UN to Release Meat Consumption Limitations

It has been confirmed that the United Nations will begin to advocate for a reduction in meat consumption this December at the COP28 summit. The UN states that “richer nations” must do their part to adhere to the Paris Climate Accords by changing their dietary needs. The people making these decisions on our behalf will be flying to the summit on their private jets and dining in luxury. These top 1% of “polluter elites” produce more carbon emissions than the bottom 66% combined.

The EAT-Lancet Commission (also called EAT Forum) has partnered with the UN to provide future dietary guidelines. “While meat is an important source of key nutrients including protein, iron and vitamin B12, excess meat consumption can harm our health and the planet. Aim to consume no more than 98 grams of red meat (pork, beef or lamb), 203 grams of poultry and 196 grams of fish per week,” their website states. A chicken breast contains about 24 grams of protein, for perspective.

“The EAT-Lancet Commission provide scientific targets that will allow us to feed up to 10 billion people by 2050 within planetary boundaries.” This is the precise target that the World Economic Forum has been targeting – 2050. The WEF has stated that since the world’s population will grow to 9.7 billion by 2050, we need to begin incorporating insects into our diets to feed the additional 2 billion mouths.

There is no statistically significant correlation between our current meat consumption and CO2 emissions or feeding the population in a few decades. We all saw the likes of Kamala Harris and other politicians using their gas stoves on Thanksgiving while they were telling the masses, the Great Unwashed, to remove them from their homes to save the planet. The climate change agenda is purely a control tactic. It gives the elite globalists control over our tax spending, energy and food consumption, and freedom of movement. The very people preaching that we must abandon our way of life to save the world KNOW that it is a scam.

 

Source: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/great-reset/the-eat-lancet-commission-one-serving-of-meat-per-day-recommended/

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

12 Responses to “UN to Release Meat Consumption Limitations”

  1. ian says:

    Yes it’s a scam, but like covid, it is swallowed by the masses.

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      Dodgy pun there Ian! 🙂

      But that remains to be seen. Given the choice of a beetleburger or a sirloin I suspect that there won’t be many takers for the bugburger

      And there is the question of enforcement, how will this be enforced? Will we all get a meat ration coupon for our “dumbass” phones? I can’t imagine us plebs agreeing to that so easily. Unless there is a VERY VERY good reason, something plainly visible to all

      So far the Climate Change scam has had minimal real world evidence, it’s pure assertion and virtually evidence free. The climate changes by itself, always has done, always will. Recent changes have been minimal compared with past events, see Velikovsky and Mudfossils and more. I’ve seen nothing yet in my 70+ years real world experience that supports their Climate Change hypothesis

      • ian says:

        Hi Pete. The big guys seem to be buying up farmland and turning other farm areas into re-wilding areas. I assume by that means, they’ll create scarcity. It may be over a lengthy period, ten or so years. By then, they’ll have us ID’d and on social credit scores. I could imagine your food rations being credit score related. Be a good boy and get two sausages, or be naughty and eat ze bugs.

        • pete fairhurst 2 says:

          That is the plan it seems Ian. Best laid plans and all….. They will surely fail though

          Because those plans are anti-human and against Natural Law. The proponents of all this are clearly insane, they’ve completely lost touch with reality. Those that consistently offend against Natural Law will pay the penalty at some point, it will not end well for them

        • sovereigntea says:

          They need to be careful ….. a hungry enough population will “Eat The Rich” and there is more fat on them 🙂

  2. Belyi says:

    I don’t eat meat but I almost feel like going back to it to score one off these prying idiots who work on the one law for us and one law for you principle. As Greta would say: how dare they.

  3. sovereigntea says:

    In yet another example of the sanctimonious hipocrisy of these deceitful grifters.

    The Bolshevik Zionist Daily Mail reports ….

    Charles III, Rishi Sunak and Lord Cameron are to fly separately to the Gulf on private jets later this week – to attend a major summit on climate change.

    Downing Street today confirmed the three political big-hitters would each get their own jet to fly to Dubai for Cop28.

    The King is set to deliver an address at the opening ceremony of the World Climate Action Summit where leaders will seek to update action to reduce global temperature rises.

    No10 defended the decision for the Prime Minister and the Foreign Secretary to fly separately – and said that lower ranking ministers and officials would fly out on commercial flights.

    The PM’s official spokesman said that Lord Cameron ‘has different travel plans, which is not unusual for a Foreign Secretary’, adding: ‘The government’s approach to tackling climate change, as we have set out repeatedly, is not about banning or reducing people from flying.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12805131/King-Charles-Rishi-Sunak-Lord-Cameron-separate-private-jets-Cop28-climate-change-Dubai.html

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      That is crazy sov, they don’t even pretend anymore do they

      Mind you, I can’t blame Sunak and “Pig’s head” Cameron for avoiding Big Ears. Who would possibly want to spend any more time with King Sausage Fingers than is absolutely necessary, given his incredibly nefarious background?

    • ian says:

      Aye say’s it all.

  4. ian says:

    Even Greta Funbird, was sailed out to the US on the Rotty’s yacht, but the replacement crews were flown in. Off topic, today on a walk in the frosty sunshine, in the distance I saw someone approaching from a good few hundred yards away. A woman I thought, pale blue quilted coat with a fur lined hood, as she got nearer I noticed that the hood was a mere fur lined slot, “no don’t go there”, I could see a blue mask, and that was it. a slot in the furry hood with a mask. I said hello and got no reply. Bizarre. They live amongst us.

  5. Steiner60 says:

    They will never ban meat, just make it so expensive you are forced to eat something else. Same as cars: no ban, just make it expensive and a pain in the ass to drive anywhere. Again with cash: they will bring in the CBDC alongside cash and eventually the sheep will give up cash ‘for convenience’, and shops will not find it worth while accepting it. The demons in control are nothing if not sly in their ways. Sadly, I have now little hope that the UK population will grow a backbone and tell gov to jog on.

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      I agree, that is the most likely scenario Steiner60. In fact that is already happening like that. The totalitarianism isn’t so so blatant that way. It is creeping totalitarianism rather than the classic Orwellian boot in face. That is the modern way

      And, given our recent covid experience then, I too have little hope of backbone development in most folk. But I think that a majority is not required, just a sufficiently large minority

      20+% should suffice, hope so anyhow because that is more realistic. 25% or so rejected their dirty “vaccine” [which was actually an experimental drug therapy, not a vaxx] That was enough to kill their immediate plans

      But they are very sly as you say, they learn and find another way. So constant vigilance is required