Who actually is “The Crown”? – Certainly not the King

Here is one take:

“All “Constitutional Rights” in America are simply those dictated by the Crown Temple and en- forced by the Middle Inn Templars (Bar Attorners) through their franchise and corporate gov- ernment entity, the federal United States Government. When a “State Citizen” attempts to invoke his “constitutional”, natural, or common law “rights” in Chancery (equity courts), he is told they don’t apply. Why? Simply because a State citizen has no rights outside of the Rule and Codes of Crown “law”. Only a state citizen has natural and common law rights by the paramount authority of God’s Law.

To have this “Declaration” recognized by international treaty law, and in order to establish the new legal Crown entity of the incorporated United States, Middle Templar King George III agreed to the Treaty of Paris on September 3, 1783, “between the Crown of Great Britain and the said United States”. The Crown of Great Britain legally was, then and now, the Crown Temple. This formally gave international recognition to the corporate “United States”, the new Crown Temple States (Colonies). Most important is to know who the actual signatories to the Treaty of Paris were.

Take particular note to the abbreviation “Esqr.” following their names (see above definition for ESQUIRE) as this legally signifies “Officers of the King’s Courts”, which we now know were Templar Courts or Crown Courts. This is the same Crown Templar Title giv- en to Alexander Hamilton (see above).

The Crown was represented in signature by “David Hartley, Esqr.”, a Middle Templar of the King’s Court. Representing the United States (a Crown franchise) by signature was “John Adams, Esqr”, “Benjamin Franklin, Esqr.” and “John Jay, Esqr.” The signatories for the “United States” were also Middle Templars of the King’s Court through Bar Association membership. What is plainly written in history proves, once again, that the Crown Temple was representing both parties to the agreement. What a perfect and elaborate scam the people of North Amer- ica had pulled on them!

Although they vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in the U.S., such as the American Bar Association, the Florida Bar, or California Bar Association, are franchises to the Crown.

The Inns of Court (see below, The Four Inns of Court) to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London – a sovereign and independent territory which is not a part of Great Britain (just as Washington City, as DC was called in the 1800s, is not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American people. These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America under the guise and color of law (see definitions for legal and lawful below). They are known collective- ly as the “Crown.” Their lawyers are actually Templar Bar Attornies, not lawyers.

The present Queen of England is not the “Crown,” as we have all been led to believe. Rather, it is the Bankers and Attornies (Attorneys) who are the actual Crown or Crown Temple. The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling sovereigns since the reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of the old British Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in Chancery.

The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and at- tornies. The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our un- lawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawnbroker.

The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery – the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane – a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorners from the independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent “legal” – but totally unlawful – contracts on the American people. The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorners carry out their Orders by controlling their victim’s judi- ciary.

By what authority has the “Crown” usurped the natural sovereignty of the American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S. Supreme Court decides constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be considered in any manner as being “constitutional” when this same Supreme Court is ap- pointed by (not elected) and paid by the Federal U.S. Government? As you will soon see, the land called North America belongs to the Crown Temple.

The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the Crown Temple from the inde- pendent and sovereign City of London. The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from Switzer- land, the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations, the International Mon- etary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and most importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected his Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland. The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland controls all the central banks of the G7 na- tions.

He who controls the gold rules the world.”

Plenty food for thought there then

Nothing is ever as it seems….

Can anyone refute any of this?

If so then please explain in the comments

Source: https://tabublog.com/2017/01/02/b-a-r-attorney-is-a-crown-corporation/

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER
Get the latest Tap posts emailed to you daily

5 Responses to “Who actually is “The Crown”? – Certainly not the King”

  1. newensign says:

    A good article Pete, but in fact there are 2 crowns the “Royal Crown” and “The Crown”. The Crown is the City of London Crown being a sovereign state. Back in the early1800’s when England went bankrupt under Disraeli, the assets of the Royal Crown were sized as collateral and placed in administration under the Crown Agents. This can be seen on government stationary where the coat of arms does not have a lion atop the crown whereas the real Royal Coat of Arms does. The City has its own agent in Parliament known as the Remembrancer who ensures no legislation is passed contrary to the interests of the City. It also appoints the permanent secretaries to the Civil Service.

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      2 Crowns makes sense newensign thanks, Monarch and City

      All these “LEGAL” words seem to have 2 meanings don’t they. Often the LEGAL meaning is very different to the everyday usage too. Clearly deliberately so

      Yes I knew about the Remembrancer. They play down his role but, in reality his presence in the Commons is a good clue as to who really runs the UK. Is it the Parliament Clown World, which is full of shills who will say anything to advance themselves? Or the City of London which is full of hard nosed money manipulators?

      I use my common sense…..

      For confirmation I just asked ChatGTP:
      When was the City of London incorporated?

      Reply:
      The City of London was originally incorporated by a charter granted by King William I in 1067 [me: year after the Norman Conquest then!]. This early charter granted the citizens of London certain privileges and rights, laying the foundation for the development of the City as a distinct entity within London. Over the centuries, additional charters and privileges were granted, shaping the unique governance and status of the City of London.

      So who really governs the UK?

      An institution that has been making money for the Brit Establishment [oligarchs] for 956 year and that carefully monitors all Westminster Clown World decisions?

      Or Parliament Clown World?

      Common sense🤣🤣

  2. newensign says:

    That was a most interesting reply Pete, so thanks for that. When I looked into the incorporation date of the City, it was said that the Doc. had been lost! We do know the City got its special privileges under Magna Charta signed by King John under duress from the City of London Barons who led the revolt who were probably Khaszars from the Silk Route days pretending to be Saxons. I did read somewhere that the City shut the gates against William. William was financed by the Flanders Khaszars (Jews) so they had leverage over him. I believe the only concession the City made was to allow William use of the Tower of London. I suspect that the charter has not been lost, because they don’t want the public to know the damming evidence of the Jewish finance for the invasion and their changing our Common Law, which thereafter became known as English Common Law!!

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      Thanks newensign you really do have a great grasp of our hidden histories and I really value your opinions on such matters. The usual suspects seem to lurk behind every important event don’t they

      The implication of what you say is that William ruled over England but not the City. That makes sense too. Our current monarch, whoever he/she is, is subservient when in the City. The City officers out rank him/her and this is still evident when the monarch goes into the City nowadays

      • newensign says:

        The trouble is Pete the more one studies the more one finds out how little one knows. I use the Scriptures as a guide line which have been misrepresented by the enemy controlled clergy. The book is 78% about government and law. The so called Church is responsible for the trouble we are in now by supporting the enemy and breaking the Law.