER
Get the latest Tap posts emailed to you daily

14 Responses to “Royal Insider: Kate Middleton Was Murdered in ‘Illuminati Blood Sacrifice’”

  1. Tapestry says:

    Any evidence?

  2. newensign says:

    Good question Tap, they said the same about Diana, but others say Diana was never in the car – I seem to remember a Chris Spivvy did a lot of work on that.

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      Diana was a role played by more that one actress according to Spivey. He did some very convincing work on that. She probably retired somewhere [US?] to anonymity

      Middleton is a Goldsmith via her mother. So one of the money people. Her story is deeply suspect, particularly the 3 kids. Rather like Markle there was strong evidence of a prosthetic bump during pregnancy, so maybe a surrogate?

      I find it hard to believe that she has been terminated because she’s real ,or some sort of threat. They’ve got to come up with a convincing story soon. We need to see her, or have a credible explanation for where she’s gone. It’s going to be fascinating to watch with a leery eye

      • newensign says:

        I agree Pete. I also understand that before her marriage she was in some very sleazy business, so she may have stepped on a few toes or she may have upset Prince Andrew. Who knows! Yes, it would be interesting know what Chris Spivey makes of it?

  3. ian says:

    TBH is this stuff worth bothering with. The B4stards are going to kill us, and possibly Dianna was a fkn fake???? come on guys.

    • newensign says:

      We need to endeavour to track the enemy, particularly about its internal strife Ian, as 92% of winning the battle is knowing who the real enemy is and what damage they are suffering!

      • pete fairhurst 2 says:

        I agree newensign. Understanding them is vital if we are to combat them. And I think that we will be able to oppose them if we stand firm under natural law. They are panicking now it seems, worried about their loss of control because of increasing awareness all round

        What option have we got Ian? Accept our fate and curl up into a foetal ball and await events? Or stand proud and do whatever we can to resist? We’ve surely got no choice knowing what we know. Knowledge and associated consciousness are key I think. So keep spreading the word, even though that is spectacularly unproductive most of he time, as we both know. Every ally helps and some seeds germinate

  4. Belyi says:

    I believe that the whole royal family has gone and has been replaced by clones or body doubles. None of them look quite the way the real ones did and Kate who was a very pretty girl, looks positively plain.

    • newensign says:

      I think you are right Belyi, its all a big pantomime we are watching, but I am sure there are still some of the true bloodline about especially on the continent.

      • pete fairhurst 2 says:

        I don’t agree Belyi. The early Kate looked like a male to female tranny to me. Had the hips of a bloke, no curves. Definitely not childbearing hips

        Maybe a later model looked more realistic, but the early one was mannish. Hence surrogacy was strongly suspected

        • pete fairhurst 2 says:

          For clarity, I’ve no problem with the first part of your comment Belyi:

          “I believe that the whole royal family has gone and has been replaced by clones or body doubles. None of them look quite the way the real ones did”

          I wouldn’t rule that out at all. Entirely possible with these weird people

  5. newensign says:

    A comment received from Renate:

    I looked at another email were she was shown shopping at a farm shop with her children.
    Body double or not? Anyway she clearly is a man, and so is Meghan Markel.
    Both of them have very wide shoulders, very long arms and no hips at all. And no waistline Also look at the eyebrow bones, they are definitely male, and the eyes are lower than female ones are.
    And then there is this sharp jaw line, which is male.
    And also Harry is not Harry at all. Totally different head shape, for once.
    Lots of things going on…

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      Markle used a prosthetic baby bump too. She one squatted down in high heels on video, in a way that was absolutely physically impossible for a real woman. I never thought she is mannish though but that comment makes me wonder. There’s probably more than one Markle

      I’ve got Spivey’s book about her. She’s a total fraud

      • newensign says:

        Thanks for that interesting info Pete, I will pass it on to Renate. Interesting Spivey has a book on it – Is it still possible to obtain a copy? If so could you let me have the details?