6 Responses to “New 9/11 Footage No Plane”

  1. pete fairhurst 2 says:

    No surprise there Gordon. The laws of physics tell you that if a, mainly aluminium, plane hits a solid concrete wall, or indeed massive inches thick steel columns then, the debris would be all over the place, and primarily OUTSIDE the building

    Newtons third law of motion:

    “Whenever one object exerts a force on another object, the second object exerts an equal and opposite on the first.”

    So the airframe would shatter immediately. Even if a plane could fly at 500mph close to the ground, which is impossible too

    9/11 was the only day in history when Newtons third law failed! Three times too!

    But I saw it on tv! It went straight into the building! Really? 🙂 🙂

  2. NPP says:

    Absolute nonsense.
    There were planes.
    There were further planes possibly planned that did not make their targets.
    You are NOT helping by posting erroneous information.
    e.g. no plane at the Pentagon prevents important connection of those on board to the perpetrators.
    Building 7 fell due to fire.
    It was an inside job.
    There were bombs in the basement.
    There were planes.
    No holograms.
    No energy weapons.

    Oh dear oh dear.

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      Dear oh dear indeed

      So you think that Newtons third law was inapplicable on that day do you? And that an aluminium airframe can shatter steel, rather than the other way round? And that consequently the debris can all disappear inside the building? Really

      The tv pictures were obviously ludicrous. The plane shaped hole in the towers was pure Hollywood. If it was real then, why wasn’t the hole in the Pentagon plane shaped too?

      We are way past worrying about “connection to the perpetrators” surely. We don’t really need any detail to know who did it, or why. And if you are looking for “justice” then I fear that you will have a long wait

      I’m not going to be drawn into an argument Ned. That would be a pointless waste of energy. Whatever the truth is then, the BS that the tv showed has still become a modern myth. It was on tv so it must be true, sigh

  3. Steve Kettle says:

    There was not one piece of debris fell down the tower as the plane hit it…. as Pete rightly says a physical impossibility.
    much the same as the intact “nose cone” of the plane seen exiting on the other side.
    It’s like firing an aluminium drinks can at a steel shipping container and expecting it to go straight through leaving a round hole.
    Ain’t gonna happen.

  4. NPP says:

    Ryan Dawson is best on 9/11. He went there, did the foot work, secured FOI material. He wipes your proverbial with his knowledge. I’ve posted it on TAP several times.
    Loose Change did get the date right. Alex Jones told Trump it was ‘dancing arabs’…

    My beloved UK Column are also fixated with physics. Newton’s Law… oh dear. David Scott believes the silly Building 7 what ever it was…

    You are misguided & perpetuating lies.
    The perpetrators love you pedaling your nonsense. Congratulations.

    P.S. because I love you…
    Remembering 9/11 with a marathon, documents, dates, suspects & motive
    It’s only 11 1/2 hours long. Do you have an attention span?

    Yes. Dear oh phuckin’ dear.

    • pete fairhurst 2 says:

      That’s a first for me, refuting Newtons laws of motion! 🙂 🙂 🙂

      Even Einstein didn’t try to do that, he just amended them to account for light speed