Ontario Man Files $35.6 Million Lawsuit Against Pfizer Over Son’s Vaccine Death

New Tecumseth, ON, resident Dan Hartman has initiated a wrongful death lawsuit against Pfizer because his son Sean died from the COVID-19 vaccine.

Exposing The Darkness is a reader-supported publication. To support my work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

One-time or recurring donations can be made through Ko-Fi:

By Jonathan Bradley October 16, 2023

New Tecumseth, ON, resident Dan Hartman has initiated a wrongful death lawsuit against Pfizer because his son Sean died from the COVID-19 vaccine.

“On the morning of September 27, 2021, 33 days after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination, Sean Hartman was found deceased in his bedroom by his mother,” said Sheikh Law lawyer Umar Sheikh in a court filing.

“The Plaintiff pleads that Sean Hartman died as a result of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination.”

Dan was denied money from the Vaccine Injury Support Program in March despite Sean dying after getting the COVID-19 vaccine.

“My son died 33 days after his first Pfizer vaccine and he was a perfectly healthy boy with no underlying conditions,” he said.

He took a COVID-19 vaccine to be allowed to play hockey. Dan said he took him to the emergency room four days after his first dose because he had brown circles around his eyes, a rash on his face, and pain in his right shoulder.

American pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole determined in July Sean died from the COVID-19 vaccine.

Cole examined his tissues, finding spike protein in his adrenal glands.

“The adrenal glands control your blood pressure, so if Sean’s blood pressure dropped, he would have died,” said Dan.

Dan is seeking $35.6 million in damages; specialized damages to be determined prior to the trial; prejudgment and post-judgment interest; the costs of the proceeding, including all applicable taxes; and further relief the court considers just.

Sheikh said Pfizer “owed a duty of care to Sean Hartman to accurately inform him of all risks associated with the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination.” He added he owed him a duty to warn him of the risks associated with the safety and efficacy of these vaccines.

When it comes to the standard of care, Dan pleaded Pfizer breached it for the manufacturing, testing, sale, reporting and administration of its vaccines.

With the standard of care, Sheikh alleged it was breached when it disregarded and misrepresented the results of the safety trials by providing an incorrect characterization of the efficacy data; discounting results of adverse events on vaccinated people in the study; not highlighting all results and adverse events revealed in the studies conducted; and not stopping their administration on Canadians due to known safety concerns.

Dan pleaded Pfizer negligently misrepresented the safety of the vaccine and did not disclose the risks associated with it, which include but are not limited to myocarditis and pericarditis.

The particulars include failing to disclose people under 40 years old had an increased risk of myocarditis after taking the vaccine, rates of myocarditis were higher in adolescent males, inadequate testing was performed to ensure their safety and efficacy, failing to complete post-market surveillance and inform the Canadian government and the public of the results, failing to disclose the issues with the vaccine, and failing to identify, implement, and verify procedures to address post-market surveillance risks.

He accused Pfizer of improper product distribution when it was being sold. This is because the foreseeable risks exceeded the benefits associated with the product, it was more dangerous than ordinary consumers would expect, it did not have adequate, effective warnings and instructions over these dangers, inadequate testing and it was unfit for the purpose for which it was intended.

Sheikh concluded by saying Pfizer “concealed the fact the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination had severe possible risks and outcomes when administered, including but not limited to myocarditis, pericarditis and death, to the public, healthcare providers, and regulatory authorities, including Health Canada.”

“The Plaintiff pleads that the wrongful death of his son Sean Hartman was caused by the negligence of the Defendant,” he said.

Source: westernstandard.news



4 Responses to “Ontario Man Files $35.6 Million Lawsuit Against Pfizer Over Son’s Vaccine Death”

  1. ian says:

    On yesterday’s UK Column news, it was mentioned that both Pfizer and Moderna are facing bankruptcy. Obviously a scam but it’s how they roll.

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      Yes Ian, their stock price is tanking because their 2023 covid booster has been a massive flop with only 2% uptake. They are incinerating billions of $ worth as a result! Yipee!

      Some good news for a change, see my post yesterday


      • ian says:

        Yes Pete, good news, but will anyone be able to sue them now. I read your post. very good too Pete.

        • pete fairhurst 2 says:

          Inability to sue was built in I think Ian. Governments signed contracts that indemnified the vaxx providers. So it was a no lose situation for them, they had zero incentive to take care knowing that whatever injury they caused then, they were liability free [scot free even :-)]

          This was a massive tell at the very start for me. These pharma corps are rapacious, venal, scumbags mainly. They have paid out $billions in injury fines previously, without batting an eyelid, profits were so high. I told lots of folk too, but to no avail, the fear porn took over

          But still, it never ceased to amaze me that all the arm proffering covidians didn’t seem to mind about their ignominious track record one little bit. Would you buy a used car from these people? Never mind accept an experimental, virtually untested, drug from them. Sigh