Is Mike Yeadon being Censored?

Two recent conferences and, apparently, two technical issues. Coincidence or calculated and deliberate?

Dr. Mike Yeadon was part of the conventional pharmaceutical establishment for decades. Covid1984 forced him to re-evaluate everything he believed in. Monday 04 December Andrew Bridgen organised and hosted a 2 hour meeting at the Wilson Room, Portcullis House, within the UK Parliamentary offices. This is Sonia Elijah’s Substack report on the event:
World Leading Experts Testify at UK’s Parliamentary Office
https://soniaelijah.substack.com/p/world-leading-experts-testify-at

However, Dr. Yeadon’s video presentation, included below, was not used. He insists, “There has not been a pandemic”.

Yeadon says,
“The all cause mortality data did not increase leading up to the declaration by WHO.”
He believes the cause of death was the use of unnecessary mass ventilation, sedatives and people were denied life saving antibiotics and died of bacterial pneumonia.
He asserts it’s impossible to invent, test, clinically evaluate, manufacture and launch on a global scale a complex biomedical product.
This is his presentation that was omitted from the Portcullis House conference:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/uuNPXypi8klu/


I understand Dr. Peter McCullough’s presentation was also omitted; for technical reasons too.

The following is copied from Mike Yeadon’s Telegam channel: https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon
It refers to a second, earlier conference at which his presentation was broadcast, but subsequently omitted from the recorded archive.

He stated…

‘I may have mentioned that I had been invited to address a sizeable gathering in the German parliament, a couple of weekends ago? A lengthy session arranged by the party of the admirably feisty MEP, Christine Anderson, the AfD. They have something like 82 members of Parliament, mostly in the former East, and 9 MEPs. Not too shabby. I was promised an audience of 90 elected representatives and 200 eager officials, together possessing a veritable alternative network that doesn’t rely on mainstream media for its communication. They realised early that they were never going to get a fair shake by their media, so decided to not try to pretend to be like the other parties and simply represent those with no voice. Admirable stuff. So, persuaded it was worth a shot, I prepared a short talk. I was surprised to find I had the last slot & looking at the people & topics, I thought, wow, I’ve got a chance to really get an impact.
I simplified & focused on the alleged vaccines. How there could never have been sufficient time to have done what was claimed. That even if the narrative was true, virtually nobody would benefit from it because they’re not at risk. That pregnant women have for 60 years never been exposed to new medicines, not even once fully approved.
Then I described rational drug design, and my career using it. The awful conclusion that toxicity was built into these agents. Five discrete mechanisms of toxicity. By the way, our molecular biology experts find an additional handful of mechanisms of harm, to do with nuclear entry, all superfluous to the notional purpose.
The conclusion is that we are under intense attack. That we can repel these evil people by sufficient of us simply refusing to comply with the campaign of fear. The economy may be decimated in whatever is coming but that we can recover as free individuals.
After I’d finished, there was a strange noise. It was the usual polite applause, but a roar that simply didn’t stop. I switched camera view on my screen. The whole place was on its feet. They were clapping like mad. It went on for an embarrassing 2-3 minutes.
Gratified, I mumbled thanks for the opportunity to speak to them and ended the link.
I learned yesterday that dissenting voices in AfD had decided my opinions were too extreme and they’ve excised my presentation from the link to the session, which I understand has now been made public.
It’s very depressing and frustrating to find I’m being censored by what I thought was our own side.
I don’t think I’m going to get a copy of my own speech, either.
If you know anyone connected to whatever is going on there, we’d love to hear a perspective from the inside.

Best wishes
Mike

Ps: someone alleged that there had been a problem with the sound. I don’t believe that for a moment.’

Back to Ned Substack commenting: It seems Christine Anderson’s IDF hosted a conference whereby Mike Yeadon spoke yet the archive does not include Mike Yeadon’s speech. The following is a link to a Twitch account, the first time I’ve ever accessed Twitch. At about 34 mins Mike Yeadon is referenced:
https://m.twitch.tv/videos/1986525909

Mike himself states, again from his Telegram channel:

‘This is a remarkable video. Please ignore the first few minutes. JJ Couey has an elaborate opening sequence.
But he addresses THE elephant in the room: why don’t the freedom fighters argue with or accept Denis Rancourt’s detailed epidemiological analyses which show THERE WAS NO PANDEMIC?
Therefore, there was no new cause of illness and death, therefore covid is invented and SARS-CoV-2 isn’t circulating (or is silent).
Therefore nobody needs vaccines against it.
Therefore no one should accept the inevitable risk of harms that come with being injected with intentionally harmful substances.
Why are so desperately few of us saying this?
I’m censored and mad as hell.
Where is Christine Anderson’s anger that her party organised a symposium and my testimony was deleted?
WHO may be scary.
But I’m much more frightened of the introduction of mandatory digital ID.
I’m much more fearful of withdrawal of cash & imposition of CBDC.
If we allow the distorted narrative (that “there was a novel lethal pathogen so they needed to do something”) to remain unchallenged, it is the end.

Best wishes
Mike’

I also copied from Dr. Yeadon’s telegram channel:

‘I recall without any doubt referencing the work of Denis Rancourt & colleagues, showing that there never was a pandemic.
Now, I know longer believe respiratory viruses as described exist as agents of pathology, the main evidence for this belief being the repeated, unsuccessful demonstration of clinical contagion (transmission from a person with florid symptoms to healthy people without symptoms, which ought to be trivially easy, if the narrative is true).’

Back to Ned Substack commenting: Mike Yeadon appears to be a sincere, qualified, experienced and level headed chap. What’s going on? He is questioning even the existence of viruses. The likes of the UK Column’s Mike Robinson has said they do not go into terrain versus germ theory, because it detracts from the falsehoods of the covid1984 pandemic. Dr. Yeadon is far more experienced than I or UKC’s Mike Robinson in the area of pharmaceutical and medical matters and is following what he perceives as the truth. It’s all very interesting.

Currently, Bollox Johnson & co are giving testimony to the Covid1984 Enquiry and apologising for not locking down harder. Lockdown my arse. The lockdown orders were clown world policy implemented by clowns and followed by clowns. As Scotland’s John Watt puts it, we can but keep ‘Bringing The Noise’ till they take notice.

Yurtta Barış Dünyada Barış : Peace At Home, Peace İn The World… if only.

Ned Substack:
https://nedpamphilon.substack.com/p/is-mike-yeadon-being-censored
Previous TAP:
https://tapnewswire.com/2023/12/english-sovereign-tea/

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

3 Responses to “Is Mike Yeadon being Censored?”

  1. ian says:

    I’m sure Mike Yeadon and many more are censored Ned. I’ve been trying to paint some sloes, watercolour/acrylics,, I’m so jealous of you.

  2. NPP says:

    Look like grapes or fruit of some sort to me. Indeed, commercial greeting card potential.

    I haven’t been round the National Gallery, Trafalgar Square, for years, but when I do, I feel so inadequate by comparison.